Toxicological Evaluation and Food Safety Assessment of
Xylooligosaccharides Derived from Rice Straw Xylan Hydrolysis
using Recombinant Endo-β-1,4-D-Xylanase:
An Acute Oral Toxicity Study

Article

Putra Vergian
1,a
, Anak Agung Istri Ratnadewi
1,b
*
, Cahyaningtyas Tetta Riandy
1,c
, Riesma
Rukmana
1,d
, Evi Umayah Ulfa
2,e
, Tri Agus Siswoyo
3,f
, Mei Syafriadi
4,g

1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Jember, Jember 68121,
Indonesia

2
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia

3
Graduate School of Biotechnology and PUI-BioTIn, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia

4
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia

A
bstract

Xylooligosaccharides
(XOS)
are
recognized
as
prebiotics
that
stimulate
the
proliferation
of
probiotic
bacteria and enhance short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. Due to their physicochemical stability,
XOS have potential applications in functional foods; however, safety evaluation is essential, particularly
when produced from lignocellulosic biomass without purification. This study evaluated the acute oral
toxicity
of
a
crude
hydrolysate
containing
XOS
obtained
from
rice
straw
xylan
hydrolyzed
using
recombinant
endo-β-1,4-D-xylanase
expressed
in
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae.
The
product
was
administered without further purification. Male Wistar rats received a single oral dose of 2000 mg/kg
body
weight
and
were
observed
for
14
days
following
OECD
Guideline
420
(Fixed
Dose
Method).
Parameters
toxicity
evaluated
included
body
weight,
clinical
signs,
hematological
and
biochemical
indices,
as
well
as
macroscopic
and
histopathological
alterations.
Signs
of
toxicity
were
observed
as
changes in stool consistency within the first 4 to 24 hours. The estimated oral LD
₅₀
was 2000 mg/kg body
weight, with treatment-related mortality observed in 3 of 5 mice at this dose level. Based on these results,
the test substance was classified into Category 4 according to the OECD Globally Harmonized System
(GHS). Histopathological examination revealed mild to moderate degenerative changes in the liver and
kidney tissues, while serum biochemical parameters remained within normal physiological ranges. These
findings indicate moderate acute toxicity of the unpurified XOS-containing hydrolysate at high doses.
Therefore,
the
observed
effects
cannot
be
attributed
solely
to
XOS
but
may
also
arise
from
other
hydrolysis by-products. Further purification and sub-chronic toxicity studies are required to confirm the
intrinsic safety of XOS for food applications.

Keywords:
Hematological, histological, recombinant xylanase, toxicity, wistar rats

*
Corresponding author
Email addresses:
istri_dewi.fmipa@unej.ac.id
(Anak Agung Istri Ratnadewi)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/chp.v10i1.49759
Received
November 13
rd
2026;
Accepted
April 07
th
2026;
Available online
May 19
st
2026
Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Chempublish Journal. This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
)
78

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

I
n
agricultural
biotechnology,
genetically
engineered products have raised significant
social
impacts
and
ethical
concerns.
Public
awareness regarding the potential effects of
biotechnological products on human health
has
increased,
highlighting
the
importance
of
consumer
protection.
Food
safety
analyses
must
be
grounded
in
scientific
evidence, and products should be rigorously
evaluated
for
their
suitability
for
human
consumption. According to the guidelines of
the
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
and
the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO),
all
biotechnology-derived
foods
must
undergo
assessments
for
allergenicity
and
toxicity. In Indonesia, Regulation Number 27
of 2018 issued by the Badan Pengawas Obat
dan Makanan (BPOM) outlines the standards
for
the
safety
evaluation
of
food
raw
materials.
The
introduction
of
new
technologies,
including
genetically
engineered
products,
may
influence
the
microbiological, toxicological, allergenic, and
nutritional
properties
of
raw
materials.
Consequently,
comprehensive
food
safety
assessments
are
essential
to
ensure
that
such
products
meet
regulatory
standards
and are safe for public consumption
[1,2]

Xylooligosaccharides
(XOS)
are
sugar
oligomers
composed
of
xylose
units
linked
by
β-(1
→
4)
xylosidic
bonds,
with
the
molecular
formula
C
₅ₙ
H
₈ₙ₊₂
O
₄ₙ₊₁
and
a
degree of polymerization (DP) ≤ 20
[3,4,5]
. As
prebiotics,
XOS
are
indigestible
but
exert
beneficial
effects
on
host
health
by
stimulating
the
growth
and
activity
of
intestinal microbiota
[6]
. XOS naturally occur
in
fruits
and
vegetables;
however,
their
amounts are generally insufficient to provide
measurable
health
benefits.
Therefore,
to
meet
daily
requirements,
XOS
must
be
consumed
as
a
dietary
supplement.
In
healthy adults, the minimum intake of XOS
required
to
confer
health
and
prebiotic
benefits
ranges
from
1.4
to
5.0
g
per
day
[7,8]
.

XOS,
as
prebiotics
derived
from
enzymatic
hydrolysis, have been successfully obtained
from biomass residues or agro-industrial by-
products
[9,10]
.
The
prebiotic
potential
of
cassava
pulp–derived
XOS
has
been
demonstrated
both
in
vitro
and
in
vivo,
particularly
through
its
ability
to
stimulate

79
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

the
growth
of
probiotic
bacteria
and
enhance
short-chain
fatty
acid
(SCFA)
production
[11]
.
Compared
with
other
prebiotics,
XOS
exhibit
distinct
advantages,
including
greater
stability
at
elevated
temperatures
and
tolerance
across
a
relatively broad pH range. The XOS obtained
from
biomass
residues
in
this
study
are
classified
as
genetically
engineered
products,
as
they
are
produced
via
hydrolysis using recombinant endo-β-1,4-D-
xylanase
[4]
.

