FROM ACTIVITY-BASED WORKPLACES TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: DIGITALIZATION AS THE MEDIATING MECHANISM

Authors

  • Verdy Prahutri Hermansyah Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta image/svg+xml
  • Rita Yuni Mulyanti Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Suhana Suhana Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v10i4.57236

Keywords:

Activity-Based Workplace, Indirect-Only Mediation, Public Employee Performance, Public Sector, Workplace Digitalization

Abstract

Activity-based workplaces (ABW) are increasingly used to support flexible work, yet their contribution to employee performance remains inconsistent, particularly in public organizations where work must remain standardized, traceable, and accountable. This study examines whether workplace digitalization explains the translation of ABW into public employee performance. Method: A quantitative explanatory-causal design was used with cross-sectional survey data from 63 functional public procurement officers selected through purposive sampling from a target population of 66 officers. Responses were measured on a six-point Likert scale and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4. Results: ABW has a strong positive effect on digitalization (β = 0.763; p < 0.001), and digitalization positively affects employee performance (β = 0.411; p = 0.014). The direct ABW → employee performance effect is negative and not significant (β = -0.408; p = 0.130), whereas the indirect ABW → digitalization → performance effect is positive and significant (β = 0.313; p = 0.012), indicating indirect-only mediation. Discussion/Novelty and Implication: The study shows that ABW does not generate performance value solely through spatial flexibility; its contribution emerges when flexible space is converted into digitally enabled access, coordination, and execution of work. Public organizations should therefore treat ABW and digitalization as an integrated work-system intervention by strengthening reliable digital infrastructure, standardized digital workflows, leadership support, and employee digital capability.

Author Biographies

  • Verdy Prahutri Hermansyah, Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

  • Suhana Suhana, Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

    Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

References

Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Janssen, I., & Groenen, P. (2011). An end-user's perspective on activity-based office concepts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111136830.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2024). Job Demands-Resources Theory: Frequently Asked Questions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 29(3), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000376.

Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3.

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687–732). Consulting Psychologists Press.

De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.

Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed., global ed.). Pearson.

Schallmo, D., Williams, C. A., & Tidd, J. (2022). The art of holistic digitalisation: A meta-view on strategy, transformation, implementation, and maturity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 2240007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622400072.

Sulistianingtiyas, I., & Djastuti, I. (2022). The effect of digitalization in the workplace on employee performance mediated by employee attachment (study on employees of the Center for Product Processing Research and Marine and Fisheries Biotechnology, Central Jakarta). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5387.

Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101.

Veldhoen, E. (2005). The demise of the office. BIS Publishers.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.

Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.

Wohlers, C., & Hertel, G. (2017). Choosing where to work at work: Toward a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices. Ergonomics, 60(4), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1191004.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

FROM ACTIVITY-BASED WORKPLACES TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: DIGITALIZATION AS THE MEDIATING MECHANISM. (2026). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 10(4), 2025-2031. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v10i4.57236

Most read articles by the same author(s)