This is an outdated version published on 2018-12-15. Read the most recent version.

PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI ELASTISITAS

Keywords:

jigsaw, two stay two stray, hasil belajar

Abstract

This study was aimed (1) is there any significant to improve students’ learning outcomes using cooperative model jigsaw and two stay two stray types, (2) is there any significant difference students’ learning outcomes using cooperative model jigsaw and two stay two stray types, (3) student and teacher activities using cooperative model jigsaw and two stay two stray types. This study was used quantitative approach which apllies comparative and descriptive research. The static group pretest-posttest design was used in this research. The sample was taken using judgment sampling, 5 of XI-IA and 6 of XI-IA students were used as sample. This study was conducted at MAN of Palangka Raya on September to October 2017. The student’s cognitive learning outcomes, afektif and psychomotoric observation students’ learning outcomes, and students and teacher activities were used as instruments. The result of this study obtained by (1) there is any a significance to improve students’ learning outcomes using cooperative model jigsaw and two stay two stray types, (2) there is nothing a significant difference students’ learning outcomes using cooperative model jigsaw and two stay two stray types, (3) the teacher activities using cooperative model using jigsaw type with a mean 82,89 high category  and cooperative model using two stay two stray type with a mean 84, 20 high category, the students activities using cooperative model using jigsaw type with a mean 79,85 high category and cooperative model using two stay two stray type with mean 83,58 high category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aksan, Hernawan. 2014. Seri Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.
A.M, Sardiman. 2011. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Arends, R.I. 2001. Exploring Teaching: An Introduction to Education. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
Astuti, Sri. 2015. Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri Jayaloka tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. STKIP-PGRI Lubuk Linggau.
Dewi, Resita Pristiana. 2013. Pengaruh Keakuratan, Tepat Waktu, Keandalan Dan Relevansi Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Pada PT Garam (PERSERO) Surabaya.Skripsi.STIESIA Surabaya.
Hanafiah, dkk. 2009. Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Aditama.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ibahim, dkk. 2000. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Jakarta: UNESA-University Press.
Jati, Niko Kumala. 2016. Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw II Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas IV SDN Sapen Manis Renggo Klaten Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016.Skripsi.Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Purwaningsih, Ariyati & Panjaitan. 2014. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Di Kelas X MAN 1 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA.Pontianak : FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura.
Raras, Aristin, dkk. Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Yang Menggunakan model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Dengan Discovery-Inquiry Di SMA.Seminar nasional Fisika Volume IV.
Rusman.2008. Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw.http://style-lecture.blogspot.com/2012/09/pembelajaran-kooperatif-model-jigsaw.html.
Sanjaya, Wina. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Soleha, lutfi Awaliyah. 2015. Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Antara Siswa Yang Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Dan Jigsaw Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan. Skripsi.UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Solihatin & Raharjo. 2007. Cooperative Learning (Analisis Pembelajaran IPS). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyanto. 2010. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
Suhadi.2010. Karakteristik Dan Tujuan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Ebook: Alifa Alternative Media. Diunduh dari http://suhadinet.wordpress.com.pada tanggal 20 Oktober 2017.
Sukmadinata, Nana syaodih. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suprijono, Agus. 2009. Cooperative Learning (Teori Dan Aplikasi Paikem). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wahyuni & Munthe. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika : FMIPA Unimed.
Warnita, I Dewa Made. 2015. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI IPA 4 SMA Negeri 1 Selemedag Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015.JPTK.UNDIKSHA.
Yuhendrawati. 2012. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas IV.A Sekolah Dasar Negeri 164 Pekanbaru..Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Jurusan Ilmu Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Riau.

Published

2018-12-15

Versions

How to Cite

PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI ELASTISITAS. (2018). EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(02), 13-21. Retrieved from https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/EDP/article/view/5334