The
enzyme
was
originally
identified
from
microorganisms
inhabiting
the
termite
gut,
known
for
their
efficient
lignocellulose-
degrading capability. The xylanase-encoding
gene
was
subsequently
isolated
and
introduced
into
a
heterologous
expression
system to produce a recombinant enzyme in
a
new
host,
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
[12]
.
The
selection
of
S.
cerevisiae
as
the
expression
host
was
based
on
its
long
history of safe use in food biotechnology and
its classification as Generally Recognized As
Safe
(GRAS)
by
the
U.S.
Food
and
Drug
Administration
(FDA).
This
strategy
enables
the production of xylanase in a food-grade
host system while maintaining the catalytic
properties
of
the
original
termite-derived
enzyme.
Nevertheless,
despite
the
GRAS
status of the host organism, the safety of the
final
XOS
product
generated
through
recombinant enzymatic processing must be
independently
demonstrated
through
toxicological evaluation.

Several previous studies have reported the
prebiotic
properties
and
general
safety
of
XOS derived from various biomass sources
[13]
.
However,
toxicological
data
remain
limited
for
XOS
specifically
produced
from
rice straw xylan using recombinant xylanase
systems. Differences in substrate origin and
production methodology may influence the
physicochemical
characteristics
and
biological
responses
of
the
resulting
oligosaccharides.
To
the
best
of
our
knowledge,
no
study
has
systematically
evaluated the acute oral toxicity of rice straw
derived
XOS
produced
via
recombinant
endo-β-1,4-D-xylanase
in
a
mammalian
model.
This
represents
an
important
scientific
and
regulatory
gap
in
the
development of functional food ingredients
derived from agricultural residues.

Therefore,
the
present
study
aimed
to
evaluate the acute oral toxicity of rice straw
derived XOS by determining the LD
₅₀
value
and
assessing
hematological
parameters,
clinical
biochemical
profiles,
macroscopic
pathology, and histopathological alterations.
The
findings
of
this
study
are
expected
to
provide
novel
toxicological
evidence
supporting
the
safe
application
of
recombinant
enzyme
produced
XOS
as
a
functional food ingredient
[14,15,16]
.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The
materials
used
in
this
study
included
phosphate–citrate buffer (pH 7), chloroform
for
animal
anesthesia,
and
10%
neutral
buffered
formalin
(NBF).
Xylooligosaccharides
(XOS)
were
prepared
through
enzymatic
hydrolysis
of
xylan
derived
from
rice
straw using
recombinant
endo-β-1,4-D-xylanase
expressed
in
a
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
host. Albino Wistar
rats
of
either
sex,
aged
6–8
weeks
and
weighing
200–250
g,
were
obtained
from
Wistar
Farm,
Malang,
East
Java,
Indonesia.
The animals were housed in standard cages
and maintained under controlled laboratory
conditions.
Experimental
protocols
were
conducted in accordance with BPOM (2022)
guidelines. The experimental use of animals
was
approved
by
the
Ethics
Committee
of
the Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Jember
(Approval No. 2882/UN25.8/KEPK/DL/2024).
Prior to experimentation, the animals were

80
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

acclimatized for one week and provided with
a standard pellet diet and water ad libitum.

Crude XOS productions

Xylan
extracted
from
rice
straw
was
dissolved in phosphate–citrate buffer (pH 7)
at
a
concentration
of
0.8%
(w/v).
The
substrate was hydrolyzed with endo-β-1,4-D-
xylanase at a ratio of 1:1 in a water bath at
40
°C
for
24
h
[11].
The
hydrolysate
containing xylooligosaccharides (crude XOS)
was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 15 min, and
the supernatant was concentrated by freeze-
drying.

Acute toxicity

Healthy
male
Wistar
rats
were
used
in
accordance
with
the
Regulation
of
the
Indonesian
National
Agency
of
Drug
and
Food
Control
(BPOM)
No.
10
of
2022
concerning
acute
oral
toxicity
testing.
All
animals
were
fasted
overnight
with
free
access
to
water
and
weighed
prior
to
XOS
administration. The acute oral toxicity study
was
conducted
using
the
fixed-dose
procedure.
A
total
of
11
experimental
animals were used in this acute oral toxicity
study.
Two
animals
were
assigned
to
the
sighting
study
(one
at
300
mg/kg
body
weight and one at 2000 mg/kg body weight),
while
the
remaining
nine
animals
were
allocated
to
the
main
study.
In
the
main
study,
the
animals
were
randomly
divided
into
two
groups:
a
control
group
(n
=
5),
which
received
distilled
water,
and
a
treatment group (n = 4), which received the
limit dose of XOS. Animals were observed for
mortality,
acute
toxicity
signs,
and
behavioral
changes
(e.g.,
aggression,
abnormal
vocalization,
agitation,
sedation,
somnolence,
convulsions,
tremors,
ataxia,
catatonia,
paralysis,
fasciculation,
prostration,
unusual
locomotion,
and
asphyxia) during the first 30 min and the first
hour, followed by hourly observations for 5
h,
and
then
periodically
up
to
48
h.
Daily
observations were conducted for 14 days to
monitor
general
behavior,
body
weight
changes, adverse symptoms, and mortality.
According
to
the
guideline,
the
LD
50
is
greater
than
5
g/kg
if
three
or
more
rats
survive.
At
the
end
of
the
experimental
period, all animals were weighed, sacrificed
by
cervical
dislocation,
and
subjected
to
necropsy for organ collection.

