Integrated rural socio-economic vulnerability analysis in Lampung Province

Authors

  • Dedy Yuliawan Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Lampung, Indonesia
  • Dedi Budiman Hakim Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Bambang Juanda Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Fauzi Department of Resource and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v10i3.17591

Keywords:

Entropy, Rural development, TOPSIS, Vulnerability

Abstract

One of the common characteristics of rural areas is their vulnerability to socio-economic and environmental shocks. Therefore, rural development policies should consider these features to take full advantage of the benefits of rural development. This study aims to develop a pastoral assessment based on the TOPSIS-Etropy-Inhomogeneity Method. This research was conducted in Lampung Province using data at the regency level. The data uses village data from the 2018 Village Potential Survey (PODES). The results show that rural areas' exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity factors play an essential role in rural development regarding vulnerability and resilience. Pesisir Barat, Mesuji, and Tulang Bawang Regencies are highly susceptible to low adaptation factors such as difficult access to health centers, inadequate credit facilities from the government, quiet village anticipation and mitigation, and a lack of security systems. The lowest vulnerabilities are in Tanggamus and North Lampung Regencies with common sensitivity factors, where people with malnutrition, persons with disabilities, households living in slums, and the habit of not using river water or the like for drinking or cooking have lower scores. In addition, other factors contribute to vulnerability, and these factors should be considered in rural development policies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abubakar, I. R. (2021). Understanding the socioeconomic and environmental indicators of household water treatment in Nigeria. Utilities Policy, 70, 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101209

Ahmadi, S., Movahed, R. G., Gholamrezaie, S., & Rahimian, M. (2022). Assessing the Vulnerability of Rural Households to Floods at Pol-e Dokhtar Region in Iran. Sustainability, 14(2), 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020762

Anderson, M. B. (1993). Disaster Vulnerability and Sustainable Development: A General Framework for Assessing Vulnerability. The Collaborative for Development Action, Inc. Cambridge, MA.

Bollin, C., Cardenas, C., Herwig, H., & Vatsa, K. S. (2003). Disaster Risk Management by Communities anda Local Governments. In Inter-American Development Bank for the Regional Policy Dialogue. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25402240

BPS. (2022). Provinsi Lampung dalam Angka 2022. Bandar Lampung: BPS

Brochu, P. J., Yanosky, J. D., Paciorek, C. J., Schwartz, J., Chen, J. T., Herrick, R. F., & Suh, H. H. (2011). Particulate air pollution and socioeconomic position in rural and urban areas of the Northeastern United States. American Journal of Public Health, 101(SUPPL. 1), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300232

Chakravarthi, K. K., Shyamala, L., & Vaidehi, V. (2020). TOPSIS inspired cost-efficient concurrent workflow scheduling algorithm in cloud. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.02.006

Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial Introduction: Vulnerability, Coping and Policy. IDS Bulletin, 20(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1989.mp20002001.x

De Silva, M. M. G. T., & Kawasaki, A. (2018). Socioeconomic Vulnerability to Disaster Risk: A Case Study of Flood and Drought Impact in a Rural Sri Lankan Community. Ecological Economics, 152, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.010

Fang, Y. ping, Zhu, F. biao, Qiu, X. ping, & Zhao, S. (2018). Effects of natural disasters on livelihood resilience of rural residents in Sichuan. Habitat International, 76, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004

FAO, & UN Evironment Programme. (2021). Global assessment of soil pollution: Report. In Global assessment of soil pollution: Report. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4894en

Fauzi, A. (2022). Analsis Risiko dan Keberlanjutan Lingkungan. Tanggerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.

Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005627828199

Kim, B. J., Jeong, S., & Chung, J. B. (2021). Research trends in vulnerability studies from 2000 to 2019: Findings from a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102141

Kober, G. (2018). A Dynamic and Relational Perspective on Vulnerability and Fear of Crime. Albert Ludwig University.

