Analisis Yuridis Cyber Terrorism Dalam Perspektif UU No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi & Transaksi Elektronik

Abstract

Until now, acts of terrorism have involved the use of information technology. With the change in paradigm, acts of terrorism are generally carried out using conventional methods, but currently only by using a laptop or computer with the help of the internet, they carry out a series of acts of terrorism, but there are no regulations that clearly explain the crime of cyber terrorism. ITE law. Apart from that, the regulation of cyber terrorism in Indonesia is currently sectoral as in the Criminal Code (KUHP). The author took this research: 1) To find out the criminal law regulations for eradicating cyber terrorism from the perspective of law number 19 of 2016 concerning information and electronic transactions. 2) To find out and analyze criminal law policies that can be built into preventive cyber terrorism measures. The Normative Juridical Approach is carried out to explain laws that are not needed with data and/or social facts in the perspective of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions relating to this research problem. The results and discussion show that the term cyber terrorism is still controversial, because there is no standard term to define it. One of the reasons for the uncertainty in this definition is because there is no harmonization of international or national rules in sectoral regulations (UU ITE). Therefore, criminal law policies that can be developed in preventive cyber terrorism measures include penal efforts through formulation policies, penal efforts through application policies, penal efforts through execution policies, non-penal efforts through technological approaches (techno prevention), non-penal efforts through increasing cooperation between countries (memory of understanding), and non-penal efforts through cyber deradicalization programs.