Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Menggunakan Two-Tier Test Berbantuan Certainty Of Response Index
(Misconception Identification of Students using Two-Tier Test Assisted by Certainty of Response Index)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i2.12812Abstract
The misconception is a problem in learning and it is very necessary to solve it so that learning is better. Students who are identified with misconceptions on material concepts can make it difficult for them to believe new concepts that are true. The purpose of this study is to identify the existence of misconceptions in students in an ecosystem material concept that they have studied previously. This study uses a descriptive method with a quatitative approach. The research was conducted at Senior High School (SMA) in Sukabumi Regency. The subjects studied were 36 students of class XI MIPA 5. The instrument used was 45 multiple choice questions with the help of the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). The results showed the understanding of students in the percentage of conceptual understanding (PK), understanding the concept of being unsure (PKKY), Misconception (M), and not knowing the concept (TTK) were 20%, 6%, 32%, 42%. The highest misconception percentage at level 1 after testing was at the indicator describing the relationship between ecosystem components (60%), level 2 understanding the pattern of interactions between organisms (53%), and the lowest on indicators showing succession definition (12%). Therefore, misconceptions among students in ecosystem material need to be eliminated by choosing the right method, learning model, and approach.
Abstrak.
Miskonsepsi merupakan permasalahan di dalam pembelajaran dan sangat perlu dilakukan penyelesaian agar suatu pembelajaran lebih baik. Peserta didik yang teridentifikasi miskonsepsi pada suatu konsep materi dapat membuat mereka sulit dalam mempercayai konsep baru yang benar. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengidentifikasi adanya miskonsepsi pada peserta didik dalam suatu konsep materi ekosistem yang telah mereka pelajari sebelumnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Penelitian dilakukan di Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) yang berada di Kabupaten Sukabumi. Subjek yang di teliti merupakan 36 peserta didik kelas XI MIPA 5. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa 45 soal pilihan ganda beralasan berbantuan Certainty of Respon Index (CRI). Hasil penelitian menunjukan pemahaman peserta didik dalam persentase paham konsep (PK), paham konsep kurang yakin (PKKY), Miskonsepsi (M) dan Tidak tahu konsep (TTK) adalah 20%, 6%, 32%, 42%. Perolehan persentase miskonsepsi tertinggi pada level 1 setelah pengujian berada pada indikator mendeskripsikan hubungan antar komponen ekosistem (60%), level 2 memahami pola interaksi antar organisme (53%) dan terendah pada indikator menunjukan devinisi suksesi (12%). Maka dari itu miskonsepsi pada peserta didik dalam materi ekosistem perlu dihilangkan dengan memilih metode, model pembelajaran dan pendekatan yang tepat.
Downloads
References
Ahsanul Qadri Pebrianto, Mu’nisa, A., & Muis, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Menggunakan Metode Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Ekosistem Kelas XI MIA MAN 1 Jeneponto. Jurnal Biology Teaching and Learning, 3, 124–131.
Alonemarera, A. S. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Pada Materi Genetika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Indeks (Cri). Jurnal Biotek, 8(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v8i2.16320
Anggrayni, S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2019). The validity of Four-Tier’s misconception diagnostic test for Work and Energy concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1), 0–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012037
Anjarsari, P. (2018). The Common Science Misconceptions in Indonesia Junior High School Students. Journal of Science Education Research, 2(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v2i1.19329
Çepni, S., Ülger, B. B., & Ormanci, Ü. (2017). Pre-service science teachers’ views towards the process of associating science concepts with everyday life. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10208
Chyleńska, Z. A., & Rybska, E. (2019). What can we do for amphibians and reptiles at schools? Between personal conceptions, conceptual change and students’ pro-environmental attitudes. Animals, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080478
Desain, A., Gnss, J., Fungsi, B., Kasus, S., Geoid, T., & Kota, G. (2019). Analisis Desain Jaring Gnss Berdasarkan Fungsi Presisi (Studi Kasus : Titik Geoid Geometri Kota Semarang). Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 8(1), 48–55.