Hematological and biochemial analyzes.
At the
end
of
the
experimental
period,
blood
samples
were
collected
from
the
surviving
animals
via
the
abdominal
aorta
under
chloroform
anesthesia.
Hematology
samples
were
placed
into
EDTA-treated
tubes and analyzed using a CA-500 counter
(Drew
Scientific
Hemavet
950,
USA).
Parameters
measured
included
red
blood
cell count (RBC), hemoglobin concentration
(HGB), hematocrit (HCT), mean
corpuscular
volume
(MCV),
mean
corpuscular
hemoglobin
(MCH),
mean
corpuscular
hemoglobin
concentration
(MCHC),
platelet
count
(PLT),
and
white
blood
cell
count
(WBC). For clinical chemistry, blood samples
were collected into anticoagulant-free tubes,
allowed
to
clot
at
room
temperature,
and
centrifuged
at
3000
rpm
for
15
min
to
separate
the
serum.
Serum
biochemical
analyses
included
total
cholesterol
(T.Cho),
serum
glutamate
oxaloacetate
transaminase (SGOT), and serum glutamate
pyruvate transaminase (SGPT).

Macroscopic and Histological examination

Five
major
organs—kidneys,
spleen,
liver,
lungs,
and
heart—were
carefully
excised
using
sterile
surgical
instruments.
Each
organ
was
subjected
to
macroscopic
examination,
including
assessment
of
size,
color,
texture,
and
the
presence
of
visible
lesions
or
abnormalities.
Following
macroscopic
evaluation,
the
organs
were
placed into containers filled with 10% neutral

81
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

buffered
formalin
(NBF)
for
fixation.
Histological
preparation
and
microscopic
examination of the organs were conducted
at
the
Faculty
of
Pharmacy,
University
of
Jember.

Statistical analyses

All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n =
5). Statistical analyses were performed using
Jamovi
statistical
software
(version
2.3.28).
One-way
analysis
of
variance
(ANOVA)
was
applied, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for
multiple
comparisons.
A
value
of
p
<
0.05
was considered statistically significant[17].

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. LD
50
Value and Weight Change

The results of the sighting study showed that
Wistar rats administered crude XOS at doses
of
300
and
2000
mg/kg
body
weight
(BW)
exhibited
no
mortality
or
moribund
conditions;
however,
mild
toxic
signs
were
observed. Within the first 4 hours following
oral
administration
of
crude
XOS,
rats
in
both
dose
groups
displayed
signs
of
weakness and changes in stool consistency.
In
the
300
mg/kg
BW
group,
stool
consistency
returned
to
normal
within
24
hours. Based on the findings of the sighting
study, a dose of 2000 mg/kg BW was selected
for the main study. The results of the main
study
demonstrated
changes
in
stool
consistency in all rats within the first 4 hours
after administration, followed by recovery to
normal
conditions.
During
the
14-day
observation period, three Wistar rats in the
main
study
were
found
dead.
Accordingly,
the
oral
LD
₅₀
value
of
crude
XOS
was
estimated to be <2000 mg/kg BW. According
to Regulation No. 10 of 2022 issued by the
Badan
Pengawas
Obat
dan
Makanan
(BPOM),
substances
with
an
LD
₅₀
in
the
range of >300–2000 mg/kg BW are classified
as moderately toxic. It should be noted that
administration of XOS at an extremely high
dose may induce marked osmotic effects in
the gastrointestinal tract. As a non-digestible
oligosaccharide,
unabsorbed
XOS
can
substantially
increase
luminal
osmotic
pressure,
leading
to
excessive
water
retention, accelerated intestinal transit, and
severe osmotic diarrhea. At such high dose
levels,
these
effects
may
cause
significant
gastrointestinal imbalance and dehydration,
indicating
that
XOS
cannot
be
considered
safe when administered at excessively high
doses.
Rapid
fermentation
of
large
quantities
of
XOS
by
intestinal
microbiota
may further generate short-chain fatty acids
and
gases,
potentially
resulting
in
gastrointestinal
stress
and
systemic
physiological
burden.
This
result
contrasts
with the findings reported by Boonchuay et
al.,
(2021)
who
demonstrated
that
purified
corncob-derived XOS exhibited an LD
₅₀
value
greater
than
5,000
mg/kg
body
weight,
suggesting
a
practically
non-toxic
classification
[3]
.
The
primary
distinction
between the two studies lies in the degree of
product
refinement.
While
the
previous
study
evaluated
XOS
that
had
undergone
purification
processes
to
remove
residual
impurities, the present study utilized crude
XOS without purification.

Wistar rats that survived the main test after
14
days
showed
no
other
toxic
symptoms.
Changes in fecal consistency ceased on the
second day of observation. Body weight gain
occurred in line with the age increase of the
test animals. Data on changes in body weight
indicated that crude XOS at a dose of 2000
mg/kg BW had a considerable effect on the
growth
of
Wistar
rats.
The
graph
of
body
weight
changes
in
Wistar
rats
in
the
main
test can be seen in Figure 1.

