AI Tools in Academic Writing: Indonesian EFL Students' Perspective

Authors

  • Ayesha Suhail Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Chondro Nur Alim Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Christinelle Valmeo Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v10i1.56973

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Academic writing, EFL students, AI literacy, Academic integrity

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore Indonesian EFL students’ beliefs and challenges regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in academic English writing. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving a descriptive survey of 112 students from the English Education Department at Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data provided an overview of students’ AI usage patterns, while qualitative data offered deeper insights into their experiences and perceptions. The findings revealed that students generally held positive attitudes toward AI tools and used them for idea generation, grammar checking, vocabulary enhancement, and text organisation. AI tools were also perceived to increase confidence and reduce writing anxiety, supporting both cognitive and affective aspects of learning. However, participants expressed concerns about overreliance on AI, the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content, issues of originality, and academic integrity. Importantly, students demonstrated awareness of these limitations and emphasised the need for critical evaluation when using AI. The findings highlight the importance of integrating AI literacy into academic writing instruction and establishing clear institutional guidelines for the ethical and responsible use of AI. Overall, AI should be viewed not as a replacement for learners’ efforts but as a supportive tool that can enhance academic writing when used critically and responsibly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152

Aghajani, M., & Amanzadeh, H. (2017). The effect of anxiety on speaking ability: An experimental study on EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(7), 154–264.

Anandari, C. L. (2015). Indonesian EFL students' anxiety in speech production: Possible causes and remedy. TEFLIN Journal, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i1/1-16

Ariyanti, A. (2017). Foreign language anxiety in academic writing. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v17i1.815

Aubrey, S. (2011). Facilitating interaction in East Asian EFL classrooms: Increasing students' willingness to communicate. Language Education in Asia, 2(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/11/V2/I2/A06/Aubrey

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, 14.

Chen, Y., & Zou, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 1–15.

Cheng, Y.-S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). Sage.

Hidayat, A., & Sujarwati, I. (2024). Students' attitude toward OpenAI ChatGPT in writing academic articles. EEJ: English Journal for Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 1–15. https://jurnal.uinsyahada.ac.id/index.php/EEJ/article/view/10852

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Huang, Y. (2022). A corpus-based study on the semantic use of reporting verbs in English majors' undergraduate thesis writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.17

Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2021). A study of using an e-writing instructional design program to develop English writing ability of Thai EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 14(6), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n6p43

Kessler, G. (2022). Computer-assisted language learning, AI and language learning: Opportunities and challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 1–15.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Li, Z., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Automated feedback in writing development. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 185–204.

Lim, T., Gottipati, S., & Cheong, M. L. F. (2023). Ethical considerations for artificial intelligence in educational assessments. In Creative AI tools and ethical implications in teaching and learning (pp. 32–79). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0205-7.ch003

Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence in education. UCL Institute of Education Press.

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 345–367.

Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of AI: The challenge of ChatGPT and automated paraphrasing tools. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(2), 115–130.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Sipayung, N., Luhtfiyyah, L., & Rozak, R. (2025). The academic integrity in the use of AI-assisted academic writing: University students' perspectives and practices. JELITA, 6(2), 600–611.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235.

Zawacki-Richter, O. (2019). Systematic review of research on AI in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39–59.

Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2024). Risks of AI dependence in language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(2), 145–162.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Suhail, A., Nur Alim, C., & Valmeo, C. (2026). AI Tools in Academic Writing: Indonesian EFL Students’ Perspective. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 10(1), 433-454. https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v10i1.56973

Most read articles by the same author(s)