PRACTICES IN GENERATING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ LITERACY SET
AbstractAs stated by Nunan (1999), generally, most people read books in order to get some information or for pleasure. Through reading, people are processing ideas that generated by others. Here, the ideas are transmitted through language. It happens along with listening, and assumed by some experts to become more and more important in foreign language classroom because reading provides inputs for the students. This article reviews the theoretical framework that has been adopted in some studies of elementary shcool students’ reading comprehension. It covers some important theories of reading, teaching reading to young learners, reading comprehension and strategies in teaching reading comprehension.
Ashworth, M. & Wakefield, H. P. (2005).Teaching the world’s children: ESL for ages three to seven. Forum: English Teaching 43(1). Washington DC: US Department of State for teachers of English.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christie, J., Enz, B., & Vukelich, C. (2003). Teaching language and literacy. Boston: Pearson Education. Inc.
Curtain, H. A. & Pesola, C. A. (1988).Language and children making the match: Foreign language instruction in the elementary school. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Fisher, Bobbi. (1991). Joyful learning: A whole language kindergarten. Portsmouth: Heinemann
Ismini.(2000). Theeffectiveness of reading strategy Training in developing students’ reading ability. Unpublished. Bandung: Graduate School Indonesia University of Education.
Kismadi, G. C. (2004). Start them early: Teaching English to young learners in Indonesia. The Tapestry of English Language Teaching and Learning in Indonesia. Malang: State University of Malang Press.
Murcia, M. Celce. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Musthafa, Bachrudin. (2004). English for young learners (EFL). Bandung: PPs-UPI 2004/2005.
Nunan, David. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
Pumfrey, Peter D. (1977). Measuring reading abilities: Concepts, sources and application. London. Hodder and Stoughton, Inc.
Singhal, M. 1988. A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schema. Meena@azstarnet.com.file://A:Singhal-reading L1L2.html
Slattery, M. & Willis, J. (2001).English for primary teachers: A handbook of activities and classroom language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, N. B. & Robinson, H. A. (1980).Reading instruction for today’s children.(2nd Ed.). London: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Taylor, B.B., Harris, L.A., & Pearson, P.D. (1988).Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing, Inc.
Tierney, R.J., Readence, J. E., & Dishner, E.K. (1990).Reading strategies and practices:A compendium.(3rded.). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Tinker, M.A. & McCullough, C.M. (1975).Teaching elementary reading.(4thed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walker, R. et al. (1992). Rethinking reading: Teaching all the children to read. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Weaver, Constance. (1994). Reading process and practice. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).