82
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

Figure 1.
Body weight chart of male Wistar rats during the main test (administration of crude
XOS at a dose of 2000 mg/kg BW resulted in an increase in the body weight gain of test rats)

Clinical biochemistry tests

Clinical
biochemistry
tests
are
a
series
of
laboratory
tests
used
to
evaluate
the
chemical components in biological samples
such as blood, urine, or serum. These tests
provide
information
about
organ
function,
enzyme
levels,
nutrient
concentrations,
electrolyte
balance,
and
metabolic
conditions in the body [18]. Blood sampling
was
carried
out
on
the
last
day
of
the
observation period. Blood samples obtained
from the heart, or through cardiac puncture,
are
intended
to
collect
a
large
quantity
of
high-quality
blood
at
the
final
stage
of
the
study
[19]
.
Blood
serum
can
provide
information
regarding
organ
function.
The
Clinical
Biochemistry
examination
in
this
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
risk
of
cardiovascular disease in the liver using liver
enzyme tests such as SGOT and SGPT, as well
as
total
cholesterol
measurement.
The
results
of
the
clinical
biochemistry
examinations
of
Wistar
rats
administered
the crude XOS are presented in Table 1.

The biochemical analysis showed that total
cholesterol levels in both the control group
(26.07
mg/dL)
and
the
crude
XOS-treated
group (32.71 mg/dL) were below the normal
reference range (37.0–85.0 mg/dL). Although
a slight increase was observed in the treated
group
compared
to
the
control,
the
values
remained below physiological norms and did
not
indicate
treatment-related
lipid
disturbances.
Alterations
in
serum
lipid
parameters
are
commonly
used
to
assess
systemic metabolic effects in toxicity studies.
Serum
SGOT
levels
in
both
groups
were
within
the
normal
reference
range,
with
comparable
values
between
the
control
(137.29
U/L)
and
treated
animals
(138.79
U/L),
suggesting
no
evidence
of
hepatocellular
injury.
In
toxicological
evaluations, increases in SGOT and SGPT are
considered
sensitive
indicators
of
liver
cell
damage.
Although
SGPT
levels
in
both
groups were above the stated normal range,
the
treated
group
exhibited
lower
SGPT
levels
(67.43
U/L)
compared
to
the
control
group
(92.47
U/L).
Since
hepatotoxicity
is
typically
characterized
by
a
treatment-
related
elevation
in
transaminases
relative
to
controls,
the
findings
do
not
indicate
hepatic
injury
attributable
to
crude
XOS.
Overall, these biochemical findings suggest
that crude XOS administered at 2000 mg/kg
body
weight
did
not
produce
significant
alterations
in
liver
function
markers.

83
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

According to internationally accepted acute
toxicity
testing
guidelines,
biochemical
parameters
should
be
interpreted
in
conjunction with clinical signs and mortality
data to determine treatment-related effects
[20].

Table 1.
Clinical biochemistry results of male Wistar rats

Parameters

Control (n=5)

Crude XOS 2000
mg/kgBW (n=2*)

Normal Range

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

26.07 ± 0.05

32.71 ± 11.47

37.0 – 85.0

SGOT (U/L)

137.29 ± 0.21

138.79 ± 6.05

85.71 – 213.33

SGPT (U/L)

92.47 ± 0.33

67.43 ± 6.26

22.68 – 45.64

*
Values represent surviving animals in the 2000 mg/kg BW group

Hematological testing

Hematological
testing
in
toxicity
studies
is
crucial
because
it
provides
detailed
information
about
the
toxic
effects
of
a
substance
on
the
blood
system
and
body
metabolism.
Hematological
examination
involves
analyzing
leukocytes,
erythrocytes,
hemoglobin,
platelets,
and
hematocrit,
which
can
reveal
abnormalities
or
changes
that
occur
due
to
exposure
to
toxic
substances. The results of the hematological
analysis
are
presented
in
Table
2.
In
the
hematological parameters of male rats, the
leukocyte
and
MCV
values
in
test
rat
2
showed
a
slight
increase,
while
the
MCHC
value showed a slight decrease, all within the
BPOM reference range. Meanwhile, all other
hematological
parameters
showed
no
significant
differences
between
the
control
and
test
rats,
and
all
remained
within
the
BPOM reference range. The slight increases
and decreases in hematological parameters
of the male rats were still within the normal
range,
indicating
that
there
were
no
significant
disturbances
in
the
blood
cell
formation system [21].

Table 2.
Hematological parameters of male Wistar rats.

Parameters

Control (n=5)

Crude XOS 2000
mg/kgBW (n=2*)

Normal
Range

WBC (10
3
/mm
3
)

13.58 ± 0.39

13.46 ± 5.41

3.0 – 17.0

HGB (g/dL)

14.50 ± 0.10

13.90 ± 0.14

11.0 – 19.0

RBC (10
6
/mm
3
)

7.23 ± 0.16

7.30 ± 0.35

5.0 – 10

PLT (10
3
/mm
3
)

781 ± 0.50

929.5 ± 19.09

200 - 1500

HCT (%)

42.53 ± 0.35

42.20 ± 0.00

35.0 – 57.0

MCH (pg)

19.10 ± 0.05

19.00 ± 1.13

18.0 – 23.0

MCHC (g/dL)

32.53 ± 0.35

32.85 ± 0.21

31.0 – 40.0

MCV (fl)

57.9 ± 0.25

57.90 ± 2.82

46.0 – 65.0

Note: WBC, white blood cell; HGB, hemoglobin; RBC, red blood cell; PLT, platelet count; HCT, red blood cell specific
volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin;
MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean
corpuscular volume, *
Values represent surviving animals in the 2000 mg/kg BW group

