Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Komunitas dan Potensi Perlindungan Hutan Tidak Langsung: Studi Kasus Pada Rentang Waktu Tertentu dari Bank Sampah Urban Dewan, Indonesia: Community Based Waste Management and Potential Indirect Forest Protection: A Time Series Case Study from Bank Sampah Urban Dewan, Indonesia

Wirawan Hadi; Muliyadi Saputra

doi:10.22437/jurnalsilvatropika.v10i1.52522

Authors

Wirawan Hadi Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Muliyadi Saputra Faculty of Engineering, Sapta Mandiri University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jurnalsilvatropika.v10i1.52522

Keywords:

community-based waste management, forest resource protection, sustainable development goals, waste bank

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Community based waste management is increasingly recognized as a key component of circular economy transitions in developing countries. Its potential contribution to forest protection remains underexplored. This study aims to assess how the operational performance of a community-based waste bank reflects circular economy dynamics and its potential relevance for forest resource conservation study examines the role of waste banks as indirect instruments for forest resource conservation. The analysis is conducted at Bank Sampah Urban Dewan, a community waste bank in Indonesia,nal data from a community based waste bank system over the period 2021 – 2025. A time series approach is applied to examine trends in recovered waste, material composition, and participation adjusted recovery intensity (kg per customer per year). Results indicate that paper consistently represents the dominant recovered material, followed by plastic and cooking oil used. While total recovered waste increases over time, waste management intensity varies substantially, reflecting dynamic participation patterns. The dominance of paper recovery suggests a material substitution pathway, whereby increased availability of secondary fibers may reduce reliance on virgin forest-based resources. In this study, recovery intensity is employed as an operational proxy for circular economy performance and potential indirect forest pressure reduction. The findings highlight that waste bank can generate cross sector co-benefits beyond urban waste reduction, contributing to sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13), and life on land (SDG 15). Although causal impacts on deforestation are not quantified, the study provides empirical evidence supporting the integration of community-based waste management into broader forest and sustainability policies. This research advances the waste forestry nexus literature and offers a replicable analytical framework for assessing the indirect environmental benefits of circular economy interventions.

Keywords: community-based waste management, forest resource protection, sustainable development goals, waste bank

ABSTRAK

Pengelolaan sampah berbasis komunitas semakin diakui sebagai komponen penting dalam transisi menuju ekonomi sirkular di negara-negara berkembang. Potensi kontribusinya terhadap perlindungan hutan masih belum banyak dieksplorasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai bagaimana kinerja operasional sebuah bank sampah berbasis komunitas mencerminkan dinamika ekonomi sirkular serta relevansinya bagi konservasi sumber daya hutan, sekaligus mengkaji peran bank sampah sebagai instrumen tidak langsung dalam perlindungan sumber daya hutan. Analisis dilakukan di Bank Sampah Urban Dewan, sebuah bank sampah komunitas di Indonesia, menggunakan data operasional sistem pengelolaan sampah berbasis masyarakat selama periode 2021–2025. Pendekatan deret waktu (time series) diterapkan untuk mengkaji tren volume sampah yang dikelola, komposisi material, serta intensitas pengelolaan yang disesuaikan dengan tingkat partisipasi (kg per nasabah per tahun). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kertas secara konsisten merupakan material yang paling dominan dipulihkan, diikuti oleh plastik dan minyak jelantah. Meskipun total sampah yang dikelola meningkat dari waktu ke waktu, intensitas pengelolaan sampah berfluktuasi secara signifikan, mencerminkan dinamika pola partisipasi masyarakat. Dominasi pemulihan kertas mengindikasikan adanya jalur substitusi material, di mana peningkatan ketersediaan serat sekunder berpotensi mengurangi ketergantungan pada sumber daya berbasis hutan yang bersifat primer. Dalam penelitian ini, intensitas pemulihan digunakan sebagai proksi operasional untuk kinerja ekonomi sirkular dan potensi pengurangan tekanan terhadap hutan secara tidak langsung. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa bank sampah dapat menghasilkan manfaat lintas sektor yang melampaui pengurangan sampah perkotaan semata, dengan berkontribusi pada tujuan konsumsi dan produksi berkelanjutan (SDG 12), aksi iklim (SDG 13), serta perlindungan ekosistem daratan (SDG 15). Meskipun dampak kausal terhadap deforestasi belum dapat dikuantifikasi secara langsung, penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris yang mendukung integrasi pengelolaan sampah berbasis komunitas ke dalam kebijakan kehutanan dan keberlanjutan yang lebih luas. Penelitian ini memperkaya literatur mengenai keterkaitan antara pengelolaan sampah dan kehutanan serta menawarkan kerangka analitis yang dapat direplikasi untuk menilai manfaat lingkungan tidak langsung dari intervensi ekonomi sirkular.

