Apakah Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dapat Meningkatkan Minat Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA?
(Does Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model can Increase Learning Interest and Biology Learning Outcomes of High School Students)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i3.13369Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of the Reciprocal Teaching (RT) learning model on learning interest and biology learning outcomes of high school students. This research was conducted through a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group design. This study involved students of tenth grade of MA Miftahul Ulum Bettet Pamekasan. Two classes were taken randomly each to be applied RT learning model and conventional learning. Student’s learning interest data were collected through the distribution of questionnaires; while learning outcomes were measured through essay tests. The data obtained were then analyzed using ANACOVA test with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that RT could increase student’s learning interest (p = 0.034) and student’s learning outcomes (p = 0.000). Thus, RT can be used as alternative learning model for teachers to empower students' learning interest and learning outcomes.
Abstrak. Penelitian ini Bertujuan untuk menyelidiki pengaruh model pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching (RT) terhadap minat belajar dan hasil belajar Biologi siswa SMA. Penelitian dilaksanakan melalui desain quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan pretest-posttest control group design. Penelitian melibatkan siswa kelas X MA Miftahul Ulum Bettet Pamekasan. Dua kelas diambil secara acak masing-masing untuk diterapkan model pembelajaran RT dan pembelajaran konvensional. Data minat belajar siswa dikumpulkan melalui penyebaran angket; sementara hasil belajar diukur melalui tes essai. Data yang diperoleh selanjutnya dianalisis menggunakan uji ANACOVA dengan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa RT dapat meningkatkan minat belajar (p = 0,034) dan hasil belajar siswa (p = 0,000). Dengan demikian, RT dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif pembelajaran bagi guru untuk memberdayakan minat sekaligus hasil belajar siswa.
Downloads
References
Abrantes, José LuÃs, Cláudia Seabra, and LuÃs Filipe Lages. (2007). “Pedagogical Affect, Student Interest, and Learning Performance.†Journal of Business Research 60 (9): 960–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026.
Aflalo, Ester. (2021). “Students Generating Questions as a Way of Learning.†Active Learning in Higher Education 22 (1): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418769120.
Ahmad, M. Y., and S. Tambak. (2017). “Hubungan Metode Tanya Jawab Dengan Minat Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.†Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah 2 (1): 89–110.
Apkarian, Naneh, Charles Henderson Id, Marilyne Stains, and Jeffrey Raker Id. (2021). “What Really Impacts the Use of Active Learning in Undergraduate STEM Education ? Results from a National Survey of Chemistry , Mathematics , and Physics Instructors,†1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247544.
Banikowski, A. K., and T. A Mehring. (1999). “Strategies to Enhance Memory Based on Brain-Research.†Focus on Exceptional Children 32 (2): 1–16.
Carter, C. J. (1997). “Why Reciprocal Teaching?†Educational Leadership 54: 64–69.
Corkin, Danya M, Catherine Horn, and Donna Pattison. (2017). “The Effects of an Active Learning Intervention in Biology on College Students ’ Classroom Motivational Climate Perceptions , Motivation , and Achievement.†Educational Psychology 3410 (May): 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1324128.
Derting, Terry L., and Diane Ebert-May. (2010). “Learner-Centered Inquiry in Undergraduate Biology: Positive Relationships with Long-Term Student Achievement.†CBE Life Sciences Education 9 (4): 462–72. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-02-0011.
Efendi, N. (2013). “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dipadukan Think Pair Share Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Metakognitif Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo.†Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan (JSP) 3 (2): 85–109.
Efendi, Nur. (2013). “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dipadukan Think Pair Share Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Metakognitif Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo.†Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan 3 (2): 85–109.
Haerini, R., G. A. Fauzan, and M. Bernard. (2019). “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Smp Di Era Teknologi.†JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif) 2 (5): 229–36.
Hartikainen, Susanna, Heta Rintala, Laura Pylväs, and Petri Nokelainen. (2019). “The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education.†Education Sciences 9 (4): 9–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276.
Herlina, M., and M. Mustika. (2018). “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Menggunakan Mind Mapping Terhadap Minat Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Negeri 6 Rejang Lebong.†Jurnal Kependidikan 2 (2): 12–19.
Hidayah, Laila, S. W. Sudarman, and Ira Vahlia. (2019). “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar.†Aksioma 8 (1): 237–47.
Irwan, I. (2018). “Penerapan Metode Diskusi Dalam Peningkatan Minat Belajar.†IQRO: Journal of Islamic Education 1 (1): 43–54.
