High-Level Thinking and TPACK of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in the 21st Century Learning

Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto; Anton Jaelani

doi:10.22437/edumatica.v11i03.14338

Authors

Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto
Anton Jaelani Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i03.14338

Keywords:

high-level thinking, mathematics learning, TPACK

Abstract

In the 21^st century, learning requires high-level thinking processes and mastery of technology. The benefits of using technology accompanied by high-level thinking include 1) having many alternative solutions to problems, 2) be a good co-worker, and 3) being more independent in finding solutions. Also, learning mathematics is one of the main lessons in class and has the main characteristics of structured learning and has a systematic flow. The attributes of existing mathematics learning may support the technology learning process, which also has an orderly system and algorithm. This study employed a cross-sectional survey-it exploring high-level thinking and TPACK in mathematics learning. The subject was 182 pre-service mathematics teachers in Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia. This study showed high-level thinking, and TPACK indicated that the item was sufficient to perform factor analysis. The analysis results found that the Kaiser Meyer-Oikin (KMO) value for items in the high-level thinking construct questionnaire with 12 items showed 0.657 (l> 0.50). Subsequently, in TPACK construct questionnaire with 32 items showed 0.783. The results stated that higher-order thinking is the essential capital in learning mathematics. Therefore, learning mathematics also demands the dynamism of technological developments to support the success of learning mathematics.

References

Aldama, C. De, & Pozo, J. I. (2017). How are ICT Used in the Classroom? A Study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Uses. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 14(39). https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.39.15062

Anggoro, B. S., Kusumah, Y. S., Darhim, & Afgani, J. D. (2014). EnhancAnggoro, B. S., Kusumah, Y. S., Darhim, & Afgani, J. D. (2014). Enhancing Students Critical Thinking Ability In Mathematics By Through Improve Method. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 4(5), 68-78.ing Students Critical Thinking Ability In Mathematic. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 4(5), 68-78.

Arifa, F. N., & Prayitno, U. S. (2019). Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan: Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru Prajabatan dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Guru Profesional di Indonesia. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v10i1.1229

Bhattacharjee, B., & Deb, K. (2016). Role of ICT in 21 st Century’s Teacher Education. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(1), 1-6.

Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275

Borromeo, E., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). Relationships Between Mathematics Teachers’ Acceptance of Computer Supported-open Learning Environments and Their Beliefs: A Survey Study in Italian Lower Secondary Schools. Edulearn11: 3Rd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 3(July), 262-271.

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. In Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods (Vol. 5). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534

Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., … Choi, Y. (2014). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Mathematical Content and Pedagogical Knowledge, Teachers’ Perceptions, and Student Achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 419-459. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0419

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education. In Research Methods in Education. Eighth edition. | New York: Routledge, 2018.: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Connie, C. (2020). Teacher Perceived Impact of Technology on Elementary Classrooms and Teaching. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 7(2), 147-173.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

DoÄŸan, M. (2012). Prospective Turkish Primary Teachers’ Views About the Use of Computers in Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(4), 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9214-3

Drijvers, P. H. M., Monaghan, J., Thomas, M., & Trouche, L. (2017). Use of Technology in Secondary Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(3), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814525725_0008

Eynde, P., & Corte, E. (2020). Students’ Higher Order Thinking and Achievement for Mathematics Learning. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 4(2), 23-37.

Farisi, M. I. (2016). Developing the 21st Century Social Studies Skills Through Technology Integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(January), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.47374

Fu, J. S. (2019). TPACK in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 112. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1541

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Pearson Education Limited.

Ibrahim, M. S., & Wekke, I. S. (2009). The Integration of ICT in the Teaching and Learning Processes : A Study on Smart School of Malaysia. 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (EDUTE’ 09), 5(2), 189-197. Retrieved from http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2009/lalaguna/EDUTE/EDUTE-28.pdf

Kaput, J. J., & Thompson, P. W. (1994). Technology in Mathematics Education Research: The First 25 Years in the JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 676. https://doi.org/10.2307/749579

Kelvin, J. (2020). Digital Technologies in the Classroom. Journal for Research in Math Education, 3(2), 11-23.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5

Lamichhane, B. R. (2018). TPACK about Mathematics and Instructional Practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, VIII(February), 14-22.

