The Practical Research of the Blended Learning Model Based on SPOC in Advanced Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v14i01.33338Keywords:
advanced mathematics, blended leaching, SPOC, teaching reformAbstract
Based on the current situation of advanced mathematics curriculum teaching, this study first constructs a blended learning model for advanced mathematics based on SPOC through literature research from three aspects: curriculum design, teaching implementation, and learning evaluation. And designs a specific blended teaching case combined with the "definite integral concept". Then, we conducted a purposeful sampling in a public school called Qinghai Normal University and selected 82 students from two first-year classes majoring in biotechnology as the research objects, and carried out an 18-week empirical study with experimental control. Finally, the final grades and teaching evaluation questionnaires of students in advanced mathematics were collected for data processing and analysis. The research results showed that students in the SPOC blended learning class had better math scores than those in the traditional teaching class, and blended learning could narrow the gap in students' math proficiency. At the same time, the questionnaire survey found that students believe that blended learning in advanced mathematics courses has abundant resources, frequent interaction and communication, and can improve learning efficiency. However, traditional advanced mathematics learning puts a lot of pressure, and they are busy taking notes in the classroom and cannot respond to the teacher's questions in time.
Downloads
References
Canal, M. N., de las Mercedes de Obesso, M., & Rivera, C. A. P. (2024). Does educators’ digital competence improve entrepreneurial students’ learning outcomes? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00921-x
Chen, C., & Niu, J. (2016). Empirical Study of Small-sized Class Teaching Experiment of University Mathematics: A Case Study at Sichuan University. Journal of Mathematics Education, 25(6).
Chen, C., & Niu, J. (2017). Comparing Effects of Small-Class Teaching and Large-Class Teaching on University Students’ Math Achievement. Journal of Mathematics Education, 26(5).
China, M. of E. of. (2022). Notice the release of two education industry standards for the smart education platform series.
Cojucaru, A.M., Cojucaru, M., Jianu, A., Bucea-Manea-tonis, R., Paun, D. G., & Ivan, P. (2022). The Impact of Agile Management and Technology in Teaching and Practicing Physical Education and Sports. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031237
De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. In Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579
Dunrong, B., & Fan, M. (2009). On student evaluation of teaching and improvement of the teaching quality assurance system at higher education institutions. Chinese Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932420212
El-Ariss, B., Zaneldin, E., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Using videos in blended e-learning for a structural steel design course. Education Sciences, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060290
Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. In Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2535918
Gao, H., & Chen, K. (2017). Research status and prospects of mathematical self-efficacy. Journal of Mathematics Education, 26(1).
Grévisse, C., Rothkugel, S., & Reuter, R. A. P. (2019). Scaffolding support through the integration of learning material. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0107-0
Gueye, K., Boko, U. H. S., Degboe, B. M., & Ouya, S. (2020). Contribution to the Setting of an Online Platform on Practical Application for the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): The Case of Medical Field. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 916, pp. 297–307). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_29
Kang, Z., & He, L. (2018). Construction and practice of SPOC teaching mode based on MOOC. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i12.9702
Law Kris, M. Y. (2019). Integrating a small private online course (SPOC) component in an undergraduate engineering management subject as a blended learning approach: A case in Hong Kong. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338147.3338170
Lee Jae Ik. (2017). A Study on Creative and Convergent STAD(Science, Technology, Arts, Design) education. The Korean Society of Science & Art, 30, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2017.09.30.335
Liu, S., & Zhu, B. (2016). Blended Learning Approach to Spoken English Teaching in M-learning. In X. Xiao, S. B. Tsai, & R. Feng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (Vol. 53, Issues 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE) CL-Sanya, PEOPLES R CHINA, pp. 149–152).
McAleese, R. (2003). Flexible learning in a digital world – experiences and expectations. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103852
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
Ministry of Education of China. (n.d.). Notice on doing a good job in deepening the reform of innovation and entrepreneurship education model universities stage summary work. In 2020.
Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111163913
Phillips, J. A., Schumacher, C., & Arif, S. (2016). Time spent, workload, and student and faculty perceptions in a blended learning environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe806102
Platonova, R. I., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Dautova, S. B., Martynenko, E. V., Kryukova, N. I., & Demir, S. (2022). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Diversifying Models and Practical Recommendations for Researchers. In Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.957199
Pye, G., Holt, D., Salzman, S., Bellucci, E., & Lombardi, L. (2015). Engaging diverse student audiences in contemporary blended learning environments in Australian higher business education: Implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v19i0.1251
Qiu, H., Li, Q., & Li, C. (2020). How technology facilitates tourism education in COVID-19 study of Nankai University. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, xxxx, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100288
Rosenthal, J. S. (1995). Active Learning Strategies in Advanced Mathematics Classes. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381723
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
Shan, Y. (2019). Action research on the construction of the cultural model in the college mathematics classroom. Shanxi Normal University.
Sharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. In ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq043
Siswono, T. Y. E., Kohar, A. W., Rosyidi, A. H., Hartono, S., Masriyah, & IOP. (2018). Searching for Authentic Context in Designing PISA-like Mathematics Problem: From Indoor to Outdoor Field Experience. In 2nd International Joint Conference On Science And Technology (IJCST) 2017 (Vol. 953, Issues 2nd International Joint Conference on Science and Technology (IJCST) CL-Bali State Polytechnic, Bali, Indonesia). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012197
Suleri, J. I., & Suleri, A. J. (2018). Comparing Virtual Learning, Classical Classroom Learning and Blended Learning. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejosdr/3970
Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B. T., Arshah, R. bin A., & Malik, S. I. (2020). Framework design of university communication model (UCOM) to enhance continuous intentions in teaching and e-learning process. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 817–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09984-2
Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Tingting Lu, N. W. (2016). No Title Research on Flipped Classroom Teaching Model based on SPOC+ digital teaching resource platform: A case study of Collage Englis. Chinese audio-visual education.
Wang, F., Wijaya, T. T., Rosa, S., & Lestariningrum, A. (2022). Exploring the Use of SPOCs in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic : A Case Study. IEEE 2nd International Conference on Educational Technology, 6-10.
Wang, R. (2023). Research on the effectiveness of college English blended teaching mode under small private online courses based on machine learning. SN Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05278-y
Wang, S., & Wang, L. (2014). Studies on Current Situation of Freshmen’s Attitudes Towards Mathematics in Ethnic Colleges and Universities. Journal of Mathematics Education, 23(5).
Xin-bing, L., Hui-yu, X., & Engstr, A. (2014). Problems and Improvements in Setting Mathematics Teaching Objectives. Journal of Mathematics Education, 23(05).
Xiuli, W., Qun, Y., & Yaqin, W. (2019). Exploration of the Integration of College Course Teaching and Network Teaching. In M. Kuek & Z. Ruimei (Eds.), Proceedings Of The Third International Symposium - Educational Research And Educational Technology, 2019 (Issues 3rd International Symposium on Educational Research and Educational Technology CL-Comp Knowledge & Technol Press, Hefei, Peoples R China, pp. 29–35).
Yin, H. (2015). Exploration of mixed teaching mode based on the SPOC platform in the post-MOOC period. Modern Educational Technology.
You, H., Zhu, W., & Lu, J. (2020). Email this article Print this article Exploration and the Development of the Blended Learning Model Based on MOOC in Advanced Mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(4).
Yugui, T. (2017). Teaching Pattern Research of Advanced Mathematics in the Perspective of Micro Lecture. In X. Chu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT 2017) (Vol. 101, Issues 4th International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT) CL-Hangzhou, Peoples R China, pp. 1215–1219).
Zaranis, N., & Exarchakos, G. M. (2018). The Use of ICT and Realistic Mathematics Education for Understanding Simple and Advanced Stereometry Shapes Among University Students. Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95059-4
Zeng, X. (2023). Application of BOPPPS teaching model in online and offline blended teaching of college Public Basic Mathematics. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00185
Zhao, G., Wang, B., Liu, J., & Wang, J. (2016). Microlessons in Chinese Universities: Concepts, Technology, and Case Analyses. In S. K. S. Cheung, L. F. Kwok, J. Shang, A. Wang, & R. Kwan (Eds.), Blended Learning: Aligning Theory With Practices, ICBL 2016 (Vol. 9757, Issues 9th International Conference on Blended Learning (ICBL) CL-Peking Univ, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA, pp. 73–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41165-1_7
Zirawaga, V., Olusanya, A., & Maduki, T. (2017). Gaming in education: Using games as a support tool to teach History. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(15), 55-64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fang Wang, Wen Du
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
