QUALITY CONTROL ANALYSIS OF PEW ENAMEL WIRE USING PARETO AND FISHBONE

Authors

  • Jason Hermanto Violentisca Hermanto Bandung
  • Katlea Fitriani Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jbsmr.v9i2.57992

Keywords:

Quality control, TQM, Check Sheet, Pareto chart, Fishbone Diagram

Abstract

PT Cakra Wire is a manufacturing company that produces enamel wire for various industrial applications, such as electric motors, transformers, and other electromagnetic devices. During the production process, the company faces quality issues and defective products, which potentially increase production costs and reduce process efficiency. Production data from January to February 2026 indicate that PEW type enamel wire exhibits a relatively high defect rate compared to other product types. This situation necessitates an analysis of the types of defects occurring and the factors contributing to their formation during the production process. The aim of this study is to identify the types of defects in PEW enamel wire, determine the dominant defect type, and analyze the underlying causes. A descriptive research design employing a mixed-methods approach was selected. Data collection involved observations, interviews, document analysis, and the evaluation of operational records regarding product defects from January to February 2026. The analysis was conducted using specific instruments from the "Seven Quality Tools" check sheets, Pareto charts, and cause-and-effect diagrams. The results reveal three main types of defects in PEW products rough surface texture, severe wire breaks (non-compliant with standards), and surface irregularities. Pareto analysis identifies rough surface texture as the dominant defect type. Cause-and-effect analysis demonstrates that these defects are influenced by factors related to man, machine, method, and material. Consequently, the company must strengthen production process monitoring, perform regular machine maintenance, intensify material inspection, and improve adherence to established work procedures by operating personnel. These findings are expected to provide the company with valuable insights for increasing the effectiveness of quality control and reducing defect rates.

 

Keywords: Quality control, TQM, Check Sheet, Pareto chart, and Fishbone Diagram.

References

Abdullah, M., & Si, M. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta : Aswaja Pressindo. Abidin, A. A.,

Wahyudin, W., Fitriani, R., Astuti, F., Teknik, F., & Karawang, U. S. (2022). Analisis

Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Roti dengan Metode Seven Tools di UMKM Anni Bakery and Cake. 21(1),

52–63.

Arianti, M. S., Rahmawati, E., & Prihatiningrum, R. R. Y. (2020). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Produk

Dengan Menggunakan Statistical Quality Control (SQC) Pada. 9(2), 13.

Bastuti, S., Kurnia, D., & Sumantri, A. (2018). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Proses Hot Press Pada Produk

Cacat Outsole Menggunakan Metode Statistical Processing Control (SPC) dan Failure Mode Effect and

Analysis (FMEA) Di PT. KMK Global Sports 2. 1, 72–79.

Bawalaksana. (2025). Peran Sektor Manufaktur dalam Mendongrak Petumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia 2025.

https://bawalaksana.id/peran-sektor-manufaktur-terhadap-pertumbuhan-ekonomi/

Bozarth, C. C., & Handfield, R. B. (2019). Introduction To Opration And SUppy Chain Management. BPS.

(2024). Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan 1-2024 Tumbuh 5,11%. https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2024/05/06/2380/ekonomi-indonesia-triwulan-i-2024-tumbuh-5-

11-persen--y-on-y--dan-ekonomi-indonesia-triwulan-i-2024-terkontraksi-0-83-persen--q-to-q--.html

Dale, B., Bamford, D., & Wiele, T. van der. (2016). Managing Quality An Essential Guide And Reseource

Gateway.

Dwi Oktareza, Andreyan Noor, Erliyando Saputra, & Aulia Vivi Yulianingrum. (2024). Transformasi Digital

4.0: Inovasi yang Menggerakkan Perubahan Global. Cendekia : Jurnal Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora,

2(3), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v2i3.98

Harahap, F. B., Junita, A., & Meutia, T. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia, Partisipasi. 4(1),

170–180.

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (n.d.). T WELF T H EDIT ION OPER AT IONS.

Islamiyani, A., Aspiranti, T., Cintyawati, C., Manajemen, P., Ekonomi, F., & Islam, U. (2023). Analisis

Pengendalian Kualitas Produk dengan Menggunakan Metode Statistical Quality Control ( SQC ) untuk

Mengurangi Produk Cacat. 964–976. ISO/IEC 7816-11:2022. (2022). SO/IEC 7816-11:2022. 3, 25.

https://www.iso.org/standard/78382.html

Juran, J. M., & Feo, J. A. De. (2010). Juran’s Quality Handbook : The Complete Guidr Perfomance

Excellence.

Kemenperin. (2024). Kementrian Perindustrian Republik Indonesia. https://kemenperin.go.id/

Lubis, F. S., Hitari, B. G. F., & Wahyuni, A. S. (2023). Pengendalian Produk Cacat Menggunakan Metode

Seven Tools untuk Meningkatkan. 10(2), 774–778.

Marlina, W. A., Arasid, D. W., Produk, T. D., & Puluh, K. L. (2024). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Dengan

Menggunakan Metode Seven Tools Di Usaha Gula Aren Saka Halaban Sumatera Barat Quality Control

Analysis Using The Seven Tools Method In Saka Aren Sugar Business Terdapat berbagai metode

pengendalian yang dapat digunaka. 09(01).

Maspioh, P., Fasa, N., Dandy, R., & Sumitra, N. R. (2026). The Application of Seven Tools to Improve

Quality and Prevent Defects in the Instrument Panel Production Process at PT . Automotive Industry.

XI(1), 17175–17184.

Muhazir, A., Sinaga, Z., & Yusanto, A. A. (2020). Analisis Penurunan Defect Pada Proses Manufaktur

Komponen Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Metode Failure Mode And Effect Analysis ( FMEA ). 5(2), 66–

77.

Murdifin Haming dan mahrud nurnajamuddin. (2022). Manajemen Produksi Modern. 3(2), 453.

https://books.google.co.id/books?id=fZ5kEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_

r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Neyestani. (2017). Seven Basic Tools of Quality Control : The Appropriate Techniques for Solving Quality

Problems in the Organizations.

Prastiyo, R. A., Wasiur Rizqi, A., & Jufriyanto, M. (2023). Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Kayu di CV.

Berdikari Sukses dengan Menggunakan Metode Seven Quality Tools. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 8(3),

6752–6760. https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v8i3.6541

Purwanto, H., Mahyunis, & Hartanti, P. S. (2025). No Title. 7(2), 141–154.

Ramadhan, A. W., Gemilang, G. S., Pulungan, J. Z., Dwi, R., Islam, U., & Sumatera, N. (2025). Total

Quality Management (TQM) Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Operasional. 3, 445–454.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill Building Approach. Tth Edition.

United Kingdom : John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Singh, D. S. (n.d.). No Title. https://medicearth.in/total-quality-management/cost-of-quality-in-healthcare-

turning-errors-into-opportunities/

Suhardi, A. R. (2021). Quality Control to Reduce Defects in Amlodipine and Salbutamol Pharmaceutical

Products : A Geography Case Study on Indonesia Pharmaceutical Industry. 11(3), 150–162.

https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo

Tenny, B., Tamengkel, L. F., & Mukuan, D. D. S. (2018). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Mutu Produk

Sebelum Eksport Dengan Mengunakan Metode Six Sigma Pada. 6(4), 28–35.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

QUALITY CONTROL ANALYSIS OF PEW ENAMEL WIRE USING PARETO AND FISHBONE. (2026). Journal of Business Studies and Management Review, 9(2), 373-382. https://doi.org/10.22437/jbsmr.v9i2.57992