Comparative Effectiveness of Handwashing with Electrolyzed Oxidized Water (EOW) and Antiseptic Soap on Reducing Hand Bacterial Counts

Authors

  • Maria Estela Karolina
  • fadli fadli
  • Erny Kusdiyah
  • Wahyu Indah Dewi Aurora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/esehad.v1i1.10765

Keywords:

hand washing, EOW, antiseptic

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background : Hands are a moving medium that is able to move microorganisms from one place to another, from sick people to healthy people, from dirty surfaces to clean surfaces. Therefore washing hands as an effort to maintain hand hygiene is one of the most important actions in preventing the transmission of disease-causing microorganisms both in the environment of everyday life and in preventing high rates of patient morbidity and mortality in health facilities such as hospitals, health centers, and other consequences. nosocomial infections or what is known as Health-care Associated Infections (HAIs). The purpose of this research was to compare the effectiveness of washing hands with seven steps using electrolyzed oxidized water (EOW) and antiseptic soap in maintaining hand hygiene.
Methods: This type of research is an analytical study with a pretest-posttest two-group experiment design with random sampling. The research sample was 96 students by swab cotton sticks between their fingers. The cotton swabs were grown in nutrient agar on a petri dish and the colonies count was counted after incubation 16-18 hours in an incubator at 37o Celsius. Data analysis will use statistics with a statistical value of p <0.1.
Results: The effectiveness of hands washing with EOW and antiseptic soap can be described as the difference in the number of germ colonies in the seven-step hand washing group with EOW and the difference in the number of germ colonies in the seven-step hand washing group using antiseptic soap. The results of statistical analysis with the Mann Whitney test showed insignificant results p = 0.792. Where the p value <0.1, there is no difference between washing hands with seven steps using EOW with antiseptic soap.
Conclusion: There is no difference in the effectiveness of washing hands using EOW with antiseptic

References

1. Koseki, S., Yoshida, K., Kamitani, Y., & Itoh, K. (2003). Influence of inoculation method, spot inoculation site, and inoculation size on the efficacy of acidic electrolyzed water against pathogens on lettuce. Journal of Food Protection®, 66(11), 2010-2016. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14627276/

2. Kasai, H., Ishikawa, A., Hori, Y., Watanabe, K. I., & Yoshimizu, M. (2000). Disinfectant effects of electrolyzed salt water on fish pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 66(6), 1020-1025. https://oamonitor.ireland.openaire.eu/rfo/sfi_rfo/search/publication?pid=10.2331%2Fsuisan.66.1020

3. Nghia Bui, Vuong & Khong, Nguyen & T. PHAM, Nga & N. BUI, Anh & D. DAO, Tung & T. NGUYEN, Thanh & T. NGUYEN, Hoa & Trinh Quang, Dai & Inui, Ken & UCHIUMI, Hiroshi & OGAWA, Haruko & Imai, Kunitoshi. (2017). Potential of electrolyzed water for disinfection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 79(4), 726–729. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28216545/

4. Park, Y. B., Guo, J. Y., Rahman, S. M. E., Ahn, J., & Oh, D. H. (2009). Synergistic effect of electrolyzed water and citric acid against Bacillus cereus cells and spores on cereal grains. Journal of food science, 74(4), M185-M189 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19490337/

5. Tkhawkho, Linda & Jackson, Karen & Nitzan, Orna & Peretz, Avi. (2017). Destruction of Clostridium difficile spores colitis using acidic electrolyzed water. American Journal of Infection Control. 45. 1053. 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.026. https://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(17)30844-1/pdf

6. Yang, H., Swem, B. L., & Li, Y. (2003). The Effect of pH on Inactivation of Pathogenic Bacteria on Fresh-cut Lettuce by Dipping Treatment with Electrolyzed Water. Journal of Food Science, 68(3), 1013-1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb08280.x

7. Issa-Zacharia, Abdulsudi & Kamitani, Yoshinori & Tiisekwa, Adili & Morita, Kazuo & Iwasaki, Koichi. (2010). In vitro inactivation of Escherichia Coli, Staphylococcus Aureus and Salmonella spp. using slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 110. 308-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20547336/

8. Ye, Zhangying & Wang, Shuo & Chen, Tao & Gao, Weishan & Zhu, Songming & He, Jinsong & Han, Zhiying. (2017). Inactivation Mechanism of Escherichia coli Induced by Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water. Scientific Reports. 7:6279. 10.1038/s41598-017-06716-9.

9. Vorobjeva NV, Vorobjeva LI, Khodjaev EY. The bactericidal effects of electrolyzed oxidizing water on bacterial strains involved in hospital infections. Artif Organs. 2004;28:590–592. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15153153/

10. Park, H., Hung, Y. C., & Brackett, R. E. (2002). Antimicrobial effect of electrolyzed water for inactivating< i> Campylobacter jejuni during poultry washing. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 72(1), 77-83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11843416/

11. Nakano, Takashi & Hayashi, Hideki & Wu, Hong & Shimamoto, Chikao & Sano, Kouichi. (2015). Disinfection potential of electrolyzed strongly acidic water against Mycobacteria: Conditions of disinfection and recovery of disinfection potential by reelectrolysis. Biomedical research (Tokyo, Japan). 36. 109-13. https://doi.org.10.2220/biomedres.36.109.

12. Izumi, H. (1999). Electrolyzed Water as a Disinfectant for Fresh-cut Vegetables. Journal of Food Science, 64(3), 536-539. https://seward.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/food-microbiology-carrot-peppers-spinach-radish-potato-TVC-stomacher-400.pdf

13. Hao, J., Liu, H., Chen, T., Zhou, Y., Su, Y. C., & Li, L. (2011). Reduction of Pesticide Residues on Fresh Vegetables with Electrolyzed Water Treatment. Journal of food science, 76(4), C520-C524. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22420563/

14. Deza, M. A., Araujo, M., & Garrido, M. J. (2003). Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of tomatoes by neutral electrolyzed water. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 37(6), 482-487. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14633103/

15. S. Shigeto, K. Matsumoto and H. Yaguchi, “Acidic Electrolyzed Water in the Disinfection of the Ocular Surface,” Experimental Eye Research, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-6.doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1999.0776

16. Hati, Subrota & Mandal, Surajit & S Minz, P & Vij, Shilpa & Khetra, Yogesh & Singh, Brij Pal & Yadav, Dipika. (2012). Electrolyzed Oxidized Water (EOW): Non-Thermal Approach for Decontamination of Food Borne Microorganisms in Food Industry. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 3. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2012.36102.

17. M. Boyce, John. (2016). Modern technologies for improving cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces in hospitals. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0111-x.

18. Pintaric, Robert & Joze, Matela & Pintaric, Stefan. (2015). Suitability of electrolyzed oxidizing water for the disinfection of hard surfaces and equipment in radiology. Journal of environmental health science & engineering. 13. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-015-016

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17