84
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

Macropathological testing

Macropathological
observation
aims
to
identify physical and morphological changes
in
organs
due
to
exposure
to
the
test
compound.
This
observation
provides
an
initial overview of the toxic effects that may
occur
[22].
Macropathological
examination
of
the
organs
in
rats
was
conducted
by
performing
macroscopic
observations
and
calculating
the
relative
organ
weights.
The
organs observed included the liver, kidneys,
heart,
spleen,
and
lungs.
Relative
organ
weight is the ratio between the organ weight
and the total body weight of the test animal,
usually
expressed
as
a
percentage.
This
parameter is commonly used in toxicological
studies
to
assess
the
effects
of
the
test
substance on organ function and condition,
as well as physiological disorders induced by
exposure
to
chemicals
or
drugs
[23].
The
results of relative organ weight observations
in rats are presented in Table 3. The changes
in relative organ weight were not significant,
indicating
that
administration
of
the
crude
XOS at a dose of 2000 mg/kg did not cause
any
meaningful
changes
in
the
liver.
The
macroscopic observations of each organ in
the control group and test rat are shown in
Figure 2.

Table 3.
Relative organ weight of male Wistar rats.

Test Animals

Liver (%)

Kidney (%)

Heart (%)

Spleen (%)

Lung (%)

Control (n=5)

3.53 ± 0.81

0.53 ± 0.06

0.53 ± 0.06

0.53 ± 0.06

0.56 ± 0.10

Crude
XOS
2000
mg/kgBW (n=2*)

4.10 ± 0.14

0.57 ± 0.05

0.57 ± 0.05

0.57 ± 0.13

0.63 ± 0.04

*Values represent surviving animals in the 2000 mg/kg BW group

Assessment
of
relative
organ
weights
revealed
no
statistically
significant
differences
between
the
control
and crude
XOS-treated
groups
(2000
mg/kg
BW)
(p
>
0.05). The relative liver weight in the treated
group (4.10 ± 0.14%) was slightly higher than
that
of
the
control
group
(3.53
±
0.81%);
however, the difference was not statistically
significant.
Since
alterations
in
liver
weight
may
reflect
hepatocellular
hypertrophy,
congestion,
or
inflammatory
changes,
the
absence of significant variation suggests that
crude XOS did not induce hepatotoxic effects
at the tested dose
[24]
.

The
relative
kidney
weights
were
0.53
±
0.06% in the control group and 0.57 ± 0.05%
in
the
treated
group,
with
no
significant
difference
observed
(p
>
0.05).
Changes
in
kidney weight are commonly associated with
nephrotoxicity,
edema,
or
inflammatory
processes. The lack of significant alteration
indicates that crude XOS administration did
not
adversely
affect
renal
integrity
under
acute exposure conditions
[24]
.

Similarly,
the
relative
heart
weights
in
the
control
and
treated
groups
were
0.53
±
0.06%
and
0.57
±
0.05%,
respectively,
showing no statistically significant difference
(p > 0.05). Cardiac enlargement may indicate
hypertrophy
or
toxic
stress;
therefore,
the
absence of significant changes suggests that
crude
XOS
did
not
produce
cardiotoxic
effects
[25]
.

85
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

(n)

(o)

Figure 2.
Macroscopic examination of organs in control and test rats: (a) liver in control rat, (b)
liver in test rat 1, (c) liver in test rat 2, (d) kidney in control rat, (e) kidney in test rat 1, (f) kidney
in test rat 2, (g) heart in control rat, (h) heart in test rat 1, (i) heart in test rat 2, (j) spleen in control
rat, (k) spleen in test rat 1, (l) spleen in test rat 2, (m) lung in control rat, (n) lung in test rat 1, (o)
lung in test rat 2.

For the spleen and lungs, the relative organ
weights were 0.53 ± 0.06% and 0.56 ± 0.10%
in the control group, and 0.57 ± 0.13% and
0.63
±
0.04%
in
the
treated
group,
respectively.
Statistical
analysis
demonstrated
no
significant
differences
between
groups
(p
>
0.05),
indicating
that
crude XOS did not induce treatment-related

86
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

effects
on
immune
or
respiratory
organs.
Macroscopic
examination
corroborated
these
findings.
All
examined
organs
exhibited normal morphology, characterized
by smooth surfaces, normal coloration, and
absence
of
visible
lesions,
hemorrhage,
congestion, or enlargement. No macroscopic
damage was observed in the treated animals
compared with the control group
[26]
.

Histopathology

Histopathology
is
the
analysis
of
organ
or
tissue
conditions
through
microscopic
observation of morphological and structural
changes,
as
well
as
indications
of
damage,
infection,
or
other
mutagenic
processes
caused by disease or toxic agents [27]. Based
on
the
histopathological
evaluation
of
the
kidneys
(Figure
3),
differences
were
observed in test rat 1 (male) and test rat 2
(male) administered XOS at a dose of 2000
mg/kg BW compared with the control group.
The kidneys of test rat 1 (male) and test rat 2
(male) were structurally preserved; however,
mild abnormalities were observed in several
glomeruli,
characterized
by
glomerular
swelling
(black
arrows).
Normal
glomeruli
(green
arrows)
showed
uniform
size
and
a
clearly
defined
Bowman’s
space.
The
swelling
was
limited
to
a
small
number
of
glomeruli,
indicating
a
localized
alteration
that
is
unlikely
to
cause
significant
impairment of overall renal function.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3.
Histopathological observation of the kidney: (a) kidney in normal control;
(b)
kidney
in
test
rat
1;
(c)
kidney
in
test
rat
2.
(Green
arrows
indicate
normal
glomeruli, black arrows indicate swollen glomeruli).

