The Effect of Fraud Triangle Theory in Detecting Financial Fraud (Case Study of Food and Beverage Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2022)

Authors

  • Helpan Alfaridzi Program Studi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi, Jambi - Indonesia
  • Enggar Diah PA Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi, Jambi - Indonesia
  • Rico Wijaya Z Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi, Jambi - Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jaku.v9i4.42059

Keywords:

Greed, Opportunity, Need, Exposure, Fraud, Financial Fraud

Abstract

This research aims to test and analyze the detection of financial fraud using a model developed based on fraud triangle theory in food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2022. This type of research is quantitative research with the documentation method. The research population includes 95 companies. The sample selection technique was carried out using purposive sampling method which resulted in 52 companies with a total of 208 samples that met the criteria. The data used is secondary data from the company's annual report and the data collection method is documentation. Data analysis uses the Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) approach through SmartPLS 4.0 software. The results revealed that the opportunity and rationalization variables have a significant influence on detecting financial fraud. Meanwhile, the pressure variable does not show a significant effect in detecting financial fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACFE. (2024). Fraud 101: What Is Fraud? In Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

ACFE Indonesia. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. ACFE Indonesia Chapter.

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1).

Ahmadiana, N. S. S., & Novita, N. (2018). Prediksi Financial Statement Fraud melalui Fraud Triangle Theory. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 77(84), 12–14.

Alaudin, S. F., & Ahalik. (2023). Pengaruh Unsur Segitiga Kecurangan Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Listed BUMN . Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Komputerisasi Akuntansi , 14(1), 1–16.

Alhasani, A. A. A., & Sweiti, I. (2023). The Role of Corporate Governance in Reducing the Adverse Impacts on the Reliability of Financial Statements Evidence from Saudi Listed Firms. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: D Accounting and Auditing, 23(1).

Amsaroka, M. H. (2023). Comparison Of Factors Affecting The Level Of Fraud In LQ-45 Index Corporate Financial Reports. JURNAL MANEKSI, 12(1).

Anggraeni, S. D. (2023). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016 – 2020. Soetomo Accounting Review, 1(4), 590–604.

Barman, S., Pal, U., Sarfaraj, Md. A., Biswas, B., Mahata, A., & Mandal, P. (2016). A complete literature review on financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques. N International Journal of Trust Management in Computing and Communications.

Beneish, M. D. (2003). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. Association for Investment Management and Research.

Beneish, M. D., Lee, C. M. C., & Nichols, D. C. (2013). Earnings Manipulation and Expected Returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(2).

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Metode Riset Bisnis (Sembilan, Vol. 2). PT Media Global Edukasi.

Du, M. (2021). Corporate governance: five-factor theory-based financial fraud identification. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(1), 1–19.

Fahmi, I. (2020). Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Soal Jawab (M. A. Djalil, Ed.; Keenam). Penerbit Alfabeta.

Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud Pentagon Dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1–22.

Ghozali, I., & Kusumadewi, K. A. (2023). Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 4.0 Untuk Penelitian Empiris (1st ed.). Penerbit Yoga Pratama.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.

Hamid, R. S., & Anwar, S. M. (2019). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Berbasis Varian Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi Program SMart PLS 3.2.8 dalam Riset Bisnis (Abiratno, S. Nurdiyanti, & A. D. Raksanagara, Eds.; 1st ed.). PT Inkubator Penulis Indonesia.

Handayani, R., Sutarjo, A., & Yani, M. (2021). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity Dan Rationalization (Fraud Triangle) Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2013-2017). Pareso Jurnal, 3(3), 683–694.

Hartanto, R., Lasmanah, Mustafa, M. R., & Purnamasari, P. (2019). Analysis of Factors That Influence Financial Statement Fraud In The Perspective Fraud Triangle: Empirical Study on Banking Companies In Indonesia . Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference On Advance And Scientific Innovation.

Hormati, G. A., & Pesudo, D. A. A. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, Rasionalisasi Dan Kemampuan Terhadap Kecenderungan Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Melakukan Kecurangan Akuntansi Studi Empiris Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 9(2), 172–190.

Hugo, J. (2019). Efektivitas Model Beneish M-Score Dan Model F-Score dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3(1), 165–175.

Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia. (2015). Exposure Draft Penyajian Laporan Keuangan Prakarsa Pengungkapan. Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kaituko, L. E., Githaiga, P. N., & Chelogoi, S. K. (2023). Board structure and the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Does audit fee matter? Evidence from manufacturing firms in the East Africa community. Cogent Business & Management.

Kurniawati, N., & Sarwono, A. E. (2024). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi Terhadap Kecurangan (Fraud) Laporan Keuangan . Wacana Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi , 23(1), 36–43.

Lestari, D. N., & Kurniawan, G. I. (2021). Deteksi Risiko Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Analis Fraud Triangle Pada Perusahaan PT. Garuda Indonesia Dan Toshiba. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(2).

Mensah, N. A., Salia, H., & Addo, E. B. (2023). Using the Beneish M-score Model to Detect Financial Statement Fraud in the Microfinance Industry in Ghana. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 13(4), 47–57.

Nurbaiti, A., & Cipta, A. T. (2022). Fraud Hexagon untuk Mendeteksi Indikasi Financial Statement Fraud. E-JURNAL AKUNTANSI, 32(10), 2977–2990.

PWC. (2022). PwC’s Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2022 Protecting the perimeter: The rise of external fraud.

Reskino, & Anshori, M. F. (2016). Model Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma JAMAL, 7(2), 156–323.

Sandria, F. (2021, July 27). Deretan Skandal Lapkeu di Pasar Saham RI, Indofarma-Hanson! CNBC Indonesia.

Santi, Noviarty, H., & Ikhsan, S. (2024). Pentingkah Teori Kecurangan Hexagon dalam Mencegah Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan? Monex – Journal of Accounting Research, 13(02).

Setiawan, J., Feliyanti, C., Tristyan, S., Putri, A., & Meiden, C. (2021). Analisis Metode Pendeteksian Fraud Financial Statement: Literatur Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Akuntansi, 16(2), 153–174.

Shodikin, A., & Utomo, R. B. (2024). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization Terhadap Accounting Fraud (Perusahaan BUMN yang Terdaftar di BEI 2020-2022). Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 8(2), 407–424.

Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2020). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinear dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis (C. Mitak, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Penerbit ANDI.

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 13, 53–81.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Ke-26). Alfabeta.

Suwena, K. R. (2021). Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi Pemicu Tindakan Kecurangan (Fraud) pada Perusahaan. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 6(1), 102–114.

Wahyuni, & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2017). Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(1), 47–61.

Wareza, M. (2019, March 29). Tiga Pilar dan Drama Penggelembungan Dana. CNBC Indonesia.

Xu, X., Xiong, F., & An, Z. (2022). Using Machine Learning to Predict Corporate Fraud: Evidence Based on the GONE Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 186, 137–158.

Yuwono, Y. P., & Marlina, M. A. E. (2021). Peran Fraud Triangle dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud di Perusahaan Perbankan ASEAN. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(3), 713–730.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

How to Cite

Alfaridzi, H., Diah PA, E., & Wijaya Z, R. (2025). The Effect of Fraud Triangle Theory in Detecting Financial Fraud (Case Study of Food and Beverage Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2022). JAKU (Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Unja) (E-Journal), 9(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.22437/jaku.v9i4.42059

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.