PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN STRUKTUR INISIASI, KINERJA NON FINANSIAL DAN LEVERS OF CONTROL TERHADAP KEJELASAN TUJUAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jmk.v10i03.14846Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the direct influence of leaders who use the initiation structure leadership style on the goal clarity. This study also examined the indirect effect of the relationship between the leadership style of the initiation structure on the goal clarity that was mediated by subjective diagnostics and subjective interactive. This study was tested using a sample of 152 employees who work at manufacturing, service and trading companies located in the Jabodetabek area. The research data were obtained from questionnaires distributed to respondents and analyzed using structural equation modeling - partial least square (SEM-PLS) with WarpPLS 3.0 software. The results of this study found that the direct effect of the initiation structure leadership style has a significant positive effect on the clarity of objectives. On the other hand, the indirect influence by subjective diagnostic and subjective interactive is able to partially mediate the relationship between the leadership style of the initiation structure on the goal clarity.
Downloads
References
Abernethy, M. A., Bouwens, J., & Van Lent, L. (2010). Leadership and control system design. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 2-16.
Afrizal, R. Hernando., & Wirmie Eka Putra, Y. (2020). THE LEADERSHIP STYLES, PERFORMANCE MEASURES, AND LEVERS OF CONTROL ON SUBORDINATES WORK RELATEDATTITUDES: THE INDONESIAN CASE STUDY. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 12617-12635.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.
Bisbe, J., dan Otley, D., (2004) The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting Organizations and Society, 29, pp. 709-737.
Derfuss, K. (2009). The relationship of budgetary participation and reliance on accounting performance measures with individual-level consequent variables: a meta-analysis. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 203-239.
Eccles, R., (1991) The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review (January-February): pp. 131-137.
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management accounting research, 20(4), 263-282.
Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management accounting research, 23(2), 79-119.
Gençer, M. S., & Samur, Y. (2016). Leadership styles and technology: Leadership competency level of educational leaders. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 226-233.
Hair, J., T. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sartstedt. (2013) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles; Sage.
Hansen, A. (2010). Nonfinancial performance measures, externalities and target setting: A comparative case study of resolutions through planning. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 17-39.
Hartmann, F., Naranjo-Gil, D., & Perego, P. (2010). The effects of leadership styles and use of performance measures on managerial work-related attitudes. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 275-310.
Hartono, J. (2011). Konsep dan aplikasi structural equation modeling berbasis varian dalam penelitian bisnis. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Hernando, R. (2018). The Effect of Information Asimmetry On Earnings Management In Companies That Conduct An Initial Public Offering (IPO) On The Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 16(4), 222-236.
Hernando, R. (2020). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Struktur Inisiasi, Objektif Diagnostik dan Objektif Interaktif Terhadap Kejelasan Tujuan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 18(2), 113-120.
Hernando, R., Abdurrahman, R., & Prasetyo, E. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Konsiderasi, Subjektif Diagnostik, Subjektif Interaktif Terhadap Kejelasan Tujuan. Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 8(2), 108-117.
Hernando, R., Prasetyo, E., & Abdurrahman, R. (2020). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan struktur inisiasi, subjektif diagnostik, subjektif interaktif terhadap keadilan evaluasi. Jurnal Kajian Manajemen Bisnis, 9(2), 1-11.
Hernando, R., dan Sholihin, M. (2017) “The effects of leadership styles and use of performance measures on subordinates attitudeâ€, Proceeding The 5th Gadjah Mada International Conference of Economic and Business. ISBN: 2548-7965, pp. 46.
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, organizations and society, 31(6), 529-558.
Hirst, M. K. (1983). Reliance on accounting performance measures, task uncertainty, and dysfunctional behavior: Some extensions. Journal of Accounting Research, 596-605.
Hoque, Z., & Chia, M. (2012). Competitive forces and the levers of control framework in a manufacturing setting. Qualitative research in accounting & management.
Hopwood, A. G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of accounting research, 156-182.
Lau, C. M. (2011). Nonfinancial and financial performance measures: How do they affect employee role clarity and performance?. Advances in Accounting, 27(2), 286-293.
Lau, C. M. (2015). The effects of nonfinancial performance measures on role clarity, procedural fairness and managerial performance. Pacific Accounting Review.
Lee, A., Martin, R., Thomas, G., Guillaume, Y., and Maio, G.R., (2015) Conceptualizing leadership perceptions as attitudes: Using attitude theory to further understand the leadership process, The Leadership Quarterly, 26, pp. 910-934.
Marginson, D., McAulay, L., Roush, M., & van Zijl, T. (2014). Examining a positive psychological role for performance measures. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 63-75.
Niven, P. R. (2001). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. John Wiley & Sons.
Noeverman, J., Koene, B. A., & Williams, R. (2005). Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management.
Noeverman, J., & Koene, B. A. S. (2012). Effects of managerial evaluative styles on subordinate attitudes and performance: Proposals for future research. International Journal of Management, 29 (3), 219.
Otley, D. T. (1978). Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of accounting research, 122-149.
Otley, D., & Fakiolas, A. (2000). Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4-5), 497-510.
Otley, D., & Pollanen, R. M. (2000). Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence. Accounting, organizations and Society, 25(4-5), 483-496.
Sawyer, J. E. (1992). Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences. Journal of applied psychology, 77(2), 130.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2018). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian. Edisi 6 Buku 1.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian. Edisi 6 Buku 2.
Sholihin, M., Pike, R., and Mangena, M., (2010) Reliance on multiple performance measures and manager performance, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol 11 No. 1, pp 24-42.
Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2013). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0 untuk hubungan nonlinier dalam penelitian sosial dan bisnis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Simons, R., (1995) Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Ã. (2019). Leadership styles and skills developed through game-based learning. Journal of Business Research, 94, 360-366.
Spekle, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131-146.
Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement.
Su, S., & Baird, K. (2018). The role of leaders in generating management innovation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(19), 2758-2779.
Susiana, S., Yusnaini, Y., Gaol, M. B. L., Ghozali, I., & Fuad, F. (2018). Comprehensive performance measurement system, procedural fairness and managerial performance. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(4).
Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ Levers of Control framework. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 171-185.
Vancil, R. F., & Buddrus, L. E. (1979). Decentralization: Managerial ambiguity by design. Dow Jones-Irwin.
Walumbwa, F. O., Lawler, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Leadership, individual differences, and workâ€related attitudes: A crossâ€culture investigation. Applied psychology, 56(2), 212-230.
Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, organizations and society, 32(7-8), 757-788.
Wirawan, H., Tamar, M., & Bellani, E. (2019). Principals’ leadership styles: The role of emotional intelligence and achievement motivation. International Journal of Educational Management.
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (Global ed.). Essex: Pearson.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rika Neldawaty, riski hernando
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
