Blended Learning in a Paragraph Writing Course: A Case Study
The emergence of online learning offers the opportunities that are not possessed by the traditional face-to-face learning environment. Combining the strengths of the online learning and face-to-face learning, known as blended learning, is believed to enhance the quality of learning. Different subjects may have different designs of blended learning because there is no specific formula for the best practices of blended learning. This paper reports a study investigating the implementation of blended learning in a paragraph writing course. The purposes were to investigate the blended learning activities carried out in the paragraph writing course and to find out the extent to which it affected students’ writing paragraph performance. The participants of this case study, who were selected purposively, involved one lecturer and six students of a paragraph writing class. The techniques for collecting data included interviews, observations, and document analysis, and the data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model. Ten blended learning activities, including five activities in face-to-face settings and five activities online, were identified in the course. The students’ paragraph writing performance seen from the result of final test was satisfying, indicating that the use of blended learning had a positive effect on students’ writing performance.
 Badger, R. & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
 “Best IELTS preparation” (2013). The Importance of Paragraphs in IELTS Writing Re-trieved from http://www.bestieltsonline.com/paragraphs-in-ielts-writing-2/
 Birgin, O. & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess student’s performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 75-90.
 Bowyer, J. & Chambers, L. (2017). Evaluating blended learning: bringing the elements together. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessments Publication, 23, 17-26.
 Bridge, P. & Appleyard, R. (2008). A comparison of electronic and paper-based as-signment submission and feedback. Brittish Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 644-650. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007. 00753.x
 Brown, G., & Manogue, M. (2001). Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Medical Teacher, 23(3), 231-244. doi: 10.1080/01421590120043000
 Bryson, S. (2014). How to structure a paragraph in an academic essay. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/how-to-structure-a-paragraph-in-an-academic-essay/
 Davis, K. (2009). Improving motivation and knowledge retention with repeatable low-stakes quizzing. American Society for Engineering Education. 1-7.
 Ebner, H. K. (2016). Work conferences and student engagement. Masters of Arts in Education Action Research Papers. Paper 153.
 Epignosis LLC (2014). E-learning; concepts, trends, applications. Retrieved from http://www.talentlms.com/elearning-101-jan2014-v1.1.pdf
 Garrison, D. R. & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. San Francisco-USA.
 Ghahari, S., & Ameri-Golestan, A. (2013). The effect of blended learning vs. classroom learning techniques on Iranian EFL learner’s writing. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 77-86.
 Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 Jensen, E. B. (2016). Peer-review writing workshops in college course: students’ per-spectives about online and classroom-based workshops. Social Sciences, 5(72), 1-17. Dopi: 10.3390/socsci5040072.
 Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Edu-cation, 4(4), 298-310. doi: 10.1187/05-06-0082
 Liu, M. (2013). Blended learning in a university EFL writing course: description and evaluation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 301-309. Doi: 10.4304/jltr.4.2.301-309.
 Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and omline tutoring: planning leaner support and activity design (2nd ed.). Hampshire, England: Gower Publishing Limited.
 Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a meth-ods sourcebook (3rd ed.). California, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
 Sansivero, G. (2016) Challenges & advantages of collaborative learning: developing workforce readiness in students. SEEN (SouthEast Education Network) Magazine. http://www.seenmagazine.us/Articles/Article-Detail/ArticleId/5613/CHALLANGES-amp-ADVANTAGES-OF-COLLABORATIVE-LEARNING
 Savage, A. & Shafiei, M. (2007). Effective academic writing 1: the paragraph. New York: Oxford University Press.
 Spencer, J. (2015). The power of student conferencing. Retrieved from http://www.spenerauthor.com/the-power-of-student-conferencing/
 Stein, J. & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: a standards-based guide. Routledge. Third Avenue-New York.
 Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning; how to integrate online and traditional learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
 Tuomainen, S. (2016). A blended learning approach to academic writing and presen-tation skills. De Gruyter, 3(2), 33-55.
 Twigg, C. A, (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: new models for online learning. Educause Review, 28-38.
 Zemach, D. E. & Islam, C. (2007). Paragraph writing: from sentence to paragraph. London: McMillan.
 Zemach, D. E. & Rumisek, L. A. (2005). Academic writing: from paragraph to essay. Oxford: McMillan.
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Language Teaching and Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to International Journal of Language Teaching and Education (IJoLTe) and Magister Program of English Education Department, Universitas Jambi as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
IJoLTe keep the rights to articles that have been published. And, the authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link of IJoLTe' website. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from IJoLTe with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
IJoLTe and Magister Program of English Education Department, Universitas Jambi, and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in IJoLTe are the sole and responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors who submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. IJoLTe will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. IJoLTe will only communicate with the corresponding author.
By submitting the article/manuscript to this journal, the authors agree with this policy and consciously agree that IJoLTe does not provide royalties or other fees to the authors for their published articles. By agreeing this policy, IJoLTe ensures that published articles are publicly accessible and will be free of charge for the readers. No specific document sign-off is required.
Users of this website will be licensed to use materials from this website following the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Please use the materials accordingly
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.