Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Students of Sanata Dharma University Through LAVA LAMP Experiments

Authors

  • Wintan Pareza Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Wizziah Pratiwi Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jtpd.v2i2.29019

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Lava Lamp Experiment

Abstract

This study aims to describe the analysis of the implementation of learning critical thinking skills for Sanata Dharma University students through the LAVA LAMP experiment. This study uses a qualitative approach with the type of experimental research. Data from this study were obtained through participatory observation, through interviews with supervisors, and through student work, as well as documentation to support student work. The results showed that the researchers efforts were in using the LAVA LAMP experiment to improve the critical thinking skills of university students Sanata Dharma: The research results show that the researchers' efforts in using the LAVA LAMP experiment to improve the critical thinking skills of Sanata Dharma University students: focusing questions 10 % with category good, ask and answer questions that require explanation 20 % with category very good, observe and consider the results of observations 20 % very good, carry out deductions and assess the results of the deduction 10 % with category good, doing induction 10 % with category good, define terms and consider definitions using appropriate criteria 10 % with category good, identify assumptions 10 % with category very good, and integrate with others 10 % with category good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arif S. Sadiman, dkk. 1986. Media Pendidikan, pengertian, Pengembangan, dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Cottrell. (2005). Critical Thinking Skill. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Daniati, N., Handayani, D., Yogica, R., & Alberida, H. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Padang tentang Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 1(2), 1–10.

Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003.tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.

DePorter, Bobbi. dkk. 2013. QUANTUM LEARNING: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.

Filsaime, Dennis K. (2008). Terjemahan oleh: Sunarni. Menguak Rahasia Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Raya.

Hidayat, A., Rahayu, S., & Rahmawati, I. (2018). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Gaya dan Penerapannya. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM.

Jensen, Eric. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: PT Indeks Permata Puri Media.

Johnson, Elaine B. 2009. Contextual teaching and learning: menjadikan kegiatan belajar mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Palendeng. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugara, U., Studi, P., Pendidikan, M., Universitas, D., & Yogyakarta, N. (2022). Etnopedagogi : Gagasan dan Peluang Penerapannya di Indonesia Ethnopedagogy : Ideas and Probability of Its Implementation in Indonesia, 7, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i2.2888

Wijaya, Cece. 2010. Pendidikan Remidial. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-17

How to Cite

Pareza, W. ., & Pratiwi, W. . (2023). Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Students of Sanata Dharma University Through LAVA LAMP Experiments. Jurnal Tonggak Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Teori Dan Hasil Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.22437/jtpd.v2i2.29019

Issue

Section

Articles