Ekon, E. E., & Edem, N. B. (2018). Conceptual Change Pedagogy and Its Effects On Students’ Cognitive Achievement and Interest in Biology. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 9(2), 3407–3413. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2018.0456
Eromosele, O. E., Ekholuenetale, M., & ... (2016). On misconceptions of ecological concepts among publicsenior secondary schools students in Benin city Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 27(1), 109–118. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hossain_Mohammad_Ismail2/publication/330702270_01_International_Journal_of_Innovation_and_Scientific_Research/links/5dfb263ea6fdcc28372bf499/01-International-Journal-of-Innovation-and-Scientific-Research.pdf#page=112
Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J. (2018). Professionalizing pre-service biology teachers’ misconceptions about learning and the brain through conceptual change. Education Sciences, 8(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030120
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Hakim, A., Liliasari, & Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 544–553.
Herawati. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran ecirr berbantuan conceptual change text terhadap miskonsepsi siswa pada konsep gerak parabola. Jakarta : UIN.
Hermita, N., Suhandi, A., Syaodih, E., Samsudin, A., Isjoni, Johan, H., Rosa, F., Setyaningsih, R., Sapriadil, & Safitri, D. (2017). Constructing and Implementing a Four Tier Test about Static Electricity to Diagnose Pre-service Elementary School Teacher’ Misconceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012167
Ikram, R. L., Setiawani, S., Pambudi, D. S., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Persamaan Kuadrat Satu Variabel Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Kadikma, 9(3), 204–215.
Jahidin, J., & Rabani, L. (2018). Miskonsepsi ekologi: Sebuah analisis hasil tes kompetisi sains Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i1.7287
Kurniasih, N., & Haka, N. B. (2017). Penggunaan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X Pada Materi Archaebacteria Dan Eubacteria. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 8(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v8i1.1270
Maesyarah, M., Jufri, A. W., & Kusmiyati, K. (2015). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Dan Miskonsepsi Biologi Dengan Teknik Modifikasi Certainty of Response Index Pada Siswa Smp Se-Kota Sumbawa Besar. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 10(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v10i1.8
Muna, I. A. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pgmi Pada Konsep Hukum Newton Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (Cri). Cendekia: Journal of Education and Society, 13(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v13i2.251
Nikmah, K., & Suyono. (2015). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Conceptual Change Untuk Meremediasi Miskonsepsi Pada Konsep Asam-Basa Siswa Kelas XII IPA SMAN 1 Waru Sidoarjo. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 4(3), 541–550.
Nurhidayah, L., Riandi, R., & Solihat, R. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada topik ekosistem. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 3(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v3i1.23303
Patil, S. J., Chavan, R. L., & Khandagale, V. S. (2019). Identification of Misconceptions in Science: Tools , Techniques & Skills for Teachers. Aarhat Multidisciplinary International Education Research Journal (AMIERJ), 8(2), 466–472.
Pebrianti, D. (2014). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Perubahan Konseptual Untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Fisika Pada Siswa Kelas X Sman 1 Praya Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 2(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v2i1.296
Purwanti, W. M., & Kuntjoro, S. (2020). Profil Miskonsepsi Materi Ekologi Menggunakan Four-Tier Test pada Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA. BioEdu: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 9(3), 414–421. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu
Qurrota, A., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2108–2117.
Ramadhani, R., & Hasanuddin, A. M. . (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Reproduksi Manusia Kelas Xi Ipa Sma Unggul Ali Hasjmy Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi, 1(1), 1–9.
Sinta, T., Lestari, N. A., Wijayati, N., & Haryani, S. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Materi Asam Basa Menggunakan Two-Tier Berbantuan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Chemistry in Education, 9(2), 48–54.
Tayubi, Y. R. (2005). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal UPI, 24(3), 4–9.
Upu, H., Talib, A., & Tahir, S. H. (2020). Deskripsi Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Perpangkatan Siswa Kelas XI Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index ( CRI ). Issues in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 41–51. http://www.ojs.unm.ac.id/imed
Waluyo, E. M., Muchyidin, A., & Kusmanto, H. (2019). Analysis of Students Misconception in Completing Mathematical Questions Using Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.2988
Published
Versions
- 2020-06-01 (2)
- 2021-06-01 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Herfine Fristiansa Firman, Jujun Ratnasari, Sistiana Windyariani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, copyright is retained by the authors and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
