Klausula Eksonerasi Pada Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Uang Dalam Layanan Pinjaman Online (Fintech Peer To Peer Lending)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to discuss legal issues, namely the void of norms because POJK No.77/POJK.01/2016 concerning information technology-based money-lending services with the terms and conditions of fintech p2p lending providers are not in line with their practices and can cause legal problems because there is no protection. law for lenders in the practice of online lending and borrowing money services so that it can lead to legal conflicts and the absence of legal certainty or special rules regarding the transfer of responsibility from the organizer, of course, is quite detrimental to its users (lenders). Based on the issues studied, the authors use a type of normative legal research which studies legal materials, both primary and secondary legal materials. Normative research places law as a system of norms because this type of research looks at aspects of understanding a legal norm contained in a law and norms that live and develop in society. The nature of the research used is analytical descriptive, the author tries to describe events and incidents that are the center of attention without giving special treatment to these events. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the inclusion of exoneration clauses related to information technology-based money lending and borrowing agreements, but OJK provisions do not explicitly regulate the legal consequences of including exoneration clauses so that there is a void in norms and can lead to legal conflicts so that harmonization of these norms is necessary.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All material published on Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Candrika dan Radita Putri, “Tanggung Gugat Penyelenggara Peer to Peer Lending Jika Penerima Pinjaman Melakukan Wanprestasiâ€, Jurisdiction, Vol.1, No.2 (2018).
Chintya, Anjani Ida Ayu Maharani dan I Wayan Novy Purwanto, “Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Pencantuman Klausula Ekonomi Pada Nota Laundryâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,Vol.2, No.1.
Iman, Nofie. Financial Technology dan Lembaga Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Gathering Mitra Linkage Bank Syariah Mandiri,2016.
Indrajit, Richardus Eko. E-Commerce: Kiat dan Strategi Bisnis di Dunia Maya. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2011.
Pamonang, Amos Jonggi, “Perlindungan Hukum Debitur dalam Penyelenggaraan Finansial Peer to Peer Lendingâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.2, No.1 (2021).
Putra, I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Tri Wahyudi, “Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Jasa Laundry Desa Ketewel Kecamatan Sukawatiâ€, Kerta Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.3, No.3.
Rumondang, Astri. “Fintech: Inovasi Sistem Keuangan di Era Digitalâ€, Yayasan Kita Menulis (2019).
Sitompul, Meline Gerarita. “Urgensi Legalitas Financial Technology(Fintech): Peer to Peer Lending di Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Yuridis Unaja, Vol.1, No.2 (2018).
Sri Mamudji, Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Cet.3, Jakarta: Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata
Undang Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perububahan Atas Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layananan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1 POJK/07/2013 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 18/POJK.07/2018 Tentang Layanan Pengaduan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan.