Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Tes Two-Tier Multiple Choice Berbasis Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas VII Pada Tema Hujan Asam
(Development of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Test Evaluation Instruments Based on Science Literacy for Class VII Students on Acid Rain Theme)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i1.17305Abstract
This research is motivated by the low scientific literacy skills in Indonesia based on the results of the 2015 PISA survey and the limitations of teachers in measuring students' scientific literacy skills so that they have not been developed optimally. The purpose of this study is to develop and determine the level of feasibility of the Two-Tier Multiple Choice test evaluation instrument based on scientific literacy on the theme of acid rain. The research method used is the research and development method with the ADDIE development model (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluate) which in the development process is only at the Analyze, Design, Development, and Evaluate stages. The results of research and development in the form of a Two-Tier Multiple Choice test evaluation instrument based on scientific literacy on the theme of acid rain indicate that the product developed is very feasible based on assessments by material experts, evaluation experts, and three teachers with a total of 40 questions and gets a score the average is 97% based on material experts, 96% based on evaluation experts, 98% based on science teachers 1, 78% based on science teachers 2, and 99.8% based on science teachers 3. very feasible category with the overall average score of the validation has a percentage of 95%.
Key words: Â Development research, Two-Tier Multiple Choice, Science Literacy skill, Acid rain
Â
Abstrak. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains di Indonesia berdasarkan hasil survey PISA tahun 2015 dan keterbatasan guru dalam mengukur kemampuan literasi sains siwa sehingga belum dikembangkan secara optimal. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengembangkan serta mengetahui tingkat kelayakan instrumen evaluasi tes Two-Tier Multiple Choice berbasis literasi sains pada tema hujan asam. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian dan pengembangan (research and development) dengan model pengembangan ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluate) yang dalam proses pengembangannya hanya pada tahapan Analyze, Design, Development, dan Evaluate. Hasil dari penelitian dan pengembangan berupa instrumen evaluasi tes Two-Tier Multiple Choice berbasis literasi sains pada tema hujan asam menunjukkan bahwa produk yang dikembangkan sangat layak berdasarkan penilaian oleh ahli materi, ahli evaluasi, dan tiga guru dengan jumlah soal sebanyak 40 butir soal dan mendapat skor rata-rata yaitu 97% berdasarkan ahli materi, 96% berdasarkan ahli evaluasi, 98% berdasarkan guru IPA 1, 78% berdasarkan guru IPA 2, dan 99,8% berdasarkan guru IPA 3. Kesimpulannya, dari 40 soal yang dikembangkan keseluruhan berada dalam kategori sangat layak dengan skor rata-rata keseluruhan validasi memiliki persentase sebesar 95%.
Kata kunci: Penelitian pengembangan, Two-Tier Multiple Choice, Kemampuan
literasi sains, hujan asam
Downloads
References
Antari, W. D., Sumarni, W., Harjito, & Basuki, J. (2020). Model Instrumen Test Diagnostik Two Tiers Choice Untuk Analisis Miskonsepsi Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(1), 2536-2546.
Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer.
Cahyani, S. M. R. T., Sjaifuddin, S., & Nestiadi, A. (2022). Pengembangan Media Edukatif Monopoly pada
Pembelajaran IPA di Kelas VII SMP Tema Pelestarian Lingkungan. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 315-321.
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess the Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4.
Damayanti, D. R., Yamtinah, S., & Utomo, S. B. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Tema Mata Sebagai Alat Optik. INKUIRI : Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v7i2.22984.
Depdiknas. (2011). Panduan Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Secara Terpadu. Jakarta: Direktotat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar.
Dindar, A. C., & Geban, O. (2011). Development of a three-tier test to assess high school students’ understanding of acids and bases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 600–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.147.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. . (2012). How To Design and Evaluate Research In Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hasasiyah, S. H., Hutomo, B. A., Subali, B., & Marwoto, P. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP pada Materi Sirkulasi Darah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.193.
Hesti, H, Riani, E, Khastini, R.O. & Sjaifuddin, S. (2022). Pemanfaatan Hasil Penelitian Pengaruh Logam Berat Cu Terhadap Pertumbuhan Udang Windu (Penaeus monodon) Sebagai Sumber Belajar Biologi Pada Subkonsep Pencemaran Lingkungan SMA. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 434-442.
Hidayah, N., Rusilowati, A., & Masturi, M. (2019). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP/MTs di Kabupaten Pati. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 9(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2019.9.1.3601.
Hikmah, N., Yamtinah, S., Ashadi, & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2017). Analisis Validitas Isi Instrumen Computerzed Two-Tier Multiple Choice (CTTMC) Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Materi Termokimia. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 21, 40–45.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Sains. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Kristyasari, M. L., Yamtinah, S., & Utomo, S. B. (2017). Analisis Validitas Isi Computerized Two-Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Mengukur Literasi Sains Siswa. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 21, 266–273. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/11425.
Kurniasih, N., & Haka, N. B. (2017). Penggunaan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X Pada Materi Archaebacteria Dan Eubacteria. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 8(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v8i1.1270.
Lestari, S. M., Sjaifuddin, S., & Resti, V.D.A. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Lomba Cerdas Cermat IPA SMP Berbasis ICT (Information and Communication Technology) dengan Aplikasi Quizizz. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 531-540.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Noprianti, E., & Utami, L. (2017). Penggunaan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Disertai Cri Untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Siswa. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v2i2.1876.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment And Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic And Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018). PISA For Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal OfEducational Research, 103, 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002.
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 34–42.
Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan Aspek Literasi Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY 2017.
Riduwan. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ridwan. (2016). Peran Sains dan Teknologi Informasi di Era MEA. 2(1), 13–20.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
Sjaifuddin, S., Hidayat, S., Fathurrohman, M., Ardie, R., & El Islami, R.A.Z. (2019). The Development of Food Security Behavior Model Through Environmental-based Learning: a System Dinamics Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII), 8(2), 230-240.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic Assessment in Science As a Means to Improving Teaching, Learning and Retention. UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings, 1–9.
Utami, T.P., Sjaifuddin, S., & Berlian, L. (2022). Pengembangan Soal Uraian Berbasis Indikator Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan pada Manusia untuk Siswa Kelas VIII SMP/Mts. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 129-135.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aulia Dinar Septiani, Sjaifuddin Sjaifuddin, Liska Berlian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, copyright is retained by the authors and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
