Between Informal Engagement and Classroom Passivity:

Understanding EFL Investment in Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools

Authors

  • Herlin Putri Indah Destari Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v10i1.56696

Keywords:

Language investment, Classroom passivity, Moral legitimacy, Pesantren, EFL learning

Abstract

This study explores the challenges influencing students’ investment in Indonesian Islamic boarding schools (pesantren), and how students negotiate these challenges. Drawing on Darvin and Norton’s (2015) model of investment, it examines qualitative data from focus group discussions with 29 students and semi-structured interviews with three English teachers from three pesantren schools in West Java. The findings reveal a discrepancy between learners’ high informal engagement with English and their limited classroom participation, which cannot be explained simply by low motivation or limited proficiency. In this context, learners’ investment is influenced by institutional regulations, pedagogical constraints, examination priorities, and moral discourses that frame English as both opportunity and ethical risk. Some cases show how learners may remain highly invested in English while strategically limiting their classroom participation when existing forms of engagement did not align with their aspirations or values. These cases suggest that classroom passivity may reflect a calculated negotiation rather than a lack of interest in the language. Theoretically, the findings add depth to existing investment theory by demonstrating how both teachers and learners in religious educational settings negotiate the perceived benefits of English against moral legitimacy. Pedagogically, the findings call for more dialogic approaches that recognise learners’ informal English experiences while remaining respectful to the moral boundaries. While serving as pedagogical filters to ensure the propriety of learning content, EFL teachers can design low-stakes communicative activities that encourage active communication and reflection for critical language awareness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chang, Y. (2016). Discourses, identities and investment in English as a second language learning: Voices from two U.S. community college students. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(4), 38–49.

Chowdhury, R. (2019). Desiring the English subject: Neoliberalism, language and the politics of belonging in Bangladesh. Multilingual Matters.

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching, 56(1), 29–40.

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191

Fajaryani, N., Masbirorotni, Nuraini, Nafrial, & Nopianti. (2018). Different madrasah, but the same stories: Academic and non-academic challenges encountered by teachers in teaching a foreign language. Journal Islamic Education, 23(1), 65–86.

Farid, A., & Lamb, M. (2020). English and Islamic identity in Indonesia: A study of the discourses of English in Islamic higher education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(5), 330– 344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1764607

Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.

Habibi, A., Sofwan, M., & Mukminin, A. (2016). English teaching implementation in Indonesian

pesantrens: Teachers’ demotivation factors. Proceedings of the 2nd SULE – IC 2016, FKIP, UNSRI, Palembang, 2(1), 129–143.

Hidayati, T. (2016). English language teaching in Islamic education in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Englisia, 3(2), 65–82.

Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities: Introduction. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0204_1

Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups, a practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587739

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.

Marzulina, L., Harto, K., Erlina, D., Holandyah, M., Desvitasari, D., Arnilawati, A., Fridiyanto, F., & Mukminin, A. (2021). Challenges in teaching English for EFL learners at pesantren: Teachers’ voices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.10

McKay, S. L., & Wang, H. (1996). An exploratory study of Chinese EFL learners’ investment in English. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 7–11.

Murtisari, E. T., & Mali, Y. C. (2017). Impact of English on the Indonesian language and culture: High school students’ perceptions. Studies about Languages, 30, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.30.17570

Nghia, N. (2020). Imagined community, imagined identity, and investment in language learning: An autoethnographical account. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(3), 118–129.

Norton, B. (1993). Language learning, social identity, and immigrant women [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto, Canada.

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309

Norton, B. (2021). Identity and investment in multilingual classrooms. Language Teaching, 54(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000151

Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587803

Palmer, R., & Chodidjah, I. (2012). Teaching English in Indonesian pesantren: Issues of identity and pedagogy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 213–228.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Roller, M., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Press.

Sellami, A. (2006). The teaching of English in Islamic education: Issues and approaches. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470608668883

Skourdoumbis, A., & Madkur, A. (2020). Symbolic capital and the problem of navigating English language teacher practice: The case of Indonesian pesantren. TESOL in Context, 29(2), 15– 34.

Songbatumis, A. M. (2017). Challenges in teaching English faced by English teachers at MTsN Taliwang, Indonesia. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 54–67.

Umar, U. (2022). English language teaching in Pesantren in Indonesia: Development and challenges. Journal of English Language and Literature (JELL), 7(1), 55–64.

https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v7i1.143

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Destari, H. P. I. (2026). Between Informal Engagement and Classroom Passivity:: Understanding EFL Investment in Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 10(1), 371-384. https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v10i1.56696