Analsis determinan yang mempengaruhi perdagangan luar negeri Indonesa terhadap dua negara yang terlibat perang dagang Amerika Serikat VS China

Penulis

  • Emilia Emilia Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan Fak. Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi
  • Adi Bhakti Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan Fak. Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi
  • Candra Mustika Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan, Fak. Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jpe.v16i3.14342

Kata Kunci:

Import-export, Exchange Rate, Labor, Total population

Abstrak

The purpose of this study is to analyze how Indonesia's exports and imports compared to the United States and China and to investigate how the exchange rate, labor force, and population influence Indonesia's imports from China and the United States. The results show that Indonesia's exports to the United States and Indonesia's exports to China are 2.02, while the average comparison of Indonesian imports from the United States and Indonesia's imports from China is 1.31. the average is more significant when compared to Indonesia's exports and imports with China. Based on the regression results, the exchange rate variable has a significant negative effect on Indonesia's exports and imports with the United States and China. The labor variable has a significant positive impact on Indonesia's exports and imports to the United States and China. In contrast, the population variable significantly affects Indonesia's exports to the United States. It does not substantially affect Indonesian imports from the United States and does not dramatically affect Indonesia's exports and imports with China.

 

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Asian Development Bank.(2018). Key indicators for Asia and Pasific 2017-2018. Asian Development Bank Statistics.

Darman, Darman. (2016). Analisis ekspor-impor dan indeks harga konsumen pada pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 16(1), 39-50

Dornbusch, Rudiger, Stanley Fischer, Richard Startz.(2004). Macroeconomics. 9th Edition. McGraww-Hill: New York

Fatmawati. (2015). Analisis pengaruh perdagangan luar negeri dan hutang terhadap PDB.Jurnal JESP.Universitas Negeri Malang: Malang

Gaspersz, Vincent. (1997). Manajemen kualitas penerapan konsep-konsep kualitas dalam manajemen bisnis total. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta.

Gujarati, Damodar N. (2003). Basic econometrics. Fourth edition, International Edition. MC Grow Hill: New York

Gujarati, Damodar N.(2004). Basic econometrics. 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill: New York

Haryadi. (2007). Ekonomi internasional teori dan kebijakan. Biografika: Bogor

Kuswantoro dan Gita Rosianawati. (2016). Analisis pengaruh PDB riil,Cadangan devisa dan Nilai tukar rupiah terhadap impor non migas Indonesia, Jurnal Ekonomi Qu (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi), 6(2), 166-190

Mankiw, George N. (2001). Macroeconomics. 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill: New York

Nopirin. (2003). Ekonomi Intrenasional, BPFE UGM: Yogyakarta

Pradnyani dkk. (2018). Pengaruh variabel makro ekonomi terhadap penyaluran ekspor impor dengan metode pembayaran letter of credit. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research. 4(1), 44-50

Sims, Christoper. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica. 48(1), 1-48 (48

Yeti Andriani, Andre. (2017). Implikasi perjanjian kemitraan ekonomi komprehensif Indonesia Australia terhadap perdagangan luar negeri. Andalas Journal of International Studies, 6(1), 79-92

Yusuf, dan Widyastutik. 2007. Analisis pengaruh ekspor-impor komoditas pangan utama dan liberalisasi perdagangan terhadap neraca perdagangan Indonesia.Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, IPB. 4(1), 46-56s

Zamzami,Z; & D Hastuti, S Sunargo. (2020). Pengaruh ekspor Asia Timur terhadap pengangguran di Indonesia, Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 15 (1), 59-74

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2021-08-07

Cara Mengutip

Emilia, E., Bhakti, A. ., & Mustika, C. . (2021). Analsis determinan yang mempengaruhi perdagangan luar negeri Indonesa terhadap dua negara yang terlibat perang dagang Amerika Serikat VS China . Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 16(3), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.22437/jpe.v16i3.14342