Krauss, J. E., Artur, L., Brockington, D., Castro, E., Fernando, J., Fisher, J., Kingman, A., Moises, H. M., Mlambo, A., Nuvunga, M., Pritchard, R., Ribeiro, N., Ryan, C. M., Tembe, J., & Zimudzi, C. (2022). ‘To prevent this disease, we have to stay at home, but if we stay at home, we die of hunger’ – Livelihoods, vulnerability and coping with Covid-19 in rural Mozambique. World Development, 151, 105757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105757

Lazarte, A. (2017). in Rural Economies. International Labour Office (ILO), 214.

Maganga, A. M., Chiwaula, L., & Kambewa, P. (2021). Climate induced vulnerability to poverty among smallholder farmers: Evidence from Malawi. World Development Perspectives, 21, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100273

Mekonen, A. A., & Berlie, A. B. (2021). Rural households’ livelihood vulnerability to climate variability and extremes: a livelihood zone-based approach in the Northeastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Ecological Processes, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00313-5

Memon, M. H., Ali, M., & Khalil, S. (2020). Determinants of income diversification in flood-prone rural Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50(October), 101914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101914

Nguyen, Y. T. B., & Leisz, S. J. (2021). Determinants of livelihood vulnerability to climate change: Two minority ethnic communities in the northwest mountainous region of Vietnam. Environmental Science and Policy, 123, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.007

Pantazis, C. (2000). ’ Fear Of Crime ’, Vulnerability And Poverty : Evidence from the British Crime Survey. The British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 414–436. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23638940

Peter, W. G. (1971). Cannikin: A Compelling Necessity? BioScience, 21(18), 955–958. https://doi.org/10.2307/1296118

Qazlbash, S. K., Zubair, M., Manzoor, S. A., Haq, A. ul, & Baloch, M. S. (2021). Socioeconomic determinants of climate change adaptations in the flood-prone rural community of Indus Basin, Pakistan. Environmental Development, 37, 100603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100603

Seddon, D., & Hussein, K. (2002). Working Paper 185 The Consequences of Conflict : Livelihoods and Development in Nepal. Working Papers 185 Overseas Development Institute, Desember.

Shen, J., Duan, W., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Household Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Change in West China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010551

Shepherd, A. (1998). Sustainable rural development. MacMillan Publishers

Stanturf, J. A., Goodrick, S. L., Warren, M. L., Charnley, S., & Stegall, C. M. (2015). Social vulnerability and Ebola virus disease in rural Liberia. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137208

UNDP. (1994). Disasters and Development. UNDP.

Vázquez-González, C., Ãvila-Foucat, V. S., Ortiz-Lozano, L., Moreno-Casasola, P., & Granados-Barba, A. (2021). Analytical framework for assessing the social-ecological system trajectory considering the resilience-vulnerability dynamic interaction in the context of disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102232

Weis, S. W. M., Agostini, V. N., Roth, L. M., Gilmer, B., Schill, S. R., Knowles, J. E., & Blyther, R. (2016). Assessing vulnerability: an integrated approach for mapping adaptive capacity, sensitivity, and exposure. Climatic Change, 136(3–4), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1642-0

Wicaksono, A., & Jayanto, G. D. (2021). Pemetaan Potensi Kerentanan Pencemaran Air Permukaan Untuk Pengendalian Sanitasi Lingkungan di Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, 5(1), 1–20. http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JPPDAS/article/view/6138

Yang, W., Xu, K., Lian, J., Ma, C., & Bin, L. (2018). Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods. Ecological Indicators, 89, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.015

Yang, X., Guo, S., Deng, X., Wang, W., & Xu, D. (2021). Study on livelihood vulnerability and adaptation strategies of farmers in areas threatened by different disaster types under climate change. Agriculture, 11(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111088

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Yuliawan, D., Hakim, D. B., Juanda, B. ., & Fauzi, A. (2022). Integrated rural socio-economic vulnerability analysis in Lampung Province. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 10(3), 175 - 188. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v10i3.17591

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Dedy Yuliawan, Dedi Budiman Hakim, Bambang Juanda, Akhmad Fauzi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.