Konstruksi Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Levels of Inquiry disertai Socio-Scientific Issues untuk Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah

(Construction Levels of Inquiry Model Learning Tools accompanied Socio-Scientific Issues for Problem Solving Skills)

Authors

  • Afandi Afandi Universitasa Tanjungpura
  • Titin Titin Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Yuyun Setyawati Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i4.13777

Abstract

This study to analyze the need for problem solving skills of class X SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Pontianak, develop learning tools on ecosystem materials, and determine the validity and reliability of learning device. The research method used is Thiagarajan et al. The learning tools developed consisted of 6 lesson plans and 6 student worksheets based on the levels of inquiry accompanied by socio-scientific issues, handout, power point, and evaluation question. The results obtained were the validity of 6 lesson plans and 6 student worksheet, handout, power point, and evaluation question, namely v ≥ 0,8 (valid). The result of interrater reliability was using ICC on 5 lesson plans and 5 student worksheets, power point are 0,75-0,9 (good). While the reliability on 1 lesson plan and 1 student worksheets, handout, and evaluation question got a value of 0,5-0,75 (moderate). Developed learning tools were asserted worthy to use.

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa kelas X SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Pontianak, mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran pada materi ekosistem, dan mengetahui validitas serta reliabilitas perangkat pembelajaran. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Research and Development (R&D) mengacu pada model Four-D yang dikemukakan oleh Thiagarajan, dkk. Perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan terdiri dari 6 buah RPP dan 6 buah LKPD berdasarkan tingkatan model levels of inquiry disertai socio-scientific issues, handout, power point, dan soal evaluasi. Diperoleh hasil validitas 6 buah RPP dan 6 buah LKPD, handout, power point, dan soal evaluasi yaitu v ≥ 0,8 (valid). Hasil reliabilitas antar rater menggunakan ICC pada 5 buah RPP dan 5 buah LKPD, media pembelajaran yaitu 0,75-0,9 (baik). Sedangkan reliabilitas pada 1 buah RPP dan 1 buah LKPD, handout, dan soal evaluasi mendapatkan nilai 0,5-0,75 (sedang). Perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan dinyatakan layak untuk digunakan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azwar, Syaiful. (2012). Reliabilitas Dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cahyani, Hesti, & Ririn Wahyu Setyawati. (2016). Pentingnya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui PBL Untuk Mempersiapkan Generasi Unggul Menghadapi MEA. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 151–60.

Koo, Terry K., & Mae Y. Li. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15(2):155–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

Lederman, Norman G., Judith S. Lederman, A. Nature, Norman G. Lederman, Judith S. Lederman, & Allison Antink. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 1(3):138–47. doi: 10.18404/ijemst.19784.

Mazfufah, Nuzi Fahdia, Yanti Herlanti, & Yuke Mardianti. (2018). Increasing Scientific Reasoning within Discussion of Scientific Issues on Virus Topics. 3rd International Conferences on Education in Muslim Society (ICEMS). doi: 10.2991/icems-17.2018.39.

Morris, Lynn Lyons, & Carol Fitz-Gibbon Taylor. (1986). How to Measure Achievement. London: Sage Publicity.

Mourtos, Nj, Ndj Okamoto, & J. Rhee. (2004). Defining, Teaching, and Assessing Problem Solving Skills. 7th UICEE Annual Conference on Enginnering Education, (February 2004):9–13.

Nadiroh, N., V. Zulfa, & S. Yuliani. (2021). Learning Transformation of the 21stcentury Curriculum for Prospective Teacher in Term of Eco-Literacy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012009.

Nana, A. Y. (2005). Microsoft Office Power Point. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

National Education Association. (2010). Preparing 21st Century Students Fo a Global Society: An Educator's Guide to the 'Four Cs'. Retrieved from www.nea.org.>assets>docs>A guide-toFour-cs.

Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Demetra, Andreas Ch Hadjichambis, & Konstantinos Korfiatis. (2015). How Students’ Values Are Intertwined with Decisions in a Socio-Scientific Issue. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10(3):493–513. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2015.256a.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016. Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Kebudayaan. Retrieved from https://bnsp-indonesia.org/wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_Nomor022_Lampiran.pdf.

Prastowo, Andi. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Sadler, Troy D., & Dana L. Zeidler. (2005). Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42(1):112–38. doi: 10.1002/tea.20042.

Suhaudi, Agus Jauhari dau Audi. (2010). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Secara Kelompok Kooperatif Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains 15(1):13–17.

Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, Dorothy S. Semmel, & Melvyn I. Semmel. (1976). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Journal of School Psychology 14(1):75. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2.

Wenning, Carl J. (2005). Levels of Inquiry: Hierarchies of Pedagogical Practices and Inquiry Processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online 2(3):3–11.

Wenning, Carl J. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching Wenning (2010) for Explications of Real-World Applications Component of the Inquiry Spectrum. A Levels of Inquiry Redux. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2):9–16.

Wijaya, Etistika Yuni, Dwi Agus Sudjimat, & Amat Nyoto. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2016, 263–78.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Afandi, A., Titin, T., & Setyawati, Y. (2021). Konstruksi Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Levels of Inquiry disertai Socio-Scientific Issues untuk Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah: (Construction Levels of Inquiry Model Learning Tools accompanied Socio-Scientific Issues for Problem Solving Skills). BIODIK, 7(4), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i4.13777