Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Persaingan Usaha dengan Terciptanya Pengadilan Persaingan Usaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v6i1.40960Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Dispute Resolution, Business Competition, Business Competition CourtAbstract
In the context of trade, rivalry or business competition is an inevitable phenomenon in a country's economic ecosystem. Competition law is an important tool in a market economy, because through this tool the government seeks to protect fair competition between economic actors in the market. The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) was established based on Law Number 5 of 1999. This research uses normative legal research methods. Normative legal research method is library research conducted by examining library documents or secondary data. By applying the deductive method, which is a way of thinking that draws conclusions based on general matters that have been proven correct, and these conclusions are applied to special matters. The issuance of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, changes in provisions related to the points of change in articles 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 and the abolition of Article 49. These changes also create legal uncertainty regarding ongoing adjustments, especially regarding the provisions of administrative sanctions and changes to the main criminal sanctions. The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in investigating reports of unfair business competition relies on indirect evidence. The reason is that the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) does not have the authority to conduct investigations, searches, and seizures in investigating business competition cases. This causes the decision to not be able to reflect and realise legal certainty. For this reason, it is necessary to have a judicial body that specifically handles business competition issues to enforce the law and ensure legal certainty of business competition.
Downloads
References
Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis), (Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 2002).
A.A Gede Angga Putra Suardana dan I Gusti Ayu Agung Ari Krisnawati, “Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Terkait Pemeriksaan Keberatan Putusan Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha”, E-Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Desa 9, no. 10 (2021), https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthadesa/article/view/79595.
Alum Simbolon, “Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 20, no. 3 (2008), https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16123.
Ariyadi, I. Gede Yudhi, A. A. G. A. Dharmakusuma, dan Suatra Putrawan, “Mekanisme Permohonan Pernyataan Pailit Melalui Pengadilan Niaga”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya 4, no. 2 (2016), https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/19085.
Baiq Ervina Sapitri, “Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dengan Negara-negara Common Law System)”, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 3, no. 1 (2015), https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v3i7.204.
Devi Meyliana, Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Studi Konsep Pembuktian terhadap Perjanjian Penetapan Harga dalam Persaingan Usaha, (Malang: Setara Press, 2013).
Dwi F. Mokoagow, Ronny A. Maramis, Grace H. Tampongangoy, “Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Perkara Persaingan Usaha Berdasarkan Keputusan KPPU”, Jurnal Le Privatum 11, no. 2 (2023), https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/46521.
Fairuz Zahirah Zihni Hamdan, Suseno, Anjas Putra Pramudito dan Nalendra Pradipto, “Upaya Keberatan atas Putusan KPPU ke Pengadilan Niaga: Pembaharuan Berkepastian Hukum”, Jurnal Media Iuris 6, no. 1 (2023), https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i1.26393.
Fence M Wantu, “Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Putusan Hakim di Peradilan Perdata”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 3 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121.
Galuh Puspaningrum, Herowati Poesoko, L. Budi Kagramanto dan Dominikus Rato, “The Characteristic of Business Competition Supervisory Commission in Indonesian Legal System Heading to Society 5.0 Era”, Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ) 8, no. 3 (2020), https://doi.org/10.31364/scirj/v8.i3.2020.p0320753.
Gloria Damaiyanti Sidauruk, “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, no. 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss1.art10.
I Gusti Ngurah Adnyana, “Upaya Hukum Keberatan dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 18, no. 1 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v18i1.1114.
Irna Irmalina Daud, “Evaluasi terhadap Fungsi dan Kedudukan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU)”, Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi 2, no. 1 (2006), https://doi.org/10.21002/JKE.V2I1.117.
Junaidi, “Legal Certainty for The Authority of The Commission For The Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU) In The Settlement of Business Competition Disputes”, Proceedings from the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights (ICLHR), 14-15 April 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia, http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-4-2021.2312306.
Maarthen Y. Tampanguma, “Tinjauan Yuridis Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum”, Jurnal Lex Administratum 9, no. 3 (2021), https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/33219.
Mahmul Siregar, “Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 13, no. 2 (2018), https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i2.910.
Meita Fadhilah, “Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial”, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.217.
Miftahul Huda, “Hak Atas Memperoleh Kepastian Hukum dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha melalui Telaah Bukti Tidak Langsung”, Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia 11, no. 2 (2020), https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.
Muhammad Habib, Apik Hadiarlamsyah, Lutfizar Wahyu Pramukti Sunardi dan Wery Chesar, “Perkembangan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Pasca Berlakunya Perpu Cipta Kerja”, Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023), http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6569.
Mudzakkir, “Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Tindak Pidana Biasa Penanganannya Luar Biasa (Corruption Court: Common Crime with Extraordinary Reduction)”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 8, no. 2 (2011), https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v8i2.360
Nazaruddin Lathif, “Teori Hukum sebagai Sarana Alat untuk Memperbaharui atau Merekayasa Masyarakat”, Jurnal Palar: Pakuan Law Review 3, no. 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v3i1.402.
Osgar Sahim Matompo, “Penegakan Hukum dalam Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Legal Standing 3, no. 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v3i1.2945.
Patih Ahmad Rafie, M. Martindo Merta dan Junaidi, “Sosialisasi Kebijakan KPPU Terkait Sinergi BUMN: Memastikan Persaingan Usaha yang Sehat dan Berkeadilan”, PRIMA: Portal Riset dan Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat 3, no. 1 (2023), https://doi.org/10.55047/prima.v3i1.1035
Siti Anisah, “Permasalahan Seputar Tata Cara Pengajuan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan KPPU”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 24, no. 2 (2005), https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1683975.
Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011).
Susanti Adi Nugroho, Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2014).
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha yang Tidak Sehat
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja
Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang
Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 44 Tahun 2021 tentang Pelaksanaan Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 tentang Tata Cara Pengajuan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha
Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Junaidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All material published on Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