Livingston, J a. (1997). “Metacognition: An Overview.†Psychology 13: 259–266. http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.htm.
MacKenzie, A. H., and A. Gardner. (2006). “Beyond the Lab Report: Why We Must Encourage More Writing in Biology.†The American Biology Teacher 68 (6): 325–27.
Mar’atus, Sholihah, Siti Zubaidah, and Susriyati Manahal. (2016). “Memberdayakan Keterampilan Metakognitif Dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Dengan Model Pembelajaran Reading Concept Map-Reciprocal Teaching (REMAP RT).†Jurnal Pendidikan 1 (4): 628–33.
Markant, Douglas B., Azzurra Ruggeri, Todd M. Gureckis, and Fei Xu. (2016). “Enhanced Memory as a Common Effect of Active Learning.†Mind, Brain, and Education 10 (3): 142–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12117.
Mulyono, Dodik, Moch Asmawi, and Tuti Nuriah. (2018). “The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching, Student Facilitator and Explaining and Learning Independence on Mathematical Learning Results by Controlling the Initial Ability of Students.†International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 13 (3): 199–205. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3838.
Nisa, Z., N. Setiati, and S Ridlo. (2016). “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Terhadap Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Materi Protista.†Journal of Biology Education 5 (3): 261–70.
Nurhasanah, Siti, and A. Sobandi. (2016). “Minat Belajar Sebagai Determinan Hasil Belajar Siswa.†Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran 1 (1): 128. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3264.
Nuriana, P. F. D. (2019a). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Terhadap Minat Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Mts Al Maarif Tulungagung Pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar. Tulungagung: Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung.
Okkinga, Mariska, Roel van Steensel, Amos J.S. van Gelderen, and Peter J.C. Sleegers. (2018). “Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on Reading Comprehension of Low-Achieving Adolescents. The Importance of Specific Teacher Skills.†Journal of Research in Reading 41 (1): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12082.
Palincsar, A. S., and L. R. Herrenkohl. (2002). “Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts.†Theory into Practice 41 (1): 26–32.
Palinscar, Aannemarie Sullivan, and Ann L. Brown. (1984). “Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities.†Cognition and Instruction 1 (2): 117–75.
Permendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Pintrich, Paul. (2004). “A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and SRL in College Students.†Educational Psychology Review 16 (4): 385–407. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/44454/10648_2004_Article_NY00000604.pdf;jsessionid=84C5931C2B16127B3BB6CD5DC43C8B0F?sequence=1.
Ramadani, S. D. (2016). “Perbandingan Potensi Strategi Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dan Cooperative Script Dalam Memberdayakan Retensi Siswa.†Wacana Didaktika 4 (2): 171–82.
Ramadani, S. D., A. D. Corebima, and S. Zubaidah. (2013). Perbandingan Potensi Strategi Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching (RT) dan Cooperative Script (CS) dalam Memberdayakan Keterampilan Metakognitif, Hasil Belajar Biologi, Dan Retensi Pada Siswa Berkemampuan Akademik Rendah. SKRIPSI Jurusan Biologi-Fakultas MIPA UM.
Ramadani, S. D, A. Fauzi, I. Sukmawati, and A. D. Corebima. (2015). “Ramadani, S. D., Fauzi, A., Sukmawati, I., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). Perbandingan Potensi Strategi Pembelajaran Cooperative Script Dan Reciprocal Teaching Dalam Memberdayakan Keterampilan Metakognitif, Hasil Belajar Biologi, Dan Retensi Siswa SMA.†In Proceedings of the 2nd Seminar & Workshop Nasional Biologi, IPA, Dan Pembelajarannya FMIPA UM.
Renninger, K. A., S. Hidi, A. Krapp, and A. Renninger. (2014). The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Psychology Press.
Riwahyudin, Arvi. (2015). “Pengaruh Sikap Siswa dan Minat Belajar Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Lamanda.†Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 6 (1): 11–23.
Siregar, E., I. S. Hasibuan, and Y. Atifah. (2017). “Penerapan Model Reciprocal Teaching Dengan Game Smart Case Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Biologi Di SMA Negeri 1 Angkola Timur.†Jurnal PeTeKa 1 (1): 35–36.
Zendler, Andreas, and Swetlana Reile. (2018). “The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching and Programmed Instruction on Learning Outcome in Computer Science Education.†Studies in Educational Evaluation 58 (December 2017): 132–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Shefa Dwijayanti Ramadani, Mas’udhatul Qibtiyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, copyright is retained by the authors and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
