GENDER DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION OF PHYSICS ONLINE LEARNING

Authors

  • Ahmad Syarkowi Universitas Bengkulu
  • Dedi Hamdani Universitas Bengkulu
  • Aprina Defianti Universitas Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24718

Keywords:

Gender, Learning Physics, Satisfaction Index

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to see the level of student satisfaction in carrying out online learning by comparing the perspectives of male and female students. This study used a cross sectional survey research method to 329 students in Bengkulu province consisting of 130 male students and 199 female students. Sampling for this study used a random system. The results showed that the highest satisfaction index for female students was the score they got during their activities with an average score of 4.10, on the contrary, they had the lowest score on the belief that they could study independently without face-to-face, which was the lowest point with a score of 3.07. From the male perspective, they were satisfied with the way to connect the previous learning by the teacher with an average score of 3.94 but the same as female students, most male students were also not sure that they would be able to study online.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agarwal, S., & Prasad, R. (2013). Effect of stabilizer on sensory characteristics and microbial analysis of low fat frozen yoghurt incorporated with carrot pulp. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology, 4(8), 797–806.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

Basri, M., Husain, B., & Modayama, W. (2021). University students’ perceptions in implementing asynchronous learning during Covid-19 era. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 4(3), 263–276.

Chang, C.-S., Liu, E. Z.-F., Sung, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Chen, N.-S., & Cheng, S.-S. (2014). Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 366–377.

Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research.

Fernando, F., Zarkasih, Z., & Ilhami, A. (n.d.). Studi Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Gender. Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender, 19(2), 148–159.

Garland, D., & Martin, B. N. (2005). Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 67–81.

Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different: Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 14–30.

Jaya, I. (2019). Penerapan Statistik untuk penelitian pendidikan. Prenada Media.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396.

Lowes, S., Lin, P., & Kinghorn, B. R. C. (2016). Gender differences in online high school courses. Online Learning, 20(4), 100–117.

Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and selfâ€efficacy: A multiâ€year, multiâ€institution study of women engineering student selfâ€efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 27–38.

Morante, A., Djenidi, V., Clark, H., & West, S. (2017). Gender differences in online participation: Examining a history and a mathematics open foundation online course. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 57(2), 266–293.

Nuyami, N. I. M. S. R. I., Suastra, I. W., & Sadia, I. W. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Pair-Share Terhadap Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP Ditinjau Berdasarkan Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 4(1).

Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00294.x

Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 349–359.

Putra, N., & Syarkowi, A. (2021). Perbandingan Kepuasan Siswa terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika Sistem Online dengan Menggunakan Smartphone dan Laptop. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3), 487–498.

Rachmah, D. N., & Rahmiyati, R. (2022). Kejenuhan, Mengasihi Diri, Dan Gender Dapatkah Mempengaruhi Belajar Mandiri Siswa Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19? Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(2), 118–125.

Ramadhani, R., & Siregar, R. F. (2021). Analisis self efficacy matematika siswa terhadap pembelajaran daring pada masa pandemi Covid-19. MAJU: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2).

Rat Dwiyana Putra, I. D. G. (2019). Peran Kepuasan Belajar Dalam Mengukur Mutu Pembelajaran Dan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v5i1.756

Sembiring, I., & Wardani, H. (2021). Analisis Kemandirian Belajar dan Kecemasan Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gender Sisiwa. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara, 4(2), 13–23.

Septiani, D. R., & Purwanto, S. E. (2020). Hubungan Antara Kepercayaan Diri dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika Berdasarkan Gender. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 141–148.

Sugihartono, D., Harahap, F., Setiawati, F. A., & Nurhayati, S. R. (2007). Psikologi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY press.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumar, W. W. T. (2015). Implementasi kesetaraan gender dalam bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Musawa IAIN Palu, 7(1), 158–182.

Sumargo, B. (2020). Teknik sampling. Unj press.

Syahputra, E. (2013). Peningkatan kemampuan spasial siswa melalui penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3).

Weiss, R. P. (2001). Gender-biased learning. Training & Development, 55(1), 42.

Yulia, I. B., & Putra, A. (2020). Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Secara Daring. Refleksi Pembelajaran Inovatif, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2020, 2(2), 327–335.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-25

How to Cite

Syarkowi, A., Hamdani, D., & Defianti, A. (2023). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION OF PHYSICS ONLINE LEARNING. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 01-05. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24718