INOVASI PEMBELAJARAN (TEACHING GRANT) TERINTEGRASI APLIKASI ADOBE FLASH C.S.6 UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS

Nova Susanti; Rahma Dani

doi:10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.23614

Authors

Nova Susanti Universitas Jambi
Rahma Dani UNIVERSITAS JAMBI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.23614

Keywords:

Adobe Flash C.S.6, Critical Thinking Skills, Learning Innovation

Abstract

The activity of students when attending Astronomy and Geophysics Lectures in the physics education study program so far is still lacking. This is because the lecture tools are inadequate, students only listen to explanations from lecturers, and learning through the Zoom application is not very effective for students. To overcome this problem, it is necessary efforts are made to design Learning Designs that are good and adequate so that lectures can improve critical thinking skills. This study aimed to design a Learning Design with Adobe Flash C.S.6 Applications. The developer method of this research is 4-D (Four-D mode). The product development stage in this model is the definition stage, the design stage, the development stage, and the dissemination. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the learning device is feasible to use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajredini, F., Izairi, N., & Zajkov, O. (2013). Real Experiments versus Phet Simulations for Better High-School Students Understanding of Electrostatic Charging. European Journal of Physics Education, 5(1), 59-70.

August, S. E., Neyer, A., Murphy, D. B., Themes, R. Q., Hammer, M., Shoktgozar, D., & Vales, J. (2011). Engaging Student in STEM Education through a Virtual Learning Lab. Conference American Society Engineering Education (ASEE).

Baser, M. & Durmus, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of Computer Supported Versus Real Laboratory Inquiry Learning Environments on The Understanding of Direct Current elecriticty Among Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6 (1), 47-61

Ceberio, M., AlmudÃ, J. M., & Franco, Ã. (2016). Design and application of interactive simulations in problem-solving in university-level physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590-609.

J.C.DomÃnguez, R.Miranda, E.J. GonzÃ¡lez, M.Oliet, M.V. Alonso (2018). A Adobe Flash C.S.6 as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Education for Chemical Engineers, 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002

Jialing Wu (2018). A Space Design Teaching Model Using Virtual Simulation Technology. iJET 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8585

Karagoz, O., & Ozdener, N. (2010). Evaluation Of The Usability Different Adobe Flash C.S.6 Software Used In Physics Course. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 4(2), 216-235.

Keller, H.E & Keller, B. E. (2005). Making Real Adobe Flash C.S.6. The Science Education Review. 4(1), 2-11.

Martinez, G., Naranjo, F. L., Perez, A. L., & Suero, M. I. (2011). Comparative Study Of The Effectiveness Of Three Learning Environments: Hyper-Realistic Virtual Simulations, Traditional Schematic Simulations And Traditional Laboratory. Physics Review Special Topics- Physics Education Research, 7, 020111.

S. M. Baladoh, A. F. Elgamal, and H. A. Abas (2016). Adobe Flash C.S.6 to develop achievement in electronic circuits for hearing-impaired students. Educ. Inf. Technol, 1â€“15.

T. Lynch and I. Ghergulescu, (2017). Review of Adobe Flash C.S.6s As The Emerging Technologies For Teaching STEM Subjects. INTED2017 Proceedings, 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Spain, 6082â€“6091.

Wieman, C.E., Adam, W. K., Loeblin, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations. The Physics Teacher, 8, 225-227.

Zacharia, C.Z., & Jong, D.T. (2014). One Specific Advantage For Adobe Flash C.S.6oratories That May Support The Acquisition Of Conceptual Knowledge Is That Reality Can Be Adapted To Serve The Learning Process Reality Can Be Simplified By Taking Out Details. Cognition and Instruction, 32(2), 101-158.