Kata kunci: bank sampah, pengelolaan sampah berbasis komunitas, perlindungan sumber daya hutan, tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan

References

Atmadja S, Verchot LV. 2012. A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in addressing leakage from reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17: 311–336.

Babu MSS, Raghuveer S. 2005. Molding of recovered paper into world class paperboards. IPPTA: Quarterly Journal of Indian Pulp and Paper Technical Association 17(3): 79–81.

Balboni C, Berman A, Burgess R, Olken BA. 2023. The economics of tropical deforestation. Annual Review of Economics 15: 723–754.

Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Bishop J, Aylward B. 1994. The economics of the tropical timber trade (1st ed.) Routledge.

Burggräf P, Steinberg F, Sauer CR, Nettesheim P, Wigger M, Becher A, Greiff K, Raulf K, Spies A, Köhler H, Huesmann R, Atapin A, Kaufeld S, Krolle A, Faul A, Winter J, Küppers B, Ludes A. 2023. Boosting the circular manufacturing of the sustainable paper industry: A first approach to recycle paper from unexploited sources such as lightweight packaging, residual and commercial waste. Procedia CIRP 120: 505–510.

Ehman N, Vallejos ME, Area MC. 2025. Paper engineering: General considerations. In The handbook of paper-based sensors and devices: Volume 1: Materials and technologies (pp. 99–125). Springer Science+Business Media.

Ewers RM, Rodrigues ASL. 2008. Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23(3): 113–116.

Fatimah YA, Govindan K, Murniningsih R, Setiawan A. 2020. Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production 269: 122263.

Fernández-Braña Á, Sousa V, Dias-Ferreira C. 2019. Are municipal waste utilities becoming sustainable? A framework to assess and communicate progress. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(35): 35305–35316.

Garrett RD, Koh I, Lambin EF, le Polain de Waroux Y, Kastens JH, Brown JC. 2018. Intensification in agriculture–forest frontiers: Land use responses to development and conservation policies in Brazil. Global Environmental Change 53: 233–243.

Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W. 2013. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management 33(1): 220–232.

Gusheva E, Gjorgievski V, Obradovic Grncarovska T, Markovska N. 2022. How do waste climate policies contribute to sustainable development? A case study of North Macedonia. Journal of Cleaner Production 354: 131572.

Huais PY, Kuemmerle T, Nori J, Tomba AN, Cordier JM, Baumann M. 2025. Only one-third of protected areas in the Chaco effectively curb woodland loss, but their impact extends beyond their boundaries. Biological Conservation 308: 111196.

Jiang Q, Cheng Y, Jin Q, Deng X, Qi Y. 2015. Simulation of forestland dynamics in a typical deforestation and afforestation area under climate scenarios. Energies 8(10): 10558–10583.

Kit SG, Wan Alwi SR, Manan ZA. 2011. A new graphical approach for simultaneous targeting and design of a paper recycling network. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering 6(5): 778–786.

Kurniawan TA, de Oliveira JAP. 2014. Technology adaptation and assimilation of Takakura for promoting environmental protection in Surabaya (Indonesia) through city level cooperation. In Greening of Industry Networks Studies (Vol. 3, pp. 177–191): Springer.

