MODEL EKOSISTEM PERTAHANAN NEGARA BERBASIS KOLABORASI PEMERINTAH, INDUSTRI DAN MASYARAKAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jisipunja.v8i1.32134Kata Kunci:
dinamika pemangku kepentingan, kerangka konseptual, kolaborasi, pertahanan negaraAbstrak
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang model ekosistem pertahanan negara berbasis kolaborasi pemerintah, industri, dan masyarakat. Dengan memanfaatkan wawasan dari literatur yang ada mengenai ekosistem pertahanan kolaboratif, dinamika pemangku kepentingan, dan kerangka kerja untuk memfasilitasi kolaborasi, penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Penelitian ini mensintesis konsep, model, dan teori utama untuk mengembangkan kerangka konseptual yang menguraikan struktur pemerintahan, saluran komunikasi, dan mekanisme alokasi sumber daya yang diperlukan untuk kolaborasi efektif di sektor pertahanan nasional. Temuan dari tinjauan literatur menyoroti pentingnya peperangan yang berpusat pada jaringan, tata kelola kolaboratif, pemikiran sistem, kemitraan publik-swasta, dan teori sistem sibernetik dalam membentuk ekosistem pertahanan kolaboratif. Analisis pemangku kepentingan mengungkap beragam peran, kepentingan, dan dinamika kekuasaan pemangku kepentingan, termasuk lembaga pemerintah, kontraktor pertahanan, personel militer, dan organisasi masyarakat sipil. Kerangka konseptual mengusulkan mekanisme keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan, komunikasi, alokasi sumber daya, dan tata kelola adaptif untuk meningkatkan kolaborasi di sektor pertahanan nasional.
Kata Kunci: dinamika pemangku kepentingan, kerangka konseptual, kolaborasi, pertahanan negara
Referensi
Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., Havela, L., & Savage, G. (2015). Stakeholder dynamics during the project front‐end: The case of nuclear waste repository projects. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 15–41.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Rand Corporation.
Atkinson, C. (2018). Hybrid warfare and societal resilience implications for democratic governance. Information & Security, 39(1), 63–76.
Australian Government Department of Defence. (2020). Defence Innovation Hub. https://www.defence.gov.au/innovationhub/
Borzaga, C., & Depedri, S. (2015). Multi-stakeholder governance in civil society organizations: models and outcomes. In Civil Society, the Third Sector and Social Enterprise (pp. 109–121). Routledge.
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2020). Soft systems methodology. Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide, 201–253.
Collier, Z. A., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., Chobanova, R., & Linkov, I. (2016). Leveraging stakeholder knowledge in the innovation decision making process. . International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 6(3), 163–181.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2015). Ebook: An introduction to family therapy: Systemic theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).higbie
De Schepper, S., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in Public–Private Partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1210–1222.
Denney, J. M., Case, P. M., Metzger, A., Ivanova, M., & Asfaw, A. (2018). Power in participatory processes: Reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa. Sustainability Science, 13, 879–893.
Deverell, E., Olsson, E., Wagnsson, C., Hellman, M., & Johnsson, M. (2015). Understanding public agency communication: The case of the Swedish armed forces. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(4), 387–396.
DiMase, D., Collier, Z. A., Heffner, K., & Linkov, I. (2015). Systems engineering framework for cyber physical security and resilience. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35, 291–300.
El Fertasi, N. (2019). Why Digital Ecosystems of Civil-Military Partnerships Are a Game Changer for International Security and Defence. Information & Security, 42, 33–47.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Fontainha, T. C., Leiras, A., de Mello Bandeira, R. A., & Scavarda, L. F. (2017). Public-private-people relationship stakeholder model for disaster and humanitarian operations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 371–386.
Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., Agarwal, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2019). Business models for the circular economy: opportunities and challenges. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2).
Guha, M. (2022). Technical ecstasy: Network-centric warfare redux. Security Dialogue, 53(3), 185–201.
Hiatt, S. R., Carlos, W. C., & Sine, W. D. (2018). Manu Militari: The institutional contingencies of stakeholder relationships on entrepreneurial performance. Organization Science, 29(4), 633–652.
