INTEGRATING PEER LEARNING AND INQUIRY CYCLE WITH PHET TO IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING OF DYNAMIC ELECTRICITY

Authors

  • Dede Solihat Institut Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Deni Darmawan Institut Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Khammataliev Dostnazar Omonovich Chirchik State Pedagogical University image/svg+xml
  • Usarov Jabbor Eshbekovich Chirchik State Pedagogical University image/svg+xml
  • Ergachev Rustam Rakhimovich Tashkent Institute of Irrigation Engineering and Agricultural Mechanization

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v10i2.46140

Keywords:

Peer lesson, PhET simulation, Conceptual understanding

Abstract

Most eighth-grade junior high school students often experience difficulties in understanding abstract and complex physics topics, such as dynamic electricity, which frequently leads to misconceptions and negatively impacts learning outcomes. To address this problem, researchers developed and tested an integrated learning strategy that combines peer teaching, the inquiry learning cycle model, and the use of PhET simulations, enabling students to conduct virtual experiments. This study used the ADDIE development model, which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research subjects consisted of 32 ninth-grade students of SMPN 1 Bayongbong, with a one-group pretest-posttest design to measure the learning impact. The validation of the learning tool was carried out by four experts, who obtained an average score of 0.89, indicating high theoretical feasibility. In terms of practicality, teachers gave an average rating of 91%, and students gave an average rating of 87%, both indicating a very good level of practicality. During four meetings, students took pretests and posttests, engaged in peer teaching activities, and learned concepts directly through PhET simulations. Concept understanding was measured through a structured test and then analyzed using the N-Gain method. In this study, the N-Gain score obtained was 0.57, indicating a moderate category. In addition to quantitative data, student observations and reflections showed positive impressions. These findings strengthen the evidence that this learning strategy can help students better understand the concept of dynamic electricity.

References

Al-Husaeni, D. F., Al-Husaeni, D. N., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Rokhman, M., Chalim, S., Chano, J., Al Obaidi, A. S. M., & Roestamy, M. (2024). How Technology Can Change Educational Research? Definition, Factors for Improving Quality of Education and Computational Bibliometric Analysis. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v4i2.62045

Alfira, A., Salmilah, S., & Suryani, L. (2024). Revolutionizing Learning. International Journal of Asian Education, 5(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v5i2.385

Amini, N. F., Roektiningroem, E., & Wilujeng, I. (2022). Development of Student Worksheet Based on Guided Inquiry Assisted by Phet Simulation to Improve Concept Comprehension. In JSER Journal of Science Education Research Journal, 6(1), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v6i1.48244

Anisa, V. M., & Astriani, D. (2022). Implementation of PhET simulation with discovery learning model to improve understanding of dynamic electricity concepts. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3438

Basuki. (2019). E-Book: Interactive Qualitative Data Analysis Between Miles-Huberman And Spradley in Basuki’s Dissertation. http://www.basukiasadi.com.

Bogador, C. J., Camarao, M. K. G., Matunding, C. G., & Sombria, K. J. F. (2024). Challenges and Benefits of Inquiry-Based Learning in Physics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(7), 2716–2732. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.07.26

Bouchée, T., de Putter-Smits, L., Thurlings, M., & Pepin, B. (2024). The Design and Construction Of A Phet-Based Inquiry Learning Worksheet to Develop Understanding of The Particle-In-A-Box Model. Physics Education, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad11f8

Bozzi, M., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Zani, M. (2021). Peer Learning as a Key Component of an Integrated Teaching Method: Overcoming the Complexities of Physics Teaching in Large Size Classes. 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci

Brundage, M. J., Malespina, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Peer Interaction Facilitates Co-Construction of Knowledge in Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020133

Cahaya, N., Fauziah, N., Ferazona, S., Hidayati, N., & Artikel Abstrak, I. (2024). Lembar Praktikalitas: Instrumen yang Digunakan untuk Menilai Produk yang Dikembangkan pada Penelitian Pengembangan Bidang Pendidikan. In Biology and Education Journal, 4(1).

Cynthia, C., Arafah, K., & Palloan, P. (2023). Development of Interactive Physics E-Module to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3943–3952. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2302

Dantic, M. J. P., & Fluraon, A. (2022). PhET Interactive Simulation Approach in Teaching Electricity and Magnetism Among Science Teacher Education Students. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 2(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v2i2.101

Darmawan, E., Trienita, G., & Hartati, T. A. W. (2023). Enhance Student Ict Literacy and Conceptual Understanding Using Selm (Simas Eric Learning Model). Biosfer, 16(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.32682

Dy, A. U., Lagura, J. C., & Baluyos, G. R. (2024). Using PhET Interactive Simulations to Improve the Learners’ Performance in Science. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(4), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2981

Fajarwati, A. A., Nugraheni, P., & Purwaningsih, W. I. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Kontekstual Menggunakan Articulate Storyline 3 Pada Materi Pola Bilangan Untuk Membantu Pemahaman Konsep, 4(2).

