Studentâ€™s Thinking Process in Geometry Problem Solving Reviewed from Personality Types Hippocrates-Galenus

Dhea Madanti Nilamsari; Harina Fitriyani

doi:10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.12120

Authors

Dhea Madanti Nilamsari Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Harina Fitriyani Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.12120

Keywords:

geometry problem solving, hippocrates-galenus personality type, Piagetâ€™s theory, thinking process

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to describe the thinking process of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems in terms of personality types sanguine, choleric, melancholic, and phlegmatic. The thinking process used is based on Piaget's theory which consists of assimilation and accommodation processes. This study used a descriptive qualitative approach and was conducted in one of the state junior high schools in Pangkalpinang. The subjects in this study consisted of 4 students of class VII. Subject selection using the purposive technique. The instruments used were researchers, personality type questionnaires, math problem-solving test questions, and interview guidelines. The validity of the data is done by technical triangulation. Data analysis in this study used the Miles and Huberman model. The results showed that sanguine and phlegmatic subjects carried out assimilation thinking processes at all stages of Polya's problem solving for all types of questions. Choleric subjects and melancholic subjects carried out assimilation thinking processes at all stages of Polya for world problem type questions with abstract context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, R., & Farida, N. (2015). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMK dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Phlegmatis. AKSIOMA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1â€“8.

Burte, H., Gardony, A. L., Hutton, A., & Taylor, H. A. (2020). Elementary Teachersâ€™ Attitudes and Beliefs about Spatial Thinking and Mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00221-w

Desmita. (2016). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Rosda.

Dorko, A. (2019). Generalization, Assimilation, and Accommodation. The Mathematics Educator, 28(2), 33â€“51.

Efendi, M. Y., & Abidin, Z. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Problem Solving dalam Menyelesaikan Teka Teki Matematika ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian. Jurnal Edukasi: Kajian Ilmi Pendidikan, 3(1), 1â€“16.

Hamidah, K., & Suherman, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 231â€“248. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.38

Indonesia, P. R. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 1â€“21. www.hukumonline.com

Kuswana, W. S. (2011). Taksonomi Berpikir. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lefa, B. (2014). The Piaget Theory of Cognitive Development: An Educational Implications. Educational Psychology, 1(1), 1â€“8.

Mayasari, D., Utomo, D. P., & Cholily, Y. M. (2019). Analisis Metakognisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Hipocrates. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 34â€“39. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm

Mcleod, S. (2018). Jean Piagetâ€™s Theory of Cognitive Development Schemas. Developmental Psychology, Simply Psychology, 1936, 1â€“9.

Miles, M., Huberman, M., & SaldaÃ±a, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (3rd ed.).

Nasional, M. P. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI nomor 22, tahun 2006, tentang standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dan menengah. april, 1â€“9.

Nurdin. (2016). Alur Berpikir Mahasiswa Koleris dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Langkah Polya. Jurnal Pendidikan BUM, 1(1), 14â€“19. www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id

Nurdin, Samad, I. S., & Sardia. (2020). Logical Reasoning Analysis based on Hippocrates Personality Types. Aksioma, 9(2), 57â€“73.

Octaviani, C., Hartoyo, A., & Sayu, S. (2018). Proses Penyelesaian Masalah berdasarkan Tahapan Polya ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(6), 1â€“9.

Oktaviyanthi, R. (2011). Profil Daya Matematis Siswa ditinjau dari Kecenderungan Kepribadian. UNESA.

Polya, G. (1973). How to Solve It. Princeton University Press.

Razak, F., Sutrisno, A. B., & Kamaruddin, R. (2018). Deskripsi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Langkah Polya ditinjau dari Kepribadian Siswa Tipe Melankolis. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.1047

Sudarman. (2011). Proses Berpikir Siswa Quitter pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Edumatica, 1(2), 15â€“24. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/3278

Suparno, P. (2001). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Peaget. Kanisius.

Suryabrata, S. (2015). Psikologi Kepribadian. Rajawali Press.

Thobroni, M., & Musthofa, A. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran (Pengembangan Wacana dan Praktik Pembelajaran dalam pembangunan Nasional). Ar-Ruzz Media.

Widyastuti, R. (2015). Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Teori Polya ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Climber. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 183â€“194. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.48