THE CONVERGENCE OF ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY AND STEM/STEAM: PATTERNS, TRENDS, AND RESEARCH GAPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v10i2.44675Keywords:
Argument-Driven Inquiry,Abstract
The integration of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) with STEM and STEAM approaches has gained attention in recent years due to their shared emphasis on inquiry, collaboration, and real-world problem solving. However, a comprehensive synthesis of how this integration has been researched is still lacking. This scoping review aims to map the trends, patterns, and gaps in studies focusing on ADI-STEM/STEAM integration in secondary science education. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for scoping reviews, literature was collected from Scopus and Google Scholar using a range of relevant keywords. Thirteen eligible articles published up to April 2025 were analyzed based on publication type, country, research method, subject, and focus. Findings show that research on ADI-STEM/STEAM integration began in 2020 and is primarily concentrated in Indonesia. Most studies used mixed methods and focused on physics education, with key variables including conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. However, creative thinking, reflective thinking, scientific literacy, and self-efficacy remain underexplored—particularly within the ADI–STEAM context. Only one study was categorized as a development study, indicating opportunities for designing specialized instructional tools or media to support integration. This study is the first to systematically map ADI-STEM/STEAM research trends using a scoping review approach. Its novelty lies in providing a structured and visualized synthesis of an emerging field. The results offer important insights for educators and researchers seeking to expand innovative, interdisciplinary, and inquiry-based practices in science education.References
Admoko, S., Hariyono, E., Madlazim, & Dwikoranto. (2025). Trens of Science Education Research on Argumentation Skills and the Contribution of Indonesia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(2), e02311. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe02311
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Stem vs. Steam education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
Ardwiyanti, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2021). STEM research trends in indonesia: A systematic literature review. In Journal of Science Education Research Journal (Vol. 2021, Issue 1).
Atqiya, N., Yuliati, L., & Diantoro, M. (2021). Argument-driven inquiry for STEM education in physics: Changes in students’ scientific reasoning patterns. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043636
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
BAYDAŞ, Ö., YEŞİLDAĞ-HASANÇEBİ, F., & KİLİS, S. (2018). Argümantasyon Tabanlı Bilim Öğrenme Yaklaşımında Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Tartışma Süreçlerinin İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.341522
Bukifan, D., & Yuliati, L. (2021). Conceptual understanding of physics within argument-driven inquiry learning for STEM education: Case study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043638
Bukifan, D., Yuliati, L., & Koes Handayanto, S. (2020). Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Termodinamika Dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry for STEM Education. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for Education: STEM Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA (National Science Teachers Assocation).
Campbell, F., Tricco, A. C., Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Saran, A., Sutton, A., White, H., & Khalil, H. (2023). Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family. Systematic Reviews, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5
Cavagnetto, A. R., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2010). Negotiating the Inquiry Question: A Comparison of Whole Class and Small Group Strategies in Grade Five Science Classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9152-y
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.
Day, R. a, & Gastel, B. (2006). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. In Medical Physics (Vol. 7, Issue 5).
Dewi Arofah Mochsif, N., Parno, & Yuliati, L. (2021). Pengaruh Model Argument-Driven Inquiry-STEM-EFA terhadap Peningkatan Scientific Reasoning Skills Siswa. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Epriliyani, E. W., & Deta, U. A. (2025). The Influence of the Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning Model in Physics Learning with the STEAM Approach on the Scientific Argumentation Ability. 14(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v14n1.p6-10
Eymur, G. (2018). Developing High School Students’ Self-Efficacy and Perceptions about Inquiry and Laboratory Skills through Argument-Driven Inquiry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00934
Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM Education Implementation in Indonesia: A Scoping Review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2
HASANÇEBİ, F., GÜNER, Ö., KUTRU, C., & HASANÇEBİ, M. (2021). Impact of Stem Integrated Argumentation-Based Inquiry Applications on Students ’ Academic Success, Reflective Thinking and Creative Thinking Skills. Participatory Educational Research, 8(4), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.90.8.4
Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The Effects of Integrated STEM Education Practices on Problem Solving Skills, Scientific Creativity, and Critical Thinking Dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6
Insanul Hikmah, S., Tukiran, T., & Nasrudin, H. (2023). Validity of Student Worksheets Based on Model Argument Driven Inquiry Integrated by STEM to Train Students’ Argumentation Ability and Self-Efficacy in Chemical Equilibrium Material. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.300
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2025). Naskah Akademik Pembelajaran Mendalam Menuju Pendidikan Bermutu Untuk Semua.
Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B. M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
Langoday, Y. R., Nurrahma, N., & Rijal, S. (2024). Policy Reflection: Kurikulum Merdeka as Educational Innovation in the Era of Society 5.0. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(2), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.915
Maulidiyah, E. C., Setyowati, S., Reza, M., & Komalasari, D. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of STEAM in Early Childhood Education in Indonesia (2018-2022): Innovation of Learning for Children. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_187
Mochsif, N. D. A., Parno, P., & Yuliati, L. (2024). The effect of the ADI model with STEM approach and formative assessment (ADI-STEM-FA) for increasing students’ concept acquisition on heat material. THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICoMSE) 2022: Educational Diversity and the Future of Mathematics and Science Education Research, 060008. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0214805
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. In Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9596
Nurhidayati, E., Masykuri, M., Isma, D., & Fakhrudin, A. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Dengan Pendekatan STEM Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Pada Materi Cahaya dan Alat Optik. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961.inkuiri.v12i3.79317
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ (Vol. 372). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Papadopoulou, E. A. (2024). Advancements in STEAM Education for 21st Century Learners. International Journal of Education, 16(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v16i4.22270
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Arts , . Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1300970
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Purnomo, S., Rahayu, Y. S., & Agustini, R. (2023). Effectiveness of ADI-STEM to Improve Student’s Science Literacy Skill. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.382
Razi, A., & Zhou, G. (2022). STEM, iSTEM, and STEAM: What is next? International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.119
Sampson, V., & Schleigh, S. (2012). Scientific Argumentation in Biology: 30 Classroom Activities. In Scientific Argumentation in Biology: 30 Classroom Activities. NSTA Press. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781936137275
Setiawan, B., & Suwandi, E. (2022). The Development of Indonesia National Curriculum and Its Changes: The Integrated Science Curriculum Development in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.211
Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, N., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0137-0
Suganda, T., Parno, P., Sunaryono, S., Latifah, E., & Yuliati, L. (2023). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Ability Through Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Integrated STEM. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112514
Suganda, T., Parno, & Sunaryono. (2023). Building Critical Thinking Skills Through the ADI Model with STEM and Formative Assessment. 726–742. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-060-2_66
Suganda, T., Parno, Sunaryono, Yuliati, L., & Latifah, E. (2023). Building students’ scientific argumentation skills through the model ADI integrated STEM approach and formative assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2614. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125798
Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science and Education, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. In Annals of Internal Medicine (Vol. 169, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Utami, L., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., & Arsih, F. (2024). Argument Driven Inquiry in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review.
Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012044
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zaima Nabila Roshifa, Parno Parno, Nuril Munfaridah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![](<a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2477-7935" target="_blank" style="display: block; width: 150px; height: auto;"><img src="https://doaj.org/static/doaj/images/logo/seal.png"/></a>){kind=logo}