Firdaus, A. R., Samsudin, A., & Widodo, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of The Connect, Investigation, Analysis and Conclusion (CIAC) Learning Model in Promoting Students’ Understanding on The Roles of Empirical Evidence in Science. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v10i2.54333

Hartati, T. A. W., Lestari, P. B., Istiawan, N., & Darmawan, E. (2024). Digital Literacy Level Of Prospective Teacher Students In The 4.0 Industrial Revolution Era. Journal of Research in Instructional, 4(2), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i2.485

Hidayat, T., Darmawan, D., & Setiawati, L. (2019). Pengembangan Media “Sempoa Digital Berbasis M-Learning” pada Pelajaran Matematika dalam Pokok Bahasan Aritmatika (Studi Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Metode Design and Development). EDUTCEHNOLOGIA, 3(1).

Isbah, H., & Adi, B. S. (2024). The Influence of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Model Assisted by Phet Simulation Media to Increase HOTS of Class 6 Elementary School Students in Electrical Circuits. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 1847–1854. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.6225

Islanda, E., & Darmawan, D. (2023). Pengembangan Google Sites Sebagai Media Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Teknodik, 27(1), 51–62.

Nesi, Y. M. D., Kusairi, S., & Nafisah, A. W. L. (2022). Analysis of student perceptions of problem-solving learning and peer assessment. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 6(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6005

Nurjanah, S., & Widihastuti, W. (2023). The application of Aiken’s V method for evaluating the content validity of instruments that measure the implementation of formative assessments. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation. 12(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v12i2.76451

Pranata, O. D. (2024). Physics Education Technology (Phet) As A Game-Based Learning Tool: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Pedagogical Research, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15154

Pratiwi, H. Y., Hudha, M. N., Asri, M., & Ahmad, N. J. (2019). The Impact Of Guided Inquiry Model Integrated with Peer Instruction Towards Science Process Skill And Physics Learning Achievement. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v3i2.2768

Rahmasari, B. S., Munir, A., & Nugroho, H. A. (2025). Fostering Learner Autonomy in EFL Reading: A Study of Strategy-Based Instruction at Two Indonesian Universities. Cogent Education, 12(1). 2477367. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2477367

Rosen, D., & Kelly, A. M. (2023). Mixed Methods Study Of Student Participation And Self-Efficacy In Remote Asynchronous Undergraduate Physics Laboratories: Contributors, Lurkers, And Outsiders. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00428-5

Samsudin, A., Azura, Kaniawati, I., Suhandi, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Supriyatman, Wibowo, F. C., Malik, A., & Costu, B. (2019). Unveiling Students’ Misconceptions Through Computer Simulation-Based PDEODE Learning Strategy On Dynamic Electricity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052050

Santoso, P. H., Istiyono, E., & Haryanto. (2022). Physics Teachers’ Perceptions about Their Judgments within Differentiated Learning Environments: A Case for the Implementation of Technology. Education Sciences, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090582

Sari, M. M. P., Indrawati, I., & Budiarso, A. S. (2021). Pengaruh Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis PhET Terhadap Motivasi dan HOTS Siswa SMP. Edufisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v6i2.12546

Schell, J. A., & Butler, A. C. (2018). Insights From the Science of Learning Can Inform Evidence-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction. In Frontiers in Education. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00033

Singh, C. (2016). Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance. American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 446–451. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1858450

Sudirman, S., & Qaddafi, M. (2023). The Application of Student Worksheets Based on PhET Simulation to Increase the Concept Understanding in Hooke’s Law. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9505

Susilawati, A., Yusrizal, Y., Halim, A., Syukri, M., Khaldun, I., & Susanna, S. (2022). Effect of Using Physics Education Technology (PhET) Simulation Media to Enhance Students’ Motivation and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1571

Umiliya, U., Azizahwati, , & Mahadi, I. (2023). The effectiveness of the application of PhET with inquiry learning model to improve understanding of the concept. Journal of Science Education Research, 7(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v7i2.59148

Usman, M., Suyanta, Pujianto, & Huda, K. (2021). Energy Literacy of Junior High School Students in Indonesia: A Preliminary Study. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education, 541. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.088

Uwambajimana, S., Minani, E., Mollel, A. D., & Nyirahabimana, P. (2023). The impact of using PhET simulation on conceptual understanding of electrostatics within selected secondary schools of Muhanga District, Rwanda. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13595

Wulandari, M., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Analisis Penggunaan E-Modul Untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Pembelajaran Fisika Siswa Di Sma: Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematik. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.23317

Yuliati, L., Riantoni, C. & Mufti, N. (2018). Problem Solving Skills on Direct Current Electricity through Inquiry-Based Learning with PhET Simulations. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1149a

Yunzal, A. N., & Casinillo, L. F. (2020). Effect of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Simulations: Evidence from STEM Students’ Performance. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 221–226. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE

Zamnah, L. N., & Ruswana, A. M. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis dan Self-Confidence Melalui Pembelajaran Peer Instruction with Structured Inquiry (PISI). JPPM: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1), 49-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v11i1.2984

Zhang, Z. (2022). Diagnostically Cognitive Assessment of Complex Semantic Explanations and Learning: A Bayesian Network Approach. Journal of Education and Development, 6(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v6i4.1255

Zulkarnain, M. Z., Suyana, I., & Chandra, A. F. (2022). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Practices Of Scientific Investigation Peserta Didik : Analisis Menggunakan Pendekatan Instruksional Implisit Dan Eksplisit. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 7(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v7i2.48006

Downloads

Published

2025-08-27

How to Cite

INTEGRATING PEER LEARNING AND INQUIRY CYCLE WITH PHET TO IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING OF DYNAMIC ELECTRICITY. (2025). EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v10i2.46140