Cohesive Devices in EFL Students' Essays and Problems Encountered during Writing

Authors

  • Rita Zahara Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Iskandar Abdul Samad Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v7i1.23128

Abstract

The research investigated the cohesive devices used in EFL students' recount texts and the problems encountered during their writing. 33 high school students' essays were analyzed, and the students were interviewed. The findings showed that all five types of cohesive devices appeared in the students' writings, with reference the most, followed by a conjunction, lexical cohesion, ellipsis, and substitution the least. Three types of cohesive devices were identified as problematic to the students: conjunction, reference, and lexical cohesion. Four reasons were further found for the students' difficulty in using the cohesive devices: pure error, absence of knowledge, overuse, and lack of writing practice. These findings may give new insights for language teachers in the attempt to understand the causes that lead to cohesion problems in students' writing so that proper measures can be taken to address them and improve the quality of their writing generally.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rita Zahara, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

 

 

 

Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

 

 

Iskandar Abdul Samad, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

 

 

Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Malaysia

 

 

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Zahara, R. ., Yusuf, Y. Q., Samad, I. A. ., & Singh, C. K. S. . (2023). Cohesive Devices in EFL Students’ Essays and Problems Encountered during Writing. Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|, 7(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v7i1.23128