Ethnoscience of Enau (arenga Pinnata): Exploring the Local Knowledge of Jambi Communities for Contextual Science Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/proca.v2i2.55516Keywords:
Arenga Pinnata, Contextual Learning, Ethnobotany, Ethnoscience, Local KnowledgeAbstract
Several traditional communities possess rich local knowledge and traditions related to the management of the sugar palm (enau, Arenga pinnata), encompassing ecological, economic, and cultural values. However, much of this knowledge remains undocumented and has not been optimally utilized in science education. This study aims to explore and document local community knowledge about the sugar palm and to examine the ethnoscientific values embedded within it for potential integration into contextual biology learning. The research was conducted in Jambi Tulo Village, Muaro Jambi Regency, using a descriptive qualitative approach. Informants were selected purposively and expanded using snowball sampling, involving sap tappers, palm sugar producers, customary leaders, and community members possessing traditional knowledge related to the sugar palm. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, visual documentation, and literature review, and analyzed using thematic and content analysis to identify relevant scientific concepts. The results indicate that the traditional management of the sugar palm reflects an integration between local knowledge and biological concepts such as plant structure and function, physiological processes (osmosis, root pressure), as well as ecological and conservation principles. Integrating these ethnoscientific values into biology learning can enrich learning contexts, strengthen students’ scientific understanding, and foster ecological awareness and appreciation of local wisdom.
References
1. Haryoso A, Amzu E, Hikmat A, Sunkar A, Darusman D. Ethnobotany of sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) in the sasak community, Kekait village, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 21(1). 2020.
2. Azhar I, Risnasari I, Srena MF. The utilization of sugar palm (arenga pinnata) by the people around Batang Gadis Nasional park area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;305(1):12016.
3. Gunawan R, Ramadhan UG, Iskandar J, Partasasmita R. Local knowledge of utilization and management of sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) among Cipanggulaan People of Karyamukti, Cianjur (West Java, Indonesia). Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. 2018;19(1):93–105.
4. Mogea J, Seibert B, Smits W. Multipurpose palms: the sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merr.). Agroforestry Systems. 1991;13:111–129.
5. Has DH, Marpaung SSM, Jati ED, Hartati BR, Fitrianto I, Yulianti I, Nugroho SPA, Rahmila YI, Rahmayanti FD, Fadilah R. Ethnobotany of Food Plants in The Penghulu Tribe Community in Sarolangun, Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2023;9(9):7705– 7712.
6. Santosa TA, Agustina N, Yulianti S. Jenis Tumbuhan Liar Dalam Upacara Adat Kenduri Seko Di Kerinci. Pendekar: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter. 2020;3(1):6–10.
7. Framita RM, Alamsyah Z. PENETAPAN HARGA DAN NILAI TAMBAH GULA AREN DI MUARA BULIAN KABUPATEN BATANGHARI. Journal of Agribusiness and Local Wisdom. 2021;4(1):26–36.
8. Marwoto M, Nurmansah R, Sitorus AS. Analisis Strategi Pemasaran Dalam Meningkatkan Penjualan Gula Aren di Desa Jambi Tulo Kecamatan Maro Sebo Provinsi Jambi. Jurnal MeA (Media Agribisnis). 2025;10(1):120–129.
9. Susilawati SHK. SEJARAH INDUSTRI GULA AREN DI DESA PULAU MENTARO KECAMATAN KUMPEH KABUPATEN MUARO JAMBI TAHUN 1980–2010. Istoria: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sejarah Universitas Batanghari. 2022;5(2):40–51.
10. Hutami R, Pribadi MFI, Nurcahali F, Septiani B, Andarwulan N, Sapanli K, Zuhud EAM, Al Manar P, Ichsan N, Wahyudi S. Proses produksi gula aren cetak (Arenga pinnata, Merr) di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pangan Halal. 2023;5(2):119–130.
11. Adom D. Inclusion of local people and their cultural practices in biodiversity conservation: lessons from successful nations. American Journal of Environmental Protection. 2016;4(3):67–78.
12. Merçon J, Vetter S, Tengö M, Cocks M, Balvanera P, Rosell JA, Ayala-Orozco B. From local landscapes to international policy: contributions of the biocultural paradigm to global sustainability. Global Sustainability. 2019;2:e7.
13. Mistry J, Berardi A. Bridging indigenous and scientific knowledge. Science. 2016;352(6291):1274–1275.
14. Pejchar L, Jeffrey J. Sap-feeding behavior and tree selection in the endangered Akiapolaau (Hemignathus munroi) in Hawaii. The Auk. 2004;121(2):548–556.
15. Sylvana S, Nurlaila A, Deni D. Analisis Potensi Dan Pemanfaatan Tanaman Aren (Arenga Pinnata Merr.) Oleh Masyarakat Di Desa Tundagan Kecamatan Hantara Kabupaten Kuningan. Journal of Forestry And Environment. 2022;5(2):66–75.
16. Lempang M. Pohon aren dan manfaat produksinya. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan. 2012;9(1):37–54.
17. Sibarani R. The local wisdom on Aren (Arenga pinnata) palm tree in Toba Batak tradition of North Sumatera at Lake Toba Area. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1116(5):52060.