87
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4.
Histopathological observation of the spleen: (a) spleen in normal control; (b) spleen
in test rat 1; (c) spleen in test rat 2. (Red circles indicate red pulp, black circles indicate white
pulp).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5.
Histopathological observation of the liver: (a) liver in normal control; (b) liver in test
rat 1; (c) liver in test rat 2. (Black circles indicate cytoplasmic condensation).

88
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 6.
Histopathological observation of the lungs: (a) lung in normal control; (b) lung in test
rat 1; (c) lung in test rat 2. (Green arrows indicate normal alveoli, black arrows indicate dilated
alveoli, black circles indicate hemorrhage).

Histopathological examination of the spleen
(Figure 4) revealed no significant differences
between
the
control
group
and
test
rats
1
(male) and test rat 2 (male), which received
XOS at a dose of 2000 mg/kg BW. The spleen
tissue
of
both
control
and
treated
rats
demonstrated
typical
architecture
composed of red pulp and white pulp. The
white pulp consisted of lymphocytes with a
purplish
hue,
indicated
by
black
circles,
whereas
the
red
pulp
was
composed
of
erythroblasts, indicated by red circles. In test
rat 1 (male), the lymphoid tissue
remained
well
preserved;
however,
some
sections
appeared
less
distinct
due
to
artifacts
caused
by
tissue
slicing.
Overall,
no
structural
damage
was
detected
in
the
spleens
of
treated
rats,
and
their
cellular
morphology was comparable to that of the
control group.

In contrast, histopathological examination of
the
liver
(Figure
5)
demonstrated
mild
alterations.
Control
rats
demonstrated
normal
hepatic
architecture.
In
contrast,
liver sections from test rat 1 (male) and test
rat 2 (male) revealed focal areas of increased
staining
intensity
(black
circles),
corresponding to cytoplasmic condensation
in
hepatocytes.
These
alterations
were
localized predominantly in zone 1 (periportal
region)
of
the
hepatic
lobule.
Cytoplasmic
condensation in the absence of necrosis or
extensive
cellular
damage
is
generally
considered
indicative
of
mild,
early-stage
hepatocellular
degeneration,
representing
the
earliest
detectable
pathological
change
in hepatocytes [28].

Histopathological
examination
of
the
lungs
(Figure 6) in test rat 1 (male) and test rat 2
(male) revealed focal inflammatory changes,

89
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

indicating
structural
alterations
in
the
pulmonary
tissue.
The
affected
sections
showed
distended
alveoli
with
widened
interalveolar spaces (black arrows), whereas
normal
alveoli
(green
arrows)
exhibited
uniform
architecture
without
apparent
enlargement.
The
widening
of
alveolar
spaces
was
associated
with
inflammatory
cell infiltration. In addition, hemorrhagic foci
(black circles) were observed, characterized
by
the
presence
of
erythrocytes
within
the
interalveolar spaces. The hemorrhage likely
resulted
from
vascular
dilation
and
increased
vascular
permeability,
allowing
blood
cells
to
extravasate
into
the
surrounding alveolar tissue [29].

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 7.
Histopathological observation of the heart: (a) heart in normal control; (b) heart in
test rat 1; (c) heart in test rat 2. (Green arrows indicate normal heart wall).

Considering that the route of administration
was
oral,
the
pulmonary
lesions
observed
are unlikely to be attributable to inhalation
of
XOS.
The
findings
may
instead
reflect
secondary
systemic
effects,
aspiration-
related
changes
during
oral
gavage,
or
nonspecific inflammatory responses.

Based
on
histopathological
observation
of
the
heart,
no
differences
were
observed
between the control rats and test rat 1 (male)
and test rat 2 (male) administered XOS at a
dose
of
2000
mg/kg
BW.
Histopathological
evaluation of the heart (Figure 7) in control
rats and test rats 1 and 2 (male) showed well-
preserved
heart
walls,
with
no
evidence
of
damage or abnormalities.

Conclusion

The acute oral toxicity study demonstrated
that
crude
XOS
administered
at
a
dose
of
2000
mg/kg
body
weight
resulted
in
mortality in 3 out of 5 rats during the 14-day
observation period. Based on these findings,
the oral LD
₅₀
of crude XOS was estimated to
be <2000 mg/kg body weight. According to
the
classification
criteria
of
the
United

90
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

Nations Globally Harmonized System (GHS),
the
substance
falls
under
Category
4
for
acute
oral
toxicity.
Biochemical
evaluation
revealed
no
marked
elevation
of
hepatic
transaminases (SGOT and SGPT) relative to
controls,
suggesting
the
absence
of
significant
hepatocellular
injury.
Histopathological examination showed mild
and
localized
degenerative
changes
in
the
liver,
focal
glomerular
swelling
in
the
kidneys, and inflammatory and hemorrhagic
foci
in
the
lungs,
without
evidence
of
extensive
necrosis
or
severe
structural
damage.
These
findings
suggest
that
although
mortality
occurred
at
the
tested
dose,
overt
target-organ
toxicity
was
not
strongly
demonstrated.
Given
that
the
test
material
was
crude
XOS,
the
observed
toxicity may be associated not only with the
oligosaccharides
themselves
but
also
with
residual
impurities,
by-products,
or
endotoxin
contamination
remaining
from
the
production
process.
Therefore,
further
purification
and
compositional
characterization
of
XOS
are
recommended
to
reduce
potential
impurities
and
better
evaluate its intrinsic safety profile. Additional
studies using purified XOS preparations are
necessary to clarify the relationship between
purity level and acute toxicity outcomes.

