Determinants of Accrual Based Government Accounting Standards (SAP): Study at The Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD) of Jambi City and Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency

Authors

  • Nurhasniwati Alumni Magister Ilmu Akuntansi Universitas Jambi
  • Mukhzarudfa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi
  • Enggar Diah PA Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi

Keywords:

Human Resources, Infrastructure, Information Technology, Accrual Based SAP Implementation

Abstract

This study aims to examine the factors that influence the implementation of government accounting standards, namely human resources, infrastructure and information technology in BPKAD Jambi City and Tanjung Jabung Barat District. This research is a survey research by distributing questionnaires directly to the sample as primary data. The sample technique used is purposive sampling. The sample in this study was the Head of Subdivision of Finance and Budget Users in BPKAD Jambi City and Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency. The analytical method used is multiple linear regression using the SPSS 24 application. The results of this study indicate that human resources, infrastructure and information technology simultaneously influence the implementation of accrual-based government accounting standards. Human resources and information technology affect the implementation of accrual-based government accounting standards. Infrastructure has no effect on the implementation of accrual-based government accounting standards. The magnitude of the influence of human resources, infrastructure and information technology with the implementation of accrual-based SAP of 64.9%, while the remaining 35.1% is influenced or explained by other variables not included in this research model. So that it can be stated to have a very strong closeness coefficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACFE. (2018). Report To The Nations 2018: Global Study on Occupational Fraud And Abuse. Asia-Pacific Edition.

AICPA. (1987). National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Treadway Commission). New York: Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial reporting.

Akbar, T. (2017). The Determination of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Causes by Using Pentagon Theory on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 14, Issue 5, ISSN 2289-1552, 106-113.

Amaliah, B. N., Januarsi, Y., & Ibrani, E. Y. (2015). Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory dalam Menjelaskan Earnings Management Non-GAAP pada Perusahaan Terpublikasi di Indonesia. JAAI Vo.19 No.1, 51-67.

Aprilia. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 9 (1), 2017, 101-132 ISSN:2541-0342.

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154-165.

Baridwan, Z. (2010). Intermediate Accounting. Edisi Ketujuh. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gajah Mada.

Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah Volume 13, Nomor 1, 114–134.

Cressey, D. R. (1950). The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Review, Vol. 15, No. 6, 738-743.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS Edisi Kelima. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Habib, A., Ranasinghe, D., Muhammadi, A., & Islam, A. (2018). Political connections, financial reporting and auditing: Survey of the empirical literature. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation Vol. 31. Elseiver.

Husmawati, P., Septriani, Y., Rosita, I., & Handayani, D. (2017). Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Statement (Study on Manufacturing Firms Listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia Period 2013-2016). International Conference of Applied Science on Engineering, Business, Linguistics ISSN : 2598-2532.

Indarto, S. L., & Ghozali, I. (2016). Fraud Diamond: Detection Analysis on The Fraudulent Financial Reporting. risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions / Volume 6, Issue 4, Fall 2016, Continued - 1.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, V. 3, No. 4, 305-360.

Markopolos, H. (2019, Agustus 15). General Electric, A Bigger Fraud than Enron. Diambil kembali dari www.gefraud.com.

Marks, J. T. (2014). Playing Offense in a High-Risk Environment "A Sophisticated Approach to Fighting Fraud". Crowe Horwath.

Matangkin, L., NG, S., & Mardiana, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kemampuan Manajerial dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Reaksi Investor dengan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan sebagai Variabel Mediasi. SiMAk Universitas Atma Jaya Vol. 16 No. 2, 182-209.

Mui, G., & Mailley, J. (2015). A tale of two triangles: comparing the Fraud Triangle with criminology’s Crime Triangle". Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 28 Iss 1, 45 – 58 .

Ngan, S. C. (2013). The impact of politically-connected executives in fraudulent financial reporting: Evidence based on the H shares. African Journal of Business Management Vol. 7(18), 1875-1884.

OJK. (2019, Juni 28). Siaran Pers : Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Berikan Sanksi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero )TBK. Diambil kembali dari ojk.go.id: https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Siaran-Pers--Otoritas-Jasa-Keuangan-Berikan-Sanksi-Kasus-Pt-Garuda-Indonesia-Persero-Tbk.aspx

Omar, N., & Din, H. F. (2011). Fraud diamond risk indicator: An assessment of its importance and usage. International Conference on Science and Social Research, 607-612.

Prasmaulida, S. (2016). Financial Statement Fraud Detection using Perpective of Fraud Triangle Adopted by SAS No.99. Asia Pasific Fraud Journal Volume 1, No.2nd Edition.

Puspitha, M. Y., & Yasa, G. W. (2018). Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Study on Indonesian Capital Market). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). ISSN 2307-4531.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Bisnis Politeknik Caltex Riau Vol. 11, No. 1, 11-23.

Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon: Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Listed di BEI Tahun 2014-2016. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(2).

Siddiq, F. R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar. (2017). Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. Seminar Nasional dan The 4th Call for Syariah Paper ISSN 2460-0784.

Sitorus, P. M., Firli, A., & Ramadhan, M. N. (2017). Pengaruh CEO Duality, Top Share dan Kepemilikan Asing Terhadap Earning Management (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Anggota Indeks LQ45 Periode 2013-2015). e-Proceeding of Management : Vol.4, No.3, 2410-2416.

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2008). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Sunardi, S., & Amin, M. (2018). Fraud detection of financial statement by using fraud diamond perspective. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, Vol. 7 No. 3, 878-891.

Ulfah, M., Nuraina, E., & Wijaya, A. L. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perbankan di Indonesia yang terdaftar di BEI). The 9th FIPA:Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi – Universitas PGRI Madiun Vol. 5 No. 1 e-ISSN: 2337-9723, 399-418.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal 74.12, 38-42.

Yen, S.-C. (2013). What Causes Fraudulent Financial Reporting? Evidence Based on H Shares. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol 49:sup4 ISSN 1540–496X, 254-266.

Zainudin, E. F., & Hashim, H. A. (2016). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using financial ratio. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 14 Issue: 2, 266-278.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-02

How to Cite

Nurhasniwati, Mukhzarudfa, & PA, E. D. (2020). Determinants of Accrual Based Government Accounting Standards (SAP): Study at The Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD) of Jambi City and Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Unja, 5(3), 145-157. Retrieved from https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jaku/article/view/10789

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>