Lisa, M. (2020). TPACK Level and Students Construction in Mathematics Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic Situation. Journal of Education and E-Learning, 4(3), 221-235.

Maesuri, D. (2018). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) pada Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah di Manado. Jurnal Sains Dan Matematik, 31(2), 1-19.

Mapolelo, D. C., & Akinsola, M. K. (2015). Preparation of Mathematics Teachers: Lessons from Review of Literature on Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs, and Teacher Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-4-18

Muhtadi, D., Wahyudin, Kartasasmita, B. G., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). The Integration of Technology in Teaching Mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(21), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012020

Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2016). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 31-44.

Patahuddin, S. M., Lowrie, T., & Dalgarno, B. (2016). Analysing Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK Through Observation of Practice. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5-6), 863-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0305-2

Paul Chow, & Pepe, T. M. (2019). Teacher’s Attitudes Towards Technology in the Classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(April), 21-38.

Piaw, C. Y. (2016). Mastering Research Methods (2nd ed.; S. Han, ed.). Malaya: McGraw-Hill Education.

Puspitarini, E. W., & Sunaryo, S. (2018). Pemodelan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK). Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 3(2), 1-8.

Rahmadi, I. F. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.32493/jpkn.v6i1.y2019.p65-74

Restiana, N. (2018). Evaluasi Profil TPACK untuk Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Banten. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i2.14438

Richard, H. (2018). Managing Problem Solving Learning for Developing Students’ Creativity in Classroom. Journal of Education for Teaching, 3(14), 113-121.

Schlesinger, Z., & Wang, W. I. (2019). Higher Order Thinking Skills and the Evolution of Learning Technology in the 21 Century. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(3), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92784-6

Syah, R., Darmawan, D., & Purnawan, A. (2019). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Literasi Digital. Jurnal Paedagogi, 10(2), 60-69.

Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology, 1(1), 59-60. https://doi.org/10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787

Talib, N., Yassin, S. F. M., Nasir, M. K. M., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2016). Integrating Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge in Computer Programming Courses: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 27(1), 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.akademiabaru.com/doc/ARDV27_N1_P1_13.pdf

Trisnawaty, W., Citrasukmawati, A., & Thohir, M. A. (2017). Self Assessment for Student Performance Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills in Physics Learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(4), 446-452. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.6456

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & MÃ¤kitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK Updated to Measure Pre-service Teachers’ Twenty-first Century Skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518

van Borkulo, S. P., Kallia, M., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2019). Computational Thinking and Mathematical Thinking: Digital Literacy in Mathematics Curricula. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching - ICTMT 14, 6(October), 384-386. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/56474455/PROPUES_TPM.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B filename%3DDiseno_de_un_plan_de_Mantenimiento_Prod.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20200314%2Fus-e

Vinoth, N., & Nirmala, K. (2017). Deaf Students Higher Education System Using E-Learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i1.5131

Wahyuni, F. T. (2019a). Hubungan antara Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) dengan Technology Integration Self Efficacy (TISE) Guru Matematika. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA (KUDUS), 2(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.21043/jpm.v2i2.6358

Wahyuni, F. T. (2019b). Hubungan Antara Techonological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) dengan Technology Integration Self Efficacy (TISE) Guru Matematika di Bengkulu. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA (KUDUS), 2(2), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.21043/jpm.v2i2.6358

Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The Perceptions of Teachers and Students on a 21st Century Mathematics Instructional Model. 12(2), 193-215.

Weippert, Achim and Kajewski, S. (2017). Internet-based Information and Communication Systems - a Case Study Analysis. Journal Basic of Education, 2(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00005-5

Widodo, S. A., & Turmudi, T. (2017). Guardian Student Thinking Process in Resolving Issues Divergence. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(4), 432-438. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.5639

Yigit, M. (2014). A Review of the Literature: How Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Develop Their Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.96390

Yoppi, W. P. (2017). Menjadi Guru Matematika: Antara Peluang dan Tantangan Teknologi untuk Masa Depan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(November), 1-8.

Yuli, S. (2017). Analisa Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Matematika di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika PARADIKMA, 33(4), 11-23.