Acknowledgement

This
research
supported
by
Hibah
Inovasi
2024
Universitas
Jember
through
Anak
Agung Istri Ratnadewi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization,
AAI
Ratnadewi
and
Evi
Umayah; Methodology, AAI
Ratnadewi, Mei
Syafriadi;
Validation,
Cahya,
Reisma
and
Putra; Formal Analysis, Tri Agus Siswoyo and
Putra;
Investigation,
AAI
Ratnadewi;
Data
Curation, Cahya, Reisma and Putra; Writing –
Original
Draft
Preparation,
Cahya,
Reisma
and
AAI
Ratnadewi;
Writing
–
Review
&
Editing, Evi Umayah.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

[1]
Turck D, Bresson JL, Burlingame B, Dean T,
Fairweather-Tait
S,
Heinonen
M,
Hirsch-
Ernst KI, Mangelsdorf I, McArdle HJ, Naska A,
Neuhauser-Berthold M, Nowicka G, Pentieva
K, Sanz Y, Siani A, Sjodin A, Stern M, Tome D,
Vinceti M, Willatts P, Engel KH, Marchelli R,
Pöting A, Poulsen M, Schlatter JR, Turla E, and
van
Loveren
H.,
“Safety
of
xylo-
oligosaccharides
(XOS)
as
a
novel
food
pursuant
to
Regulation
(EU)
2015/2283,”
EFSA
Journal
,
vol.
16,
no.
7,
2018,
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5361

[2]
Arome D and Chinedu E. The importance of
toxicity testing.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and
BioScience
, 2014. 4(2013): 146-148.

[3]
Boonchuay P, Wongpoomchai R, Jaturasitha
S,
Mahatheeranont
S,
Watanabe
M,
and
Chaiyaso T. Prebiotic properties, antioxidant
activity,
and
acute
oral
toxicity
of
xylooligosaccharides
derived
enzymatically
from
corncob.
Food
Bioscience
,
2021.
40,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.100895

[4]
Ali
K,
Nadia
N.,
Muhammad
W.,
Waqas
A.,
Mudassar H, Muhammad UK, Assam BT, Ali
R,
and
Imran
MK.
Xylooligosaccharides:
A
comprehensive
review
of
production,
purification,
characterization,
and
quantification.
Food
Research
International.
2025.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024
.115631

[5]
Corim
Marim
AV,
and
Gabardo
S.
Xylooligosaccharides:
prebiotic
potential
from
agro-industrial
residue,
production
strategies
and
prospects.
Biocatalysis
and
Agricultural
Biotechnology
.
2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102190

[6]
Samanta
AK.
Jayapal
N,
Jayaram
C,
Roy
S,
Kolte
AP,
Senani
S,
and
Sridhar
M.
Xylooligosaccharides
as
prebiotics
from
agricultural
by-products:
Production
and
applications.
Bioactive
Carbohydrates
and

91
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

Dietary
Fibre
.
2015,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcdf.2014.12.003

[7]
Santibáñez L, Henríquez C, Corro-Tejeda R,
Bernal
S,
Armijo
B,
and
Salazar
O.
Xylooligosaccharides
from
lignocellulosic
biomass:
A
comprehensive
review,”
Carbohydrate
Polymers
.
2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.1171
18

[8]
Singh
RD,
Nadar
CG,
Muir
J,
and
Arora
A.
Green
and
clean
process
to
obtain
low
degree
of
polymerisation
xylooligosaccharides
from
almond
shell.
Journal
Cleaner
Production.
2019
.
241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11823
7

[9]
Ratnadewi
AAI, Suwardiyanto H, Masruroh,
and Santoso AB. Application of Coffee Peel
Waste
as
Raw
Material
for
Xylooligosaccharide
Production.
Coffee
Science
,
2019.
14:446–454.
https://doi.org/10.25186/cs.v14i4.1610

[10] Ratnadewi
AAI,
Santoso AB,
Sulistyaningsih
E, and Handayani W. Application of Cassava
Peel
and
Waste
as
Raw
Materials
for
Xylooligosaccharide
Production
Using
Endoxylanase
from
Bacillus
subtilis
of
Soil
Termite Abdomen.
Procedia Chemistry
. 2016.
18:31–38,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2016.01.00
7

[11] Ratnadewi
AAI.
Production
of
Xylooligosaccharide
from
Cassava
Pulp’s
Waste
by
Endo-β-1,4-D-Xylanase
and
Characterization
of
Its
Prebiotic
Effect
by
Fermentation
of
Lactobacillus
acidophilus.
Fermentation
.
2022.
8(10),
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation81004
88

[12] Ratnadewi AAI, Handayani W, Oktavianawati
I,
Santoso
AB,
and
Puspaningsih
NNT.
Isolation and Hydrolysis Xylan from Soybean
Waste with Endo-β-1,4-D-Xilanase of Bacillus
sp. From Soil Termite Abdomen.
Agriculture
and
Agricultural
Science
Procedia
,
2016.9:371–
377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.0
2.152

[13] Ali S, Hamayun M, Siraj M, Khan SA, Kim HY,
and
Lee
B.
Recent
advances
in
prebiotics:
Classification,
mechanisms,
and
health
applications.
Future
Foods
.
2025.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100680

