Analysis of the Substance of Regional Regulation Policies Concerning Waste Management
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the regional regulations that emerged as a form of implementation of the mandate of Law Number 18 of 2008 is Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2017 concerning Waste Management issued by the Kudus Regency Government. This article aims to examine and assess the content of waste management policies in Kudus Regency. This is important to do considering that the success of a policy can be seen, one of the ways, from the contents of the policy. This article only focuses on the content of policy using Merilee S. Grindle's model, which consists of six aspects, namely: interests affected, type of benefits, extent of change envisions, site of decision making, program implementor, and resources committed. Types of normative juridical research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The primary data source is the policy of Kudus Regency Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2017 concerning Waste Management, while the secondary data is in the form of journals related to waste management. The results of the analysis show that: the formation of regional regulations takes into account the physical, biological, social environment and juridical reasons (interest affected); the benefits of regional regulations are making the environment cleaner and healthier, as well as making people aware of the surrounding environment, more disciplined and more empowered in managing waste (type of benefits); the expected changes are improving environmental quality, improving public health, and changing people's mindset and behavior towards waste (extent of change envisions); the decision-making position is the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) of Kudus Regency with the joint approval of the Kudus Regent (site of decision making); implementing the policy, namely the Public Works Department (DPU) (program implementor); Policy resources consist of five components, namely man, materials, methods, machines, and money (committed resources).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights, and this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License) (CC.BY.4.0).
References
Adnyana, Yudistira, Sri Sulandari, and I W Astawa. “Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Sumber.” Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi 11, no. 1 (2023).
Fadzoli, Toif, Rahayu Subekti, and Waluyo. “Dampak Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Sebagai Parameter Kinerja Pemerintah Dalam Bidang Lingkungan Hidup.” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara 1, no. 3 (2023).
Heryanti, Febriana, Gatot Subroto, Sri Sulastri, Nur Hidayat, Mahsun Ismail, and Achmad Taufik. “Tinjauan Hukum Undang-Undang Pengelolaan Sampah Terhadap Pencemaran Lingkungan.” Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 9, no. 2 (2023).
Iqbal, Mohamad, R M Mulyadin, Kuncoro Ariawan, and Subarudi. “Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Di Provinsi DKI Jakarta.” Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan 19, no. 2 (2022).
Jahariyah, Nur Anim, Mahmudah, Pipit Hariyono, and Ana Aniati. “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Skala Rumah Tangga Untuk Mewujudkan Kabupaten Banyuwangi Sehat.” LOYALITAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 5, no. 2 (2022).
Kahfi, Ashtabula. “Tinjauan Terhadap Pengelolaan Sampah.” Jurisprudentie Journal 4, no. 1 (2017).
Kusumaningrum, Lia, Kiki Dwi Wulandari, Faradilah Farid Karim, and Nurika Arum Sari. “Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah Di Kabupaten Kudus Oleh Dinas Perumahan, Kawasan Permukiman Dan Lingkungan Hidup (PKPLH).” Community Development Journal 4, no. 3 (2023).
Mubarok, Syahrul, Soesilo Zauhar, Endah Setyowati, and Suryadi Suryadi. “Policy Implementation Analysis: Exploration of George Edward III, Merilee S Grindle, and Mazmanian and Sabatier Theories in the Policy Analysis Triangle Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Studies 5, no. 1 (2020): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2020.005.01.7.
Mulasari, Surahma Asti, Adi Heru Husodo, and Noeng Muhadjir. “Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Domestik.” Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional 8, no. 8 (2014).
Purnomo, Armando Tri Cahyo, Septi Puspitasari Gulo, Nilam Permatasari, and Irman. “Application Of Preventive In Action Principles In Dealing With Waste In The Cooperative Market Area.” MENDAPO: Journal of Administration Law 4, no. 3 (2023).
Sa’ban, L.M. Azhar, Nastia, and Syahril Darmah. “Implementasi Peraturan Daerah Nomor 17 Tahun 2012 Tentang Retribusi Pelayanan Persampahan Atau Kebersihan (Studi Kasus Kelurahan Bukit Wolio Indah Kecamatan Wolio Kota Baubau).” JIP: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian 4, no. 1 (2023).
Simbolon, Arnektus, Budiman Ginting, Rosnidar Sembiring, and Yefrizawati. “Efektivitas Tata Kelola Pengelolaan Sampah Menurut Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Di Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah.” Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa: Hukum, Sosial, Ekonomi 3, no. 2 (2023).
Sudiantha, Yohanes, Christia Meidiana, and Dadang Meru Utomo. “Efektivitas Kinerja Sistem Pengumpulan Sampah Di Kecamatan Singosari.” Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal 6, no. 4 (2017).
Ulhaq, Najla Hikmalia Dhiyaa. “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Dan Identifikasi Temuan Program Dalam Penanganan Sampah Di Kabupaten Jepara.” JISHUM: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 1, no. 4 (2023).
Wachid, Abdul, and David Laksamana Caesar. “Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Di Kabupaten Kudus.” Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 6, no. 2 (2020).