18. Mansyur S, Ririmasse MNR, Handoko W, Fadillah MA, Djindar NI, Naping H, Hijjang P, Arifin A. Mappatettong Ale’, Manno Salo, and Mattu’bang Ale’: Agriculture, Rituals, and Ecological Symbols in Baringeng, Soppeng Regency, South Sulawesi Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2024;1430(1):12026.
19. Mazzocchi F. Western science and traditional knowledge: Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other. EMBO Reports. 2006;7(5):463–466.
20. Mandikonza C. Integrating indigenous knowledge practices as context and concepts for the learning of curriculum science: A methodological exploration. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 35. 2019.
21. Sotero MC, Alves, Â. G. C., Arandas JKG, Medeiros MFT. Local and scientific knowledge in the school context: characterization and content of published works. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2020;16:1–28.
22. Halim A. The Indonesian curriculum: Does it retain culturally responsive teaching? Journal of English Language and Culture, 11(1). 2022.
23. Sleeter CE. Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education. 2012;47(3):562–584.
24. El Yazidi R, Rijal K. Science learning in the context of’indigenous knowledge’for sustainable development. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education. 2024;1(1):28–41.
25. Rahmawati Y, Ridwan A, Cahyana U, Wuryaningsih T. The integration of ethnopedagogy in science learning to improve student engagement and cultural awareness. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2020;8(2):662–671.
26. Mulyono Y, Sapuadi S, Yuliarti Y, Sohnui S. A framework for building scientific literacy through an inquiry learning model using an ethnoscience approach. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 2024;11(8):158–168.
27. Sari SP, Mapuah S, Sunaryo I. Pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam berbasis etnosains untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. EduBase: Journal of Basic Education. 2021;2(1):9–18.
28. Sari FP, Maryati M, Wilujeng I. Ethnoscience studies analysis and their integration in science learning: literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2023;9(3):1135–1142.
29. United Nations. The 17s Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals. n.d.
30. Johnson AT, Mbah MF. (Un) subjugating indigenous knowledge for sustainable development: considerations for community-based research in African higher education. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education. 2021.
31. Sumida Huaman E, Valdiviezo LA. Indigenous knowledge and education from the Quechua community to school: beyond the formal/non-formal dichotomy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2014;27(1):65–87.
32. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. 2016.
33. Ahmad M, Wilkins S. Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 1–19. 2024.
34. Ting H, Memon MA, Thurasamy R, Cheah, J.-H. Snowball Sampling: A Review and Guidelines for Survey Research. Asian Journal of Business Research Volume, 15(1). 2025.
35. Roque A, Wutich A, Brewis A, Beresford M, Landes L, Morales-Pate O, Lucero R, Jepson W, Tsai Y, Hanemann M. Community-based participant-observation (CBPO): A participatory method for ethnographic research. Field Methods. 2024;36(1):80–90.
36. Ebidor, L.-L., Ikhide IG. Literature review in scientific research: an overview. East African Journal of Education Studies. 2024;7(2):211–218.
37. Reyes-García V, Huanca T, Vadez V, Leonard W, Wilkie D. Cultural, practical, and economic value of wild plants: a quantitative study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany. 2006;60(1):62–74.
38. Moriolkosu AD, Handayani SSD, Sunarso A. Ethnomathematics and ethnoscience analysis of Aru culture related to mathematics and science concepts at elementary school. Educational Management. 2020;9(2):163–171.
39. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
40. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. 2016.
41. Rahmawati Y, Taylor PC. “The fish becomes aware of the water in which it swims”: revealing the power of culture in shaping teaching identity. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2018;13:525–537.
42. Fitri G, Irwanto R, Akbarini D, Henri H. Etnobotani Tumbuhan Aren (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merr) pada Suku Melayu Bangka Desa Sungkap, Bangka Tengah. BIOMA: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya. 2025;7(1):25–38.
43. Raho B, Jebadu A, Juhani S. Kokor Gola Kolang: Pesan-Pesan Kearifan Tradisi Pante Pembuatan Gula Aren (1st ed.). Penerbit Ledalero. 2020.
44. Surya E, Ridhwan M, Armi A, Jailani J, Samsiar S. Konservasi Pohon Aren (Arenga Pinnata Merr) Dalam Pemanfaatan Nira Aren Terhadap Peningkatan Ekonomi Masyarakat Di Desa Padang Kecamatan Terangun Kabupaten Gayo Lues. Jurnal BIOnatural, 5(2). 2018.
45. Pieter J, Risamasu PVM, Gunada IW. Penerapan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Berbasis Etnosains Jayapura Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan. 2025;10(2):1640–1648.
46. Kurniasih W, Wulan AR, Nuraeni E. Profil awal kompetensi abad ke-21 peserta didik SMA dalam keterampilan mengevaluasi dan merancang penyelidikan ilmiah pada konten COVID- 19. Seminar Nasional Sains & Entrepreneurship, 1(1). 2021.
47. Nugraha D, Octavianah D. Diskursus literasi abad 21 di indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama. 2020;7(1):107–126.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bambang Hariyadi, Azizah Turrohmah, Winda D. Kartika, Cut Multahadah, Rahma Dani, Danial Mursyid, Fitri Astriawati, Ine Tentia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published with license by LPPM Universitas Jambi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0 International). This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.
