Between Informal Engagement and Classroom Passivity:
Understanding EFL Investment in Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v10i1.56696Keywords:
Language investment, Classroom passivity, Moral legitimacy, Pesantren, EFL learningAbstract
This study explores the challenges influencing students’ investment in Indonesian Islamic boarding schools (pesantren), and how students negotiate these challenges. Drawing on Darvin and Norton’s (2015) model of investment, it examines qualitative data from focus group discussions with 29 students and semi-structured interviews with three English teachers from three pesantren schools in West Java. The findings reveal a discrepancy between learners’ high informal engagement with English and their limited classroom participation, which cannot be explained simply by low motivation or limited proficiency. In this context, learners’ investment is influenced by institutional regulations, pedagogical constraints, examination priorities, and moral discourses that frame English as both opportunity and ethical risk. Some cases show how learners may remain highly invested in English while strategically limiting their classroom participation when existing forms of engagement did not align with their aspirations or values. These cases suggest that classroom passivity may reflect a calculated negotiation rather than a lack of interest in the language. Theoretically, the findings add depth to existing investment theory by demonstrating how both teachers and learners in religious educational settings negotiate the perceived benefits of English against moral legitimacy. Pedagogically, the findings call for more dialogic approaches that recognise learners’ informal English experiences while remaining respectful to the moral boundaries. While serving as pedagogical filters to ensure the propriety of learning content, EFL teachers can design low-stakes communicative activities that encourage active communication and reflection for critical language awareness.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Chang, Y. (2016). Discourses, identities and investment in English as a second language learning: Voices from two U.S. community college students. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(4), 38–49.
Chowdhury, R. (2019). Desiring the English subject: Neoliberalism, language and the politics of belonging in Bangladesh. Multilingual Matters.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching, 56(1), 29–40.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191
Fajaryani, N., Masbirorotni, Nuraini, Nafrial, & Nopianti. (2018). Different madrasah, but the same stories: Academic and non-academic challenges encountered by teachers in teaching a foreign language. Journal Islamic Education, 23(1), 65–86.
Farid, A., & Lamb, M. (2020). English and Islamic identity in Indonesia: A study of the discourses of English in Islamic higher education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(5), 330– 344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1764607
Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
Habibi, A., Sofwan, M., & Mukminin, A. (2016). English teaching implementation in Indonesian
pesantrens: Teachers’ demotivation factors. Proceedings of the 2nd SULE – IC 2016, FKIP, UNSRI, Palembang, 2(1), 129–143.
Hidayati, T. (2016). English language teaching in Islamic education in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Englisia, 3(2), 65–82.
Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities: Introduction. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0204_1
Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups, a practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587739
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
Marzulina, L., Harto, K., Erlina, D., Holandyah, M., Desvitasari, D., Arnilawati, A., Fridiyanto, F., & Mukminin, A. (2021). Challenges in teaching English for EFL learners at pesantren: Teachers’ voices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.10
McKay, S. L., & Wang, H. (1996). An exploratory study of Chinese EFL learners’ investment in English. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 7–11.
Murtisari, E. T., & Mali, Y. C. (2017). Impact of English on the Indonesian language and culture: High school students’ perceptions. Studies about Languages, 30, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.30.17570
Nghia, N. (2020). Imagined community, imagined identity, and investment in language learning: An autoethnographical account. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(3), 118–129.
Norton, B. (1993). Language learning, social identity, and immigrant women [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto, Canada.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
Norton, B. (2021). Identity and investment in multilingual classrooms. Language Teaching, 54(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000151
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587803
Palmer, R., & Chodidjah, I. (2012). Teaching English in Indonesian pesantren: Issues of identity and pedagogy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 213–228.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Roller, M., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Press.
Sellami, A. (2006). The teaching of English in Islamic education: Issues and approaches. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470608668883
Skourdoumbis, A., & Madkur, A. (2020). Symbolic capital and the problem of navigating English language teacher practice: The case of Indonesian pesantren. TESOL in Context, 29(2), 15– 34.
Songbatumis, A. M. (2017). Challenges in teaching English faced by English teachers at MTsN Taliwang, Indonesia. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 54–67.
Umar, U. (2022). English language teaching in Pesantren in Indonesia: Development and challenges. Journal of English Language and Literature (JELL), 7(1), 55–64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Language Teaching and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to International Journal of Language Teaching and Education (IJoLTe) and Magister Program of English Education Department, Universitas Jambi as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
IJoLTe keep the rights to articles that have been published. And, the authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link of IJoLTe' website. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from IJoLTe with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
IJoLTe and Magister Program of English Education Department, Universitas Jambi, and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in IJoLTe are the sole and responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors who submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. IJoLTe will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. IJoLTe will only communicate with the corresponding author.
By submitting the article/manuscript to this journal, the authors agree with this policy and consciously agree that IJoLTe does not provide royalties or other fees to the authors for their published articles. By agreeing this policy, IJoLTe ensures that published articles are publicly accessible and will be free of charge for the readers. No specific document sign-off is required.
Users of this website will be licensed to use materials from this website following the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Please use the materials accordingly
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.














