PERAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN DAERAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK NOTARIS DI KOTA PEKANBARU

Authors

  • TIARA HASFAREVY UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v3i1.11270

Keywords:

Notaris, Kode Etik, Dewan Kehormatan

Abstract

Abstract

Violation of a notary code of ethics that occurs in Pekanbaru City, lack of understanding of the duties and functions of a notary public, violations committed by a notary are included in the code of ethics sanction in the form of suspension and dismissal of a notary public. Sanctions received by notaries who violate the code of ethics are not only suspension and dismissal sanctions, but also get criminal and civil sanctions. The issues raised in this study, namely 1) how the scope of violations of the notary code of ethics in the city of Pekanbaru, 2) how the role of the regional Honorary Council in resolving violations of the notary code of ethics in the city of Pekanbaru and 3) what are the obstacles to the regional Honorary Board in resolving the code violations ethical notary in the city of Pekanbaru.The scope of violation of the notary code of ethics in Pekanbaru City is in the supervision of the Regional Honorary Council in providing sanctions other than based on examination at the trial also looking at the good faith of the Notary who is aware of his mistakes and wants to make improvements to the deed he made. Some violations of the notary code of ethics in Pekanbaru City are notaries who spend more time doing activities outside the office, installing name signs not in accordance with standards, installing flower boards by writing PPAT and Notary Public. The role of the Pekanbaru City Honorary Board in solving violations of the Notary Ethics Code in the city of Pekanbaru has not been fully effective, because so far the Honorary Board has never sanctioned a notary who violated the nameplate installation. The Pekanbaru City Honorary Council has imposed sanctions only in the form of verbal reprimands to the notary who committed the violation, no written warning or dismissal had ever been held in the association of notary organizations that committed violations. The obstacle to the Regional Honorary Council in solving violations of Notary Ethics Code in Pekanbaru city is that the Rules for conducting oversight are incomplete, the Notary Honorary Board who has the authority to supervise the performance of Notaries is often very slow and walks in following up on any violations committed by Notaries. Furthermore, the object of supervision is the peer notary himself. Efforts must be made related to obstacles faced by the Pekanbaru City Honorary Council by conducting regular guidance and guidance in member meetings which are held once a month.

 

Keywords: Keywords: Notary, code of Ethics, Honorary Board.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, Habib. HukumNotaris Indonesia, Bandung :RefikaAditama, 2009.

Alief Latief, “ Main Bajak Karyawan Dan Kode Etik Notaris Dan/PPAT ,†Renvoi (Juli 2004)

Andasasmita,Komar.Notaris Dengan Sejarah, Peranan, Tugas Kewajiban, Rahasia Jabatannya, Bandung : Sumur, 1981.

Basu Swasta, Azaz-Azas Marketing Dalam Pengawasan, Yogyakarta : Liberty, 1996

Fajar, Mukti dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press, 2011.

H.R, Ridwan.Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers, 2011.

H.S, Salimdan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

Komaruddin Hidayat, Arti dan Istilah Pengawasan, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994.

Mertokusumo,Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Yogyakarta : Liberty, 1991.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir.HukumdanPenelitianHukum,Bandung : PT.CitraAdityaBakti, 2004.

Pandoman,Agus.Etika Profesi Hukum, Yogyakarta : Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Tanpa Tahun.

Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu. Sekarang dan Di Masa Datang, Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka, 2008.

Poerwadaminta,W.J.S. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta : Balai Pustaka, 1993

Pramudya, Kelik dan Ananto Widiatmoko.Pedoman Etika Profesi Aparat Hukum, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Yustisia, 2010.

Setiawan, Wawan. Notaris Profesional dan Ideal, Jakarta : Media Notariat, 2004.

Situmorang, Viktor M. dan Cormentyna Sitanggang, Hukum Administrasi Pemerintahan Di Daerah, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 1993

Soemitro,RonnyHanitijo.MetodologiPenelitianHukumDanJurimetri,Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia,1990.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : UI Press, 1996.

Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Bandung : Mandar Maju, 2011.

Suryabrata,Sumadi.Metode Penelitian, Jakarta : Rajawali, 1990.

Tedjosaputro,Liliana.Etika Profesi Notaris Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung : Bayu Grafika, 1995.

Widiyono.Wewenang Dan Tanggung Jawab, Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Widyadharma,Ignatius Ridwan.Etika Profesi Hukum, Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro, 1996.

Winata,Frans Hendra.Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Profesi Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Winardi. Pengawasan Dalam Organisasi Kepemimpinan, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta, 2000.

Zulham. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013.

N.G. Yudara, Notaris dan Permasalahannya (Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Di Seputar Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Notaris Serta Akta Notaris Menurut Sistem Hukum Indonesia), Makalah disampaikan dalam rangka Kongres INI di Jakarta : Majalah Renvoi Nomor 10.34. Edisi ke III, 2006, hlm. 72.

http://mknunsri.blogspot.co.id/2012/08/tinjauan-terhadap-kode-etik-notaris.html

Downloads

Published

2021-05-06

How to Cite

HASFAREVY, T. (2021). PERAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN DAERAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK NOTARIS DI KOTA PEKANBARU. Recital Review, 3(1), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v3i1.11270