Higbie, K., & McCabe, D. A. (2020). Roles and Responsibilities of the Military in U.S. Defense Policy. Congressional Research Service.
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies Arlington, VA.
Howard, L. M. (2017). The Role of Civil Society in National Security Policymaking. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(4), 319–328.
Jalba, P. (2015). Network-centric warfare and some particular aspects of logistics based on networking. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 6(1), 129.
Kaska, K. (2016). Estonia’s Cyber Security Strategy. NATO CCD COE Publications.
Kilian, J. C., & Schuck, T. M. (2016). Architecture and system-of-systems design for integrated missile defense. 2016 11th System of Systems Engineering Conference (SoSE), 1–6.
Kotila, B., Drezner, J. A., Bartels, E. M., Hill, D., Hodgson, Q. E., Huilgol, S. S., Manuel, S., Simpson, M., & Wong, J. P. (2023). Strengthening the defense innovation ecosystem. RAND Corporation.
Lee, J. G., & Park, M. J. (2019). Rethinking the national defense R&D innovation system for latecomer: Defense R&D governance matrix. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 1–11.
Liu, L., Yang, Y., Gong, X., Liu, S., Zhang, F., Duan, H., & Liu, Z. (2022). Data-driven Regional Defense Technology Collaborative Innovation Visualization Research of The Development Situation. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 19–28.
Manurung, Y. S., Maarif, S., Toruan, T. S. L., & Swastanto, Y. (2023). Civil-Military Collaborative Governance Model in Natural Disaster Management in National Defense Policy. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 176–191.
Mazzucato, M., & Robinson, D. K. R. (2018). Co-creating and directing Innovation Ecosystems? NASA’s changing approach to public-private partnerships in low-earth orbit. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 166–177.
O’Hanlon, M. (2017). Beyond NATO: a new security architecture for Eastern Europe. Brookings Institution Press.
Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., Battaglia, M., & Frey, M. (2019). When democratic principles are not enough: Tensions and temporalities of dialogic stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 173–190.
Raska, M. (2015). Military innovation in small states: Creating a reverse asymmetry. Routledge.
Saint Ville, A. S., Hickey, G. M., & Phillip, L. E. (2017). How do stakeholder interactions influence national food security policy in the Caribbean? The case of Saint Lucia. . Food Policy, 68, 53–64.
Sarjito, A. (2022). The Role of The Ministry of Defense in Ensuring Food Security for State Defense. Journal of Governance, 7(3), 573–583.
Sarjito, A. (2023a). Human Resource Management in the AI Era: Challenges and Opportunities. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 211–240.
Sarjito, A. (2023b). In The Shadows of Governance: Exploring the Untamed Territories of Administrative Discretion. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 11(2), 295–310.
Sarjito, I. A., Djati, S. P., & Th, M. (2023). Manajemen Pertahanan. Indonesia Emas Group.
Sarjito, I. A., Duarte, E. P., & Sos, S. (2023). Geopolitik dan Geostrategi Pertahanan: Tantangan Keamanan Global. Indonesia Emas Group.
Scott, T. (2015). Does collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 537–566.
Solar, C. (2015). Governance of Defense and Policymaking in C hile. Latin American Policy, 6(2), 205–225.
Splidsboel Hansen, F. (2017). Russian hybrid warfare: A study of disinformation (Issue 2017: 06). DIIS Report.
Talbot, D., & Boiral, O. (2015). Strategies for climate change and impression management: A case study among Canada’s large industrial emitters. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 329–346.
Tiron, R. (2020). Defense Contractors: Trends in Global Defense Spending. Congressional Research Service.
Tisdale, S. M. (2015). Cybersecurity: Challenges from a Systems, Complexity, Knowledge Management and Business Intelligence Perspective. Issues in Information Systems, 16(3).
Ton, D. T., & Wang, W. T. P. (2015). A more resilient grid: The US department of energy joins with stakeholders in an R&D plan. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 13(3), 26–34.
Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., & Jhony, N. C. Y. (2020). Measurement of innovation resource allocation efficiency in civil–military integration enterprises. Kybernetes, 49(3), 835–851.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Aris Sarjito
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
