Community satisfaction index on the quality of academic and non-academic services at Jambi University

Authors

  • Junaidi Junaidi Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Amri Amir Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Syaparuddin Syaparuddin Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v9i6.11233

Keywords:

Community Satisfaction Index, Service quality, User expectations

Abstract

This study aims to measure the community satisfaction index regarding the academic and non-academic services provided by Jambi University. The data used are sourced from community surveys involving students, alumni, faculty members, and administrative staff who receive services at Jambi University (faculties, institutes, units). The analytical tool used is descriptive statistical analysis. The analysis results show that the community satisfaction index for the quality of services at Jambi University is 76.09, falling within the service quality interval "C," indicating "less good" performance. Based on the assessment aspects, it is observed that out of 11 aspects, 5 are categorized as good (score B), and 6 are categorized as less good (score C). No aspects are categorized as very good (score A). Based on the total CSI scores for each faculty, out of the seven evaluated faculties, three are categorized as good, while the other four are categorized as less good. Of the six service aspects assessed, only the performance of the environmental aspect meets user expectations, with a gap value of 105.00. In other words, the quality performance of the environmental aspect has met and even exceeded user expectations. Conversely, the performance of the other five aspects has not fully met user expectations. The aspect with the lowest performance in meeting user expectations is the process aspect, with a gap value of 98.92

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tjiptono, F., & Chandra, G. (2016). Pemasaran jasa: Prinsip, penerapan dan penelitian. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Kemenpan RB. (2004). Keputusan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor: Kep/25/M.Pan/2/2004 tentang pedoman umum penyusunan indeks kepuasan masyarakat unit pelayanan instansi pemerintah.

Kemenpan RB. (2017). Pedoman penyusunan survei kepuasan masyarakat unit penyelenggara pelayanan publik. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017 Nomor 708.

Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing management: The millennium edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kotler, P. (2002). Manajemen pemasaran: Edisi millenium, jilid 1. Jakarta: Prehallindo.

Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2016). Principles of marketing (15th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Manajemen pemasaran (13th ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rizan, M. (2020). Survei indeks kepuasan masyarakat (IKM) pengguna jasa layanan kesehatan BPJS di RS Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia (JRMSI), 11(2), 2301-8313. http://doi.org/10.21009/JRMSI

Muhammad, M. (2019). Sosialisasi "Pelayanan publik secara online berbasis website" di Desa Balusu Kecamatan Balusu Kabupaten Barru. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Al-Gazali Barru.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1998). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40

Poltekes Pontianak. (2019). Laporan indeks kepuasan akademik Poltekkes Kemenkes Pontianak.

RSUD HM Chotib Quzwain. (2016). Indeks kepuasan masyarakat terhadap pelayanan publik RSUD HM Chotib Quzwain tahun 2016.

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2010). Services marketing: Strategy. In J. N. Sheth & N. K. Malhotra (Eds.), Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

Junaidi, J., Amir, A., & Syaparuddin, S. (2022). Community satisfaction index on the quality of academic and non-academic services at Jambi University. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 9(6), 513 - 525. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v9i6.11233