Peer Review Proccess

1. Every Submitted manuscript will go thorugh double blind review process.
2. The review process considering the novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references
3. Reviewers have to provide written feedback in a timely manner on the benefits of scientific and scientific value of the work
4. Avoid personal comments or criticism
5. Notify the editor immediately if unable to review in a timely manner and if possible, provide the names of other potential reviewers
6. Pay attention to ethical concerns, such as the substantial similarity between the last text and any text papers published or submitted to another journal.
7. Ensure that articles published comply with the standards of the journal
8. Protect readers from incorrect or flawed research and studies that can not be validated by others

Every submitted article will be independently reviewed by two peer reviewers. The review process applies Double Blind method. The decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation.  After being reviewed, there will be four kinds of editor decision based on reviewers recommendation:

> Accept Submission: The submission will be accepted without revisions.
> Revisions Required: The submission will be accepted after minor changes have been made.
> Resubmit for Review: The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. It will require a second round of review, however.
> Decline Submission: The submission will not be published in the journal.