Perjanjian Gadai Sawah Pada Masyarakat Tigo Luhah Kemantan Kabupaten Kerinci

Authors

  • Muhammad Taufiq Universitas Jambi
  • Isran Idris Universitas Jambi
  • Lili Naili Hidayah Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v5i2.29597

Keywords:

Pawn, Rice Field, Tradition

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out and analyze the rice pawn agreement made by the Tigo Luhah Kemantan community of Kerinci Regency according to customary law if it is related to Law Number 56 Prp of 1960 concerning Determination of Agricultural Land Area and to find out about the factors that cause difficulties in redemption in agreement to pawn rice fields in the Tigo Luhah community, Kemantan, Kerinci Regency. The research is empirically juridical in nature, namely to examine the effectiveness of the enforcement of a legal norm. The results of the research show that 1) the implementation of pawning rice fields which is carried out according to customary law shows that there are elements of extortion so that it is not in accordance with what is expected and regulated in the law, because the land can be used by the recipient of the pawn, the risk of changes in the value of the currency is completely borne by the giver. pledge, and the pledge lasts indefinitely; 2) there are several factors behind why customary rice pawn agreements are difficult for the pawnbroker to redeem, namely from an economically disadvantaged perspective, changes in the currency value required during redemption, and the public's lack of knowledge of the laws and regulations related to the law. pawn the rice fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Santoso. Hukum, Moral, Dan Keadilan. Jakarta: Kencana, cetakan kedua, 2014.

Arief Rahman. “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Nomor: 48/Pdt.G/2011/Pn.Pra Tentang Gadai Tanah Pertanian”. Jurnal Private Law Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram,1, 2 (2021)

Deta Tri Rahayu. “Identifikasi Tingkat Kesejahteraan Keluarga Petani Padi Di Desa Sungai Tutung Kecamatan Air Hangat Timur Kabupaten Kerinci”. Skripsi, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, 2021.

Iyah Faniyah Dan Della Monita. “Pelaksanaan Dan Berakhirnya Gadai Tanah Harta Pusako Tinggi Masyarakat Adat Minangkabau”. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 1, 1 (2022)

Jonwari dan Faiz Zainuddin. “Sistem Gadai Tanah Sawah Perspektif Hukum Positif UU No, 56/PRP/Tahun 1960 Di Desa Banyuputih Kecamatan Banyuputih Kabupaten Situbondo”. Jurnal Al-Hukmi, 1, 2 (2020)

Kabupaten Bantul,. “Saat Ini Investasi Emas Cukup Menjanjikan”. https://bantulkab.go.id/berita/detail/2702/saat-ini-investasi-emas-cukup menjanjikan-.html, 08/12/2016. Diakses 19/8/2023.

Nur Ridwan Ari Sasongko. “Gadai Tanah/Sawah Menurut Hukum Adat Dari Masa Ke Masa”. Jurnal Repertorium, 1, 2 (2014)

Rosnidar Sembiring. Hukum Pertanahan Adat. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, cetakan kedua, 2019.

Soerojo Wignjodipoero. Pengantar Dan Asas-Asas Hukum Adat. Jakarta: PT. Gunung Agung, cetakan kedelapan, 1985.

Yultiar Rahmat Yunus, Nirwan Junus, Julius T. Mandjo. “Implementasi Hukum Tentang Perjanjian Gadai Tanah Pertanian Di Desa Pilohayanga Kecematan Telaga Kabupaten Gorontalo”. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora Dan Seni (JISHS), 1, 2 (2023)

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 56 Tahun 1960 tentang Penetapan Luas Tanah Pertanian

Republik Indonesia, Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI tanggal 11 Mei 1955 No. 26K/SIP/1955

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

Taufiq, M., Idris, I., & Naili Hidayah, L. (2024). Perjanjian Gadai Sawah Pada Masyarakat Tigo Luhah Kemantan Kabupaten Kerinci. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 5(2), 207 -. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v5i2.29597

Issue

Section

Articles