Development of Learning Tools Based on the TPACK Framework on Reaction Rate Material to optimize Student HOTS

Lendriadi Lendriadi; Sutrisno Sutrisno; Syamsurizal Syamsurizal

doi:10.22437/teknopedagogi.v9i2.32774

Authors

Lendriadi Lendriadi SMAN 8 Muaro Jambi
Sutrisno Sutrisno Universitas Jambi
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/teknopedagogi.v9i2.32774

Keywords:

HOTS, Learning Activities, Rates Reaction, TPACK Workframe

Abstract

This kind of research is development research. The subjects of research are 31 students of class XI IPA 2 SMAN 8 in Muaro Jambi. The instrument used a questionnaire responses of students, teachers' questionnaire responses, observation sheet of learning activity, HOTS assessment instruments, and TPACK integration instruments of teachers. The results are indicated on learning activities at the meeting I 96.15%, meeting II 96.68%, meeting III 97.22%, and meeting IV 97.22% , all of them belong to the category of "highly optimized". Student test scores on average 66 which includes the category of "good".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelraheem, A., Asan, A.The effectiveness of inquiry-based technology enhancedcollaborative learning environment. International Journal of Technology in Teaching andLearning, 2(2), 65-87.

Aksela, Maija. 2005. Supporting Meaningful Chemistry Learning and Higher- order Thinking through Computer-Assisted Inquiry: a Design Research Approach.Disertasi.

Amarlita, D, Mega. 2010. Identifikasi Kesalahan Konsep Materi Laju Reaksi pada Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Pagak dan Perbaikannya dengan Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. UM: Thesis.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Aunurrahman, 2009. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Asyhar, Rayandra. 2011. Kreatif Mengembangkan Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: GaungPersada Press.

Babateen, H. M., 2011, The Role of Virtual Laboratories in Science Education, International Comference on Distance Learning and Education IPCSIT.,12: 100-103.

DePorter, Bobbi. 2010. Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaifa.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. 2010. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis TIK. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Frei, S., Gammil, A, and Irons, S. 2007. Integrating Technology into The Curriculum. USA: Shell Education.

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. 2009. Teachers’ Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge and learning Activity Types: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (p. 393-416).

Haris, J., Blanchard, M.R, & Hofer, M. 2011. Science Learning Activity Types. Retrieved from College of William and Mary, School of Education, Learning Activity Types Wiki.

Hennesy, S, Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., Velle, L., McFarlane, A., Ruthven, K., and Winterbottom, M. 2007. Pedagogical Approaches for Technology-Integrated Science Teaching. Journal Computer & Education (p. 137-152).

Harahap, M, Nurhafni, 2011. Pengaruh Penggunaan Laboratorium Virtual Dibandingkan Dengan Laboratorium Riil Dengan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Aktifitas dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA Pada Pokok Bahasan Laju Reaksi. Unimed: Thesis.

Lane, Jill & Cawley, Joanne. Issue Reaction: Inquiry-Based Learning in the College Classroom. Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education: Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference 2001.

Lane, Jill. Inquiry-Based Learning Schreyer Insttitute For Teaching Excellence Penn State 301 Rider building University Park, PA 16802, 7-15-2007.

Koehler, M dan Mishra, 2008. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators, Routlledge for the American Association of Colleges for TeachernEducation, New York.

Rais, M. 2010. Project-Based Learning: Pembelajaran yang Berorientasi Soft Skills, disajikan pada seminar Nasional Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 11 Desember.

Railsback, J. 2002. Project-Based Instruction: creating Excitement for Learning. Northwest Regional education Laboratory.

Rooney, Caitriona. 2009. How am I Using Inquiry-Based Learning to Improve My Practice and to Encourage Higher Order Thinking Among My Students of Mathematics.Educational Journal of Living Theories Volume 5.

Schunk, H., Dale. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective Edisi ke- 6 (terjemahan). Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.

Siregar, Haroan, 2011. Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Animasi Komputer Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA. Unimed: Thesis.

Sproken-Smith, Rachel. 2007. Experiencing the Process of Knowledge Creation: The Nature and Use of Inquiry-Based Learning in Higher Education. University of Otago, New Zealand.

Sutrisno, 2012. Kreatif Mengembangkan Aktivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis TIK. Jakarta: GaungPersada (GP Press).

Sutrisno, 2011. Pengantar Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis TIK. Jakarta: Gaung Persada (GP Press).

Tim Penyusun, 2012. Pedoman Penulisan Tesis. Jambi: Universitas Jambi.

Trianto. 2011. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Utami, Budi, et el. 2007. Kimia Untuk SMA Kelas XI Program Ilmu Alam. Surakarta: Haka MJ.

Yusnita, Selvi, 2011. Pengaruh Penerapan Virtual dan Real Lab Berbasis Cooperative Learning Terhadap Aktifitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Termokimia. Unimed: Thesis.

Warsita, Bambang., 2008. Teknologi Pembelajaran “Landasan dan Aplikasinya”. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Widyoko, E., P. 2012. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zoller, U., Miri, B., David, B. 2007.Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking. Res SciEduc (2007) 37:353-369.