The Analysis of the Types of Student Error in Solving Mathematical Problems based on the Anderson’s Taxonomy

Authors

  • Komang Tri Purnamayanthi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Nengah Suparta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Gde Suweken Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v12i01.14747

Keywords:

Anderson’s taxonomy, error analysis, type of error

Abstract

This study analyzed student errors in answering questions with levels C1-C6 based on Anderson's taxonomy on the topic of a three-variable system of linear equations. The research was conducted with a descriptive qualitative approach in which the data were collected through test and interviews by taking 30 tenth grade students at Santo Joseph Senior High School Denpasar as the subjects. Students were given 6 math problems, which were then analyzed for errors and followed by interviewing students to find the cause of their errors. The results of the percentage of student errors based on the type of error were incomplete answers at 46.8%, technical errors at 25.5%, errors in understanding the previous material at 16.6%, language misinterpretation at 5.5%, data misuse at 4.5%, and unverified solutions at 1.1%. From the results of the interviews, it was found that the causes of the errors were poor time management, low motivation to try to solve problems, not understanding the problem, not doing re-examination, being careless, errors in assuming that occurred due to students' spontaneous thinking without examining the meaning of the problem, students did not understand the concept that was related to procedures in solving problems, and less attention to the results of the answers made. The results indicated that there were errors at each level, especially at higher levels which have an impact on the need to increase practice questions at levels C4, C5, and C6 so that the students’ understanding is better and the motivation to solve the problems given is increased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhassora, N. S. A., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, H. (2017). Newman Error Analysis on Evaluating and Creating Thinking Skills. Man In India, 19(97), 413–427.

Alhassora, N. S. A., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, H. (2017). Newman Error Analysis on Evaluating and Creating Thinking Skills. Man In India, 19(97), 413–427.

Aryani, I., Maulida, & Hasanah. (2020). Kemampuan Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Siswa SMP IT Nurul Islah Banda Aceh Pada Materi Perbandingan. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 4(1), 85–89. http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi.

Bethany. (2016, August 24). “3 Types of Math Errors and How to Prevent Themâ€. Math Geek Mama. https://mathgeekmama.com/types-of-math-errors/.

Elbrink, M. (2008). Analyzing and Addressing Common Mathematical Errors in Secondary Education. BS Undergraduate Mathematics Exchange, 5(1), 2–4.

Hamzah, B. U., & Masri, K. U. (2009). Mengelola Kecerdasan dalam Pembelajaran Sebuah Konsep Pembelajaran Berbasis Kecerdasan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Harimukti, R. (2015). Kemampuan Analisis, Evaluasi, dan Kreasi Siswa SMP Nuris Jember dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. [Thesis, Universitas Jember].

Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 302.

Larrain, M., & Kaiser, G. (2019). Analysis of students’ mathematical errors as a means to promote future primary school teachers’ diagnostic competence. Unipluriversidad, 19(2), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.19.2.02.

Legutko, M. (2008). An Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Errors in the Teaching-Research Process. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 141-152.

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given†in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9.

Movshovitz-Hadar, N., Zaslavsky, O., & Inbar, S. (1987). An Empirical Classification Model for Errors in High School Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/749532.

Mu’minah, K. I. (2018). Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Pada Pokok Bahasan Aritmatika Sosial. [Thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta].

Pomalato, S. W., Ili, L., Ningsi, B. A., Fadhilaturrahmi, Hasibuan, A. T., & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Student error analysis in solving mathematical problems. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5183–5187. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081118

Priyani, H. A., & Ekawati, R. (2018). Error analysis of mathematical problems on TIMSS: A case of Indonesian secondary students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012010

Purnama, T. (2017). Pengaruh Teknik Umpan Balik Tertulis terhadap Kemampuan Mengevaluasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas XI IPA di SMAN 1 Dawan. [Thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha].

Riccomini, P. J. (2005). Identification and remediation of systematic error patterns in subtraction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593661.

Rusyani, E., Ratnengsih, E., Putra, A. S., Maryanti, R., Fitria, D., Husaeni, A., & Ragadhita, R. (2022). Indonesian Journal of Community and The Drilling Method Application Using Abacus to Arithmetic Operations Skills in Student with Hearing Impairment at Special School. Indonesian Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 2(1), 1–10.

Santoso, D. A., Farid, A., & Ulum, B. (2017). Error Analysis of Students Working about Word Problem of Linear Program with NEA Procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 855(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012043

Schnepper, L. C., & McCoy, L. P. (2013). Analysis of Misconceptions in High School Mathematics. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 15(1), 625–625. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1066

Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi siswa pada pelajaran matematika: studi pendahuluan pada siswa yang menyenangi game. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia, 224–232.

Stanley, T., & Moore, B. (2013). Critical Thinking and Formative Assessments. Critical Thinking and Formative Assessments. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856261.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Umay, A. (2003). Matematiksel muhakeme yeteneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(24), 234–243.

Wahyuni, I., & Rahman, A. M. I. (2017). The Effect Of Implementing Drill Method Towards Learning Result And Motivation Based On Initial Mathematics Ability. International Conference on Natural and Social Sciences 2017, 209–216.

Wibawa, A. K. 2014. Defragmenting Proses Berpikir melalui Pemetaan Kognitif untuk Memperbaiki Berpikir Pseudo Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Limit Fungsi. [Thesis, Universitas Negeri Malang].

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1–8.

Yang, C. W., Sherman, H., & Murdick, N. (2011). Error Pattern Analysis of Elementary School-Aged Students with Limited English Proficiency. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 4(1), 50-67. DOI: 10.1080/24727466.2011.11790309.

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Purnamayanthi, K. T., Suparta, I. N., & Suweken, G. (2022). The Analysis of the Types of Student Error in Solving Mathematical Problems based on the Anderson’s Taxonomy . Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(01), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v12i01.14747