[14] Gao Y, Zhang S, Li C, Xiao L, Shen J, and Yin J.
Acute
and
subchronic
toxicity
of
xylo-
oligosaccharide in mice and rats,”
Toxicology
Mechnisms
Methods
.
2012.
22(8):
605–610.
https://doi.org/10.3109/15376516.2012.706
837

[15] Jain
M,
Gote
M,
Dubey
A,
Narayanan
S,
Krishnappa H, Kumar D, Ravi G, Vijayasarathi
S,
and
Shankar
S.
Safety
evaluation
of
fructooligosaccharide
(FOSSENCE
TM):
Acute,
14-day,
and
subchronic
oral
toxicity
study in Wistar rats.
Toxicology Research and
Application
.
2018.
2,
https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847318787750

[16] Kpemissi
M,
Metowogo
K,
Melila
M,
Veerapur
V,
Negru
M,
Taulescu
M,
Potârniche
A,
Suhas
D,
Puneeth
T,
Vijayakumar S, Eklu-Gadegbeku K, Aklikokou
K.
Acute
and
subchronic
oral
toxicity
assessments
of
Combretum
micranthum
(Combretaceae)
in
Wistar
rats.
Toxicology
Reports
.
2020.
7:162–168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.00
7

[17] Connell
E.
Tietz
Textbook
of
Clinical
Chemistry
and
Molecular
Diagnostics
(5th
edn).
Annals
of
Clinical
Biochemistry:
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
,
2021.
49(6).
https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2012.201217

[18] Kumar
M,
Dandapat
S,
Prasad
Sinha
M,
Kumar
A,
and
Raipat
BS.
Different
blood
collection
methods
from
rats:
A
review,”
Balneo
Research
Journal
.
2017.
8
(2)
.
https://doi.org/10.12680/balneo.2017.141

[19]
Chitlange
(Kasat)
SN
,
Jungare
S
A
,
and
Ghangale
SG.
Six Sigma Metrics: Indicator of
Quality Assurance for Clinical Biochemistry.
International
Journal
Advanced
Research
(Indore).
2024.
12(01).
https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/18105

[20] de
Freitas
C,
Carmona
E,
and
Brienzo
M.
Xylooligosaccharides
production
process
from
lignocellulosic
biomass
and
bioactive
effects.
Bioactive
Carbohydrates
and
Dietary
Fibre.
2019.
18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcdf.2019.100184

[21] Widiadnyani NKE, and Sudimartini LM. The
Akut Toxicity Testing Lethal Dose Oral Green

92
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93

Meniran Leaf Extract by Using Mice.
Buletin
Veteriner
Udayana
.
2024,
https://doi.org/10.24843/bvu.v16i1.71

[22] Sabilla GA and Widiyanto S. Effect of SNEDDS
(self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system)
kawista
leaf
aqueous
extract
(
Limonia
acidissima
L.) on body and organ weight of
Rats.
Bioscience
.
2021.
5(2).
https://doi.org/10.24036/0202152113065-0-
00

[23] Wijayanti
HN,
Fadhilah
YN,
Yuniarti
WM,
Lukiswanto
BS,
Arimbi
A,
Suprihati
E,
Kurnijasanti
R.
Protective
effect
of
Moringa
oleifera
leaves
extract
against
gentamicin
induced hepatic and nephrotoxicity in rats.
Iraqi
Journal
of
Veterinary
Sciences
.
2023.
37(1).
https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2022.133
276.2197

[24] Noor
Z,
Kusindarta
DL,
Sadewa
AH,
Heriyanto
DS,
Hadiati
DR,
and
Mustofa.
Acute
toxicity
of
the
galactagogue
phytomedicine
containing
Sauropus
androgynous,
Trigonella
foenum-graecum,
and
Moringa
oleifera.
Pharmaceutical
Sciences
Asia.
2022.
49(4).
https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2022.04.21.21
7

[25] Marjawan
H,
Pratiwi
WR,
Nugrahaningsih
DAA,
Sholikhah
EN,
and
Satriyo
PB.
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
Test
of
Antihypertensive
Polyherbal
Preparations
Containing
Allium
sativum
Curcuma
aeruginosa
&
Amomi
fructus.
Majalah
Farmaseutik
.
2022.
18(4).
https://doi.org/10.22146/farmaseutik.v18i4.
79299

[26] Tandi
J,
Mariani
NMI,
and
Setiawati
NP.
Potensi
Ekstrak
Etanol
Daun
Afrika
(
Gymnanthemum
amygdalinum
(Delile)
Sch.
Bip,
Ex
walp)
Terhadap
Penurunan
Kadar
Glukosa Darah dan Histopatologi Pankreas
Tikus Putih Jantan (Rattus norvegicus) yang
Diinduksi
Streptocotocin
dan
Pakan
Tinggi
Lemak.
Majalah
Farmasetika.
2020.
4.
https://doi.org/10.24198/mfarmasetika.v4i0
.25861

[27] Himawan S.
Patologi
, 1st ed.
Jakarta:
Fakultas
Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia,
1994.

[28]
Oktora
MZ
,
Setiamurti
SM
, and
Khomeini
K.
Perubahan
Gambaran
Histologik
Paru
Mencit (
Mus musculus
) yang Terpapar Asap
Rokok
.
Health
and
Medical
Journal
.
2023.
5(2).
https://doi.org/10.33854/heme.v5i2.128
6

93
P Vergian et al.,
Chempublish Journal, 10(1) 2026, 78-93