The effect of distribution supply fertilizer on rice production improvement in Gorontalo City

Authors

  • Amir Halid Agribusiness Study Department, Post Graduated Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Heldy Vanni Alam Agribusiness Study Department, Post Graduated Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Hamdi H. Payuyu Agribusiness Study Department, Post Graduated Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v5i4.5067

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to: 1) analyze the distribution of subsidized fertilizer in Gorontalo City, 2) analyze the distribution of subsidized fertilizers partially (right price, right amount, and time) to increase rice production in Gorontalo City. The study conducted in Gorontalo City with a sample number of 95 farmers. The research method used is survey method. Data analysis used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that there are two distributors fertilizer in Gorontalo City is PT. Indonesian Trade Company (PT PPI) and Indonesian Trade Cooperative (KPI), and 5 authorized retailers which are distributing subsidized fertilizer is Kios Tani Lestari, Anugerah Tani Kios, Saprodi Tani Kios, Cahaya Tani Kios and Bunga Tani Kios. PT. PPI is responsible for distributing NPK, SP36 and ZA fertilizers while KPI is responsible for the distribution of Urea fertilizer. Distribution of subsidized fertilizer on rice farming simultaneously have a positive and real effect on increasing rice production, while partially that have positive and real influence that is Right price, Right amount and time to increase rice production

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buchari, Alma. (2007), “Manajemen Pemasaran & Pemasaran Jasa”. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta

Dinas Pertanian, (2017). Provinsi Gorontalo, Gorontalo

DKPP, 2017.Kota Gorontalo. Gorontalo

Gujarati, Damodaar N, (2006), “Basic Econometrics, Fourd Edition, McGraw Hill Co

Khairunisya, (2009),“Efektifitas Penyaluran Pupuk Bersubsidi Bagi Petani Padi Di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah” (Studi Kasus : Lini IV Kecamatan Trimurjo).

Ogheneruemu, OBI-EGBEDI. Abdul Hameed, BANKOLE Olaide. (2017). Determinants of Participation in Fertilizer Subsidy Programme Among Rice Farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agriculturan Economics Vol. 9 (6), pp, 162-167, June 2017

Permenpan, (2016). Jakarta

Rini Desi Puspo. (2006). Analisis Pengaruh Pupuk Bersubsidi Terhadap Kinerja Industri Pupuk di Indonesia. Tesis.Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Rodrigo, Chatura. Abeysekera, lakmal. (2015). Why The Fertilizer Subsidy Should Be Removed: key Factors That Actually Derive The Fertilizer Demand in Paddy Sector of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Economic Research Volume 3 (2) December 2015: 71-98. Sri Lanka Forum of University Economists

Saweda O, Lenis, barret, Christopher B, and Sheahan Meghan. (2014). Understanding Fertilizer For Rice Production Across Nigeria’s Diverse Agro Ecological Conditions. http//www.worldbank.org/. Annual Bank Conference onAfrica,June 23th – 24th 2014

Soekartawi. (2006). Analisis Usahatani. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Sudjana. (2002). Metode Statistika. Penerbit PT Tarsito. Bandung

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Cetakan ketujuhbelas. Penebar ALFABETA,CV. Bandung.

Wijetunga, Chatura. Saito, Katsuhiro. (2017) Evaluating The Fertilizer Subsidy Reforms in The Rice Production Sector in Sri Lanka: A Simulation Analysis. Advances In Management & Applied Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2017, 31-51

Winardi. (2005). “Strategi Pemasaran” (Marketing Strategi). Bandung: Mandar Maju

Downloads

Published

2018-06-02 — Updated on 2018-06-02

How to Cite

Halid, A., Alam, H. V., & Payuyu, M. H. H. (2018). The effect of distribution supply fertilizer on rice production improvement in Gorontalo City. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 5(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v5i4.5067