The Influence of Remuneration, Work Environment, and Workload on Organizational Commitment and Employee Performance at Pondok Pesantren Islam Ulul Albab

Authors

  • Ahsan Imam Muttaqin Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Juwaini Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Rudi Hartono Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v10i2.58772

Keywords:

Employee Performance , Organizational Commitment, Remuneration, Work Environment, Workload

Abstract

This study examines the influence of remuneration, work environment, and workload on organizational commitment and employee performance at Pondok Pesantren Islam (PPI) Ulul Albab, South Lampung, Indonesia. An explanatory quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design was employed. Data were collected using a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire from 69 permanent employees (a 71.8% response rate out of a population of 96, obtained through total sampling) and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4.1.1.8. Hypothesis testing shows that work environment has a positive and highly significant effect on both organizational commitment and employee performance. Remuneration significantly strengthens organizational commitment but has no significant effect on performance. Workload shows no significant effect on organizational commitment, yet has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, contrary to the initially hypothesized direction. The model explains 73.2% of variance in organizational commitment (strong) and 32.6% in employee performance (moderate). Within a religiously grounded pesantren work ecosystem, a socially and spiritually conducive work environment is the primary driver of commitment and productivity. Remuneration reinforces emotional attachment, while workload, reframed as religious trust, functions as a productive challenge. These findings offer strategic implications for designing holistic human resource policies aligned with Islamic values.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

Anwar, Y. (2021). The effect of compensation on lecturer's commitment (Survey on lecturers of private universities in North Sumatera). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Pajak (EJAK), 1(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.51688/ejak.v1i1.41

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.

Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65

Gallup Incorporated. (2026). State of the global workplace 2026 report: The human side of the AI revolution.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7

Hadziq, A., Sulthon, M., Amin, N., & Raharjo. (2024). Pesantren dan disabilitas: Praktik sosial dan dinamika pendidikan anak berkebutuhan khusus. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v9i2.11147

Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2016). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Indripriarko, G., & Havidz Aima, M. (2022). Effect of work environment and compensation on employee performance with job satisfaction as a mediation variable. JRSSEM: Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.36418/jrssem.v2i2.249

Kurdi, S., Fauzi, M., & Hani, U. (2025). Pengaruh motivasi, beban kerja, dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja guru TPQ dan Madin Futuhiyah Candiroto Kendal. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Ekonomi, 3(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.54066/jmbe-itb.v3i1.2874

LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Compensation (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

PwC. (2023). Asia Pacific workforce hopes and fears survey 2023: Is the workforce ready for reinvention? www.pwc.com/asiapacific

Sumiatik, S., Sarkum, S., & Ritonga, Z. (2021). Analisis pengaruh kompensasi, motivasi, lingkungan kerja, kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan komitmen organisasi sebagai variabel intervening. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomika, 11(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v11i2.2720

Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5114

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12