A study on tax compliance in tax amnesty policy

Authors

  • Bambang Juanda Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Lukytawati Anggraeni Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Putri Mahestyanti Economic Growth Support Activity (EGSA), USAID, Indonesia
  • Benny Robby Kurniawan Bank Central Asia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v10i3.19572

Keywords:

Experimental approach, Tax amnesty, Tax Compliance

Abstract

The Indonesian Government implemented the tax amnesty policy in 2016 with several objectives, among others, to achieve tax revenue targets in the short-term, while in the long term it is to improve tax compliance, especially for the wealthier Indonesian citizens, while also accelerating tax reforms to increase tax participation’s rate. This paper examines the effects of factors (wealth, tariff period system, tax fines, audit probability, and taxpayers’ expectation of future tax amnesty) on tax compliance. Tax compliance is measured by the percentage of assets unit, the percentage of assets value reported by taxpayers, and the taxpayer participation rate in tax amnesty policy. This behavioral economics study uses an experimental approach because it is impossible to use conventional methods. The result showed that the taxpayers with higher wealth have lower compliance and prefer to participate in tax amnesty programs at the lowest tariff rate. The government's effort to impose fines and audits shows a greater effect on tax compliance. The tax amnesty policy should only be implemented once because if people expect a similar policy to be applied in the future, they will wait for the policy so that tax compliance is low. A tax amnesty policy­—while it can increase tax revenues in the short term—could reduce tax compliance, especially if the government imposes a second tax amnesty in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alm, J., McKee, M., & Beck, W. (1990). Amazing Grace: Tax Amnesties and Compliance. National Tax Journal, 43(1), 23–37.

Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Wallace, S. (2009). Do Tax Amnesties Work? The Revenue Effects of Tax Amnesties during the Transition in the Russian Federation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39(2), 235–253.

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–860.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2016). Reflection on the Level of Taxpayer Compliance. Retrieved from http://www.pajak.go.id

Friedman, D., & Sunder, S. (1994). Experimental Methods: A Premier for Economist. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Ibrahim, M. A., Myrna, R., Irawati, I., & Kristiadi, J. B. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review on Tax Amnesty in 9 Asian Countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 220–225.

Indonesia, R. (2016). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty.

Juanda, B. (2009). Research Method for Economics and Business. (2nd Ed). Bogor: IPB Press.

Juanda, B., Ridiawati, I., & Maryati. (2010). Tax Compliance Review in Self-Assessment System with Experimental Method. Working Paper. Departement of Economics, IPB.

Juanda, B. (2021). Experimental Economics. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Kurniawan, B., B. Juanda, & T. Bakhtiar. (2019). A Study of Tax Amnesty Policy Using Experimental Approachâ€. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia (JEPI), 9(1), 21-48.

Leonard, H. B., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (1987). Amnesty, Enforcement, and Tax Policyâ€. Tax Policy and the Economy, 1, 55–85.

Lerman, A. H. (1986). Tax Amnesty: The Federal Perspective. National Tax Journal, 39(3), 325–332.

Mahestyanti, P., B. Juanda, & L. Anggraeni. (2018). The Determinants of Tax Compliance in Tax Amnesty Programs: Experimental Approach. Etikonomi, 17(1), 93-110.

Nar, M. (2015). The Effects of Behavioral Economics on Tax Amnesty. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 580–589.

Ragimun. (2014). Analysis of Tax Amnesty Implementation in Indonesia. Jurnal Kemenkeu RI. Retrieved from: https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/sites/default/files/analisis-implementasi-tax-amnesty-di-indonesia.pdf.

Rechberger, S., Hartner, M., Kirchler, E., & Hammerle, F. (2010). Tax Amnesties, Justice Perceptions and Filing Behavior: A Simulation Study. Law and Policy, 32(2), 214- 225.

Ritsema, C. M., Thomas, D. W., & Ferrier, G. D. (2003). Economic and Behavioral Determinants of Tax Compliance: Evidence from the 1997 Arkansas Tax Penalty Amnesty Program. Paper Presented at the 2003 IRS Research Conference June 2003 Washington. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/ritsema.pdf.

Saracoglu, O. F., & Caskurlu, E. (2011). Tax Amnesty with Effects and Effecting Aspects: Tax Compliance, Tax Audits and Enforcements Around; The Turkish Case. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 95–103.

Smith, V. L. (1976). Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 274–279

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Juanda, B., Anggraeni, L., Mahestyanti, P., & Kurniawan, B. R. (2022). A study on tax compliance in tax amnesty policy. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 10(3), 131 - 146. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v10i3.19572