Kurniawan TA, Avtar R, Singh D, Xue W, Dzarfan Othman MH, Hwang GH, Iswanto Albadarin AB, Kern AO. 2021. Reforming MSWM in Sukunan (Yogjakarta, Indonesia): A case-study of applying a zero-waste approach based on circular economy paradigm. Journal of Cleaner Production 284: 124775.

Lamers P, Mai-Moulin T, Junginger M. 2016. Challenges and opportunities for international trade in forest biomass. In Mobilization of forest bioenergy in the boreal and temperate biomes: Challenges, opportunities and case studies (pp. 127–164).

Lauri P, Forsell N, Di Fulvio F, Snäll T, Havlík P. 2021. Material substitution between coniferous, non-coniferous and recycled biomass: Impacts on forest industry raw material use and regional competitiveness. Forest Policy and Economics 132: 102588.

Lohar K, Pahwa P, Asthana N, Gautam D. 2024. Stock market analysis using time series with ARIMA model. In 2024 2nd International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control (IC4 2024): IEEE.

Lorang E, Lobianco A, Delacote P. 2023. Increasing paper and cardboard recycling: Impacts on the forest sector and carbon emissions. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 28(2): 189–200.

Malakahmad A, Abualqumboz MS, Kutty SRM, Abunama TJ. 2017. Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques: Case study of Malaysia. Waste Management 70: 282–292.

Mayasari D, Purwanto BH, Firdausijah RT. 2025. Proposal for the largest waste management in landfills in Indonesia for environmental sustainability and public health. Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences 7(3): 34–46.

Merrild H, Damgaard A, Christensen TH. 2008. Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52(12): 1391–1398.

Muktiningsih SD, Sekito T, Rahmaudina S, Dote Y, Prayogo TB. 2023. Material flow and waste recovery in a community-based waste management system in Batu, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1165(1): 012005.

Osis R, Laurent F, Poccard-Chapuis R. 2019. Spatial determinants and future land use scenarios of Paragominas municipality, an old agricultural frontier in Amazonia. Journal of Land Use Science 14(3): 258–279.

Rahmi AF, Lanin D, Mulya NP. 2025. The impact of employee performance and community participation on solid waste management effectiveness in Bukittinggi City, Indonesia. BIO Web of Conferences 155: 06010.

Remić K, Jošt M. 2023. Assessing the impact of forest management in life cycle assessment: Wooden table case study. In M. Klarić, R. B. Lučić, J. Jovanović, N. Španić, & K. Klarić (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Wood Science and Technology: Unleashing the Potential of Wood-Based Materials (ICWST 2023) (pp. 163–170). Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb.

Schulte M, Jonsson R, Hammar T, Eggers J, Stendahl J, Hansson PA. 2024. Climate change mitigation from increased paper recycling in Sweden: Conserving forests or using substitution? Environmental Research Communications 6(7): 075002.

Sembiring E, Nitivattananon V. 2010. Sustainable solid waste management toward an inclusive society: Integration of the informal sector. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(11): 802–809.

Silva DS, Nunes S. 2025. Leakage effects from reforestation: Estimating the impact of agricultural displacement for carbon markets. Land 14(5): 963.

Smith M. 2006. Responsible printing, sustainable forests. In-Plant Graphics, 56(3), 38–42.

Tascione V, Raggi A. 2012. Identification and selection of alternative scenarios in LCA studies of integrated waste management systems: A review of main issues and perspectives. Sustainability 4(10): 2430–2442.

Tascione V, Mosca R, Raggi A. 2014. LCA and linear programming for the environmental optimization of waste management systems: A simulation. In A. Raggi, R. Mosca, & M. J. W. P. L. Raggi (Eds.), Pathways to environmental sustainability: Methodologies and experiences (pp. 13–22). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03826-1_2

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (nd). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations.

Yang Y, Zhang J, Feng W. 2010. A prediction on electronic waste resources with time series model. In ICCASM 2010—2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling, Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 551–555). IEEE Computer Society.