A century of India’s economic transformation: a critical review
The objective of this study is to examine India’s transformation from a colonial to a modern economy on the basis of the macro-economic level changes that have occurred over the last century. This is important because it will help us to understand the associated growth performance and its impact on sectoral changes and employment in the wider context of developing economies such as India. The methodology to be followed here is derived from the aims of the study and comparisons of international statistics that provide the means by which to address the research questions and the objectives of this paper. The study found that during the colonial period, the Indian economy became subservient rather than sovereign in terms of policy matters. As a result, economic development was hampered by the removal of ‘surplus’, along with very high land rents and tribute charges. A densely populated country like India was drawn into the orbit of exploitation in the mid-18th century. Soon after independence in 1947, the Indian government took a number of initiatives to enhance industrial and agricultural development, but the biggest failure was that it did not make any real impression on the country’s huge unemployment problems.
Ahluwalia, M.S. (2002). “Economic Reforms in India since 1991: Has Capitalism Worked?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3), 67-88.
Bagchi, A.K. (2010). Colonialism and Indian Economy, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bhagwati, J. and A. Panagariya. (2013). Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and Lessons for other Developing Countries, New York: Public Affairs.
Chandrasekhar, C. P. (2013). “Fragile Foundation: Foreign Capital and Growth after Liberalisation.” Social Scientist, 41(1/2), 17–33.
Chandrasekhar, C.P. & Jayati Ghosh (2002) The Market That Failed: Neoliberal Economic Reforms in India, New Delhi: Leftword.
Das, K. & H. Sagara. (2017). “State and the IT Industry in India: An Overview”, Economic and Political Weekly, LII (41), 56-64.
Das Gupta, C. (2016). State and Capital in Independent India: Institutions and Accumulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dreze, J. and A. Sen. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions, London: Allen Lane.
Ferguson. N. (2009). Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, London: Penguin.
Girdner, E. J. & K. Siddiqui. (2008). “Neoliberal Globalization, Poverty Creation and Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Environment and Development, 5(1), 1–27.
IMF (International Monetary Fund). (2017). World Economic Outlook, October. https://uk.ask.com/youtube?q=imf+world+economic+outlook&v=voJJrEKQL2Y. (accessed on 5 January 2018).
Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the World Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maddison, A. (2003). The World Economy: Historical Statistics, Paris: OECD.
Ministry of Finance. (1991-92) “Budget Speech 1991-92”, 24 July, New Delhi. http://indiabudget.nic.in/bspeech/bs199192.pdf. (accessed on 5 June 2016).
Nagaraj, R. (1997). “What Has Happened Since 1991? Assessment of India’s Economic Reforms”, Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 2869-2879, November 8.
Nagaraj, R. (2015). “Can the Public Sector Revive the Economy? Review of the Evidence and a Policy Suggestion” Economic and Political Weekly, L (5), 41-46, January 31.
Nagaraj, R. (2017). “Economic Reforms and Manufacturing Sector Growth: Need for Reconfiguring the Industrialisation Model” Economic and Political Weekly. LII (2), 61-68, January 14.
Nayyar, D. (2017). “Economic Liberalisation in India: Then and Now”, Economic and Political Weekly, 52(2), 41-48.
OECD Economic Survey: India, (2017). February, Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/INDIA-2017-OECD-economic-survey-overview.pdf. (accessed on 6 January 2018)
Patnaik, P. (2014). “Imperialism and the Agrarian Question”, Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 3(1), 1-15.
Patnaik, P. (2015). “The Nehru-Mahalanobis Strategy”, Social Scientist, 43(3-4), 3-10.
Patnaik, P. (2016). “Capitalism and India’s Democratic Revolution” Social Scientist, 44 (1/2), 3-15.
Rodrik, D. (2016). “Premature Deindustrialization”, Journal of Economic Growth, 21: 1-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3.
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, New York: Oxford University Press.
Siddiqui, K. (1990). “Historical Roots of Mass Poverty in India” in edited by C.A. Thayer, J. Camilleri, and K. Siddiqui. Trends and Strains. 59-76, New Delhi: Peoples Publishing House. ISBN 81-85364-16-8.
Siddiqui, K. (1996). “Growth of Modern Industries under Colonial Regime: Industrial Development in British India between 1900 and 1946”, Pakistan Journal of History and Culture, 17(1), 11-59
Siddiqui, K. (1998). “The Export of Agricultural Commodities, Poverty and Ecological Crisis: A Case Study of Central American Countries”, Economic and Political Weekly 33(39),A128-A137.
Siddiqui, K. (1999). “New Technology and Process of Differentiation: Two Sugarcane Cultivating Villages in UP, India”, Economic and Political Weekly 34 (52), A39-A53.
Siddiqui, K. (2009). “The Political Economy of Growth in China and India.” Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(2), 17–35. DOI: 10.1080/17516230902734528.
Siddiqui, K. (2010). “Globalisation and Neo-liberal Economic Reforms in India: A Critical Review”, in edited by S. K. Pramanick and R. Ganguly. Globalization in India: New Frontiers and Emerging Challenges, 219-243, New Delhi: Prentice Hall, ISSN: 978-81-203-4038-1.
Siddiqui, K. (2012). “Developing Countries Experience with Neoliberalism and Globalisation.” Research in Applied Economics, 4(4), 12–37.
Siddiqui, K. (2014a). “Contradictions in Development: Growth and Crisis in Indian Economy.” Economic and Regional Studies, 7(3), 82–98.
Siddiqui, K. (2014b). “Growth and Crisis in India’s Political Economy from 1991 to 2013.” International Journal of Social and Economic Research, 4(2), 84-99, April-June. Online ISSN: 2249-6270. DOI:10.5958/2249-6270.2014.00487.5
Siddiqui, K. (2016a). “International Trade, WTO and Economic Development.” World Review of Political Economy, 7(4), 424–450.
Siddiqui, K. (2016b). “Will the Growth of the BRICs Cause a Shift in the Global Balance of Economic Power in the 21st Century?” International Journal of Political Economy, 45(4), 315–338.
Siddiqui, K. (2017a). “Hindutva, Neoliberalism and the Reinventing of India.” Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 4(2), 142–186.
Siddiqui, K. (2017b). “Capital Liberalization and Economic Instability.” Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 4(1), 659–677.
Siddiqui, K. (2018a). “The Political Economy of India's Post-Planning Economic Reform: A Critical Review”, World Review of Political Economy 9(2): 235-264, summer, Pluto Journals. ISSN 2042–891X (Print) ISSN 2042–8928 (Online).
Siddiqui, K. (2018b). “India’s Economic Reforms and Challenges for Industrialisation”, Journal of Perspectives on Financing and Regional Development, 6(1), 1-21. (online). URL: https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/JES/article/view/5209
Srivastava, R. (2012). “Changing Employment Conditions of Indian Workforce and Implications for Decent Work”, Global Labour Journal, 3(1), 63-90.
Sunderland, J.T. (1929). India in Bondage; Her Right to Freedom and A Place among the Great Nations, New York: Lewis Copeland.
Tharoor. S. (2017). Inglorious Empire: What British did to India, London: Penguin Books.
UNIDO. (2014). International Year of Industrial Statistics, Vienna, https://www.unido.org/resources/publications/flagship-publications/annual-report/annual-report-2014. (accessed on 5 March 2018)
World Bank. (2017). World Development Report - Governance and Law, Washington DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2017 (accessed on 5 February 2018).
World Bank. (2016). “Dancing with the Giants: China, India, and the Global Economy.” World Bank Report, Washington D.C.: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6632. (accessed on 10 July 2017).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